Skip to main content
Relationships

How to Escape a Manipulative Partner

Manipulation comes under the microscope in new relationship research.

Key points

  • The contributors to manipulativeness in a relationship range from psychopathy to emotional dominance.
  • A new study teases apart the contributions of manipulativeness and other factors to relationship quality.
  • The results show any type of relationship can be marred by manipulativeness but there are ways to escape.

Being in the grips of a manipulative partner can make you feel not only suffocated but powerless. Meg is constantly doing things for her partner that he could easily do himself. Not only does she do the majority of household chores, but he somehow manages to make her feel that if she doesn’t run his errands, it proves he doesn’t love her. Meg is a kind person and she often does favors for her friends, but her partner’s constant demands are starting to get to her. Is there a way she can maintain their relationship as well as her autonomy?

The Personality Traits That Underlie Manipulativeness

According to University of Connecticut’s Meredith Turner (2026), “Manipulativeness is a common, yet complex, feature of interpersonal relationships,” associated with the personality trait of psychopathy along with the tendency to lie and emotionally abuse others. As bad as all of this sounds, there is a surprising lack of research on how these qualities affect how relationships characterized by a manipulative partner manage to survive (or not). The purpose of her research was to examine this research systematically to get some answers.

Turner notes that part of this gap in the literature comes from the “litany of different scales” that assess the quality of a relationship. There are also distinctions that need to be made between the personality traits themselves that contribute to manipulativeness vs. the behaviors that represent such factors as power differentials and the needs of the individual partners.

Meg’s problem seems to lie in the fear that her partner will abandon her if she doesn’t comply with his wishes. Not only does she feel dependent on him (perhaps reflecting her own needs), but he seems to hold some type of power over her that prevents her from standing up for herself. Whatever is causing this, she’s starting to feel that if things don’t change, she’ll need to get out somehow.

Measuring the Relational Costs of Manipulativeness

Beginning with a set of nearly 6,500 journal articles, Turner eventually narrowed the appropriate ones down to 16 after all the inclusion criteria were taken into account. Though small in number, these studies reflected 53 statistical effect estimators and nearly 11,000 participants.

The findings support the author’s initial suspicion that relationships suffer when there is a manipulative partner involved. The key personality trait of Machiavellianism indeed emerged as a significant predictor of poor relationship quality, as did emotional manipulation (e.g., “How often have you tried to make another person feel uneasy?”). There were no effects in the prediction equation of age, gender composition, and type of relationship, suggesting that Machiavellianism's “relational costs are consistent.”

Putting these findings into a larger theoretical context, the UConn psychologist cites “relational maintenance theory,” which contrasts the loving and caring behaviors that keep relationships healthy from the “antisocial behaviors” that tend to erode it. In the short term, manipulative partners do get their way, but over time, their efforts to elicit compliance will be outweighed by detracting from the partner’s feelings of trust and intimacy.

The issue for Meg therefore becomes one of asking whether her increasing discomfort with her partner is due to a general tendency he has to control others or whether it’s something specific to their relationship itself. Turner’s research suggests that it doesn’t really matter what’s causing the partner’s constant efforts to keep Meg in line, just the fact that it happens.

There’s an even larger perspective into which these findings can be placed, furthermore. According to “equity theory,” people will want to leave a relationship in which they feel they’re putting in more than their partner. A manipulative partner leaves the other one “underbenefited.”

How to Get Out of a Manipulative Relationship

In time, all relationships marked by manipulativeness are doomed to fail. The issue is how to minimize the damage when you’re at the receiving end of a manipulative partner. One of the surprising findings of the Turner study was the lack of impact of age, gender, or even closeness of relationship. You can get locked into one of these poisonous relationships with almost anyone. It could be a friend, a neighbor, or even a hairstylist. Knowing you can get out can get you to step one of actually getting out.

It won’t take a complete personality inventory to get you to the next step. How often do you notice your partner playing the shame game with you? Equity theory can help you with this part of the process. Meg’s partner makes her feel that if she doesn’t do all these things for him, it means she’s selfish. Yet, if she’s honest with herself, she knows that she is giving more than she is getting. You don’t have to keep a complete tally of who’s doing what for whom, but overall you should be able to have some ballpark percentage estimate.

Moving on from here, the next step is to analyze the costs of leaving this manipulative partner. How hard will it be to extricate yourself from this destructive relationship? If it’s simply impossible (e.g. due to practical constraints or the joint responsibility of children), then it’s time to have a direct conversation about the inequities in your relationship.

A big question in this last step of the process is whether you still hold feelings for this person. If the erosion has gotten too extreme, you probably don’t. But if there are still emotional connections, be sure to emphasize these while also trying to assert your independence.

To sum up, a manipulative person in a relationship can create strain that can eventually lead to its ending. Knowing when and how to assert your own needs can help that relationship go from inequitable to fulfilling.

Facebook image: Pheelings media/Shutterstock

References

Turner, M. M. (2026). Manipulation in close relationships: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 248, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113485

advertisement
More from Susan Krauss Whitbourne PhD, ABPP
More from Psychology Today