Skip to main content

Verified by Psychology Today


The Evidence on Alcoholics Anonymous

New research demonstrates AA works for many.

fizkes/Adobe Stock
Source: fizkes/Adobe Stock

More than 15 million Americans have an alcohol-use disorder, and overuse of alcohol leads to nearly 90,000 deaths each year in the United States, according to data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control.

A new systematic review by the Cochrane Collaboration takes a careful look at a decades-old treatment for alcohol abuse: Alcoholics Anonymous. The review includes 27 studies with nearly 11,000 participants in total. The studies looked at whether the traditional format of Alcoholics Anonymous led to longer periods of abstinence from alcohol use; some compared Alcoholics Anonymous to other types of therapy or group meetings.

Alcoholics Anonymous, or AA, was founded in 1935 on the idea that alcoholics could come together to support each other’s sobriety. Today, there are more than 2 million AA members across the globe. The program is based on 12 steps that include admitting that alcohol is a problem in your life, apologizing for your wrongs, and striving to do better. One of the fundamental tenets of the program is that members continue attending meetings long after they have completed the 12 steps and that they mentor newer members.

On the whole, the new review found that the 12-step AA intervention led to higher rates of abstinence from alcohol over the long term compared to other treatments for alcoholism. One of the main reasons, according to the data, is that people continue to participate in AA for years after they have completed the 12-step program. (The review did not look at whether 12-step programs were effective for treating abuse of other drugs.)

The review also found that AA performed as well as other treatments for reducing the intensity of drinking alcohol and reducing alcohol-related consequences.

This new review offers an updated perspective. A 2006 Cochrane review did not find solid evidence that AA was more effective than any other type of alcohol treatment program.

The authors did note that AA does not work for everyone who tries it. In the discussion section of the paper, they note that a major strength of the program is its expansive range. With meetings offered in nearly every U.S. town and city and 180 countries, the organization provides a new social context for people who want to restructure their lives around avoiding alcohol.

The take home-message: Alcohols Anonymous is an effective treatment for alcohol addiction, in large part due to its broad reach and large membership.

Visit Cornell University’s Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research’s website for more information on our work solving human problems.