"Recent books have identified one reason for these problems..."
Really?! This is what passes for proof of somebody's theory these days?
Psychology is a disaster.
So you're not a "10" in every which way. But you're probably pretty spectacular in some way, and definitely good enough in most areas of life. If ever there were a time to stop beating yourself up for being human, it is now.
Verified by Psychology Today
The college years have traditionally been a time for young people to be challenged by new ideas, learn to think critically, and assume greater responsibility for their lives, as they assume their roles as adult citizens. Unfortunately, the past few years have witnessed high levels of emotional dependency, anxiety, and depression among American college students (American College Health Association, 2008; Michael et al, 2006; Twenge,2000; Twenge, Zhang, & Im, 2004).
Recent books have identified one reason for these problems: psychological damage caused by overcontrolling parents. Middle-school teacher Jessica Lahey and Julie Lythcott-Haims, former dean of undergraduate advising at Stanford, describe the adverse effects of controlling parents. Psychology Today editor-at-large Hara Estroff Marano has written that such parenting “is likely the single largest factor contributing to the sharp rise in mental health problems among the young and the propensity of today’s kids to stay stuck in endless adolescence” (2008, p. 3).
Overcontrolling parents love their children and want to protect them from what they see as an increasingly dangerous world. So they frantically package them for success, protecting their children from failure while pressuring them to excel, doing their homework, making their decisions, and micromanaging their lives. Yet these parents may be depriving their children of essential brain development, sabotaging their ability to think for themselves and develop the very cognitive skills they need to succeed in life.
The college years coincide with a sensitive period of brain development (Casey, Jones, & Hare, 2008). From the late teens to the early twenties, our brains develop their adult connections. Active neural pathways are strengthened while those unused are pruned away. A high degree of personal control activates the prefrontal cortex, (Shapiro et al, 1995), while low personal control activates the subcortical limbic areas, leading to heightened anxiety and increases in cortisol levels (Mineka, Gunnar, & Champoux, 1986; Sapolsky, 1989). High cortisol levels impair the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, compromising neuronal networks essential for motivation, focused attention, working memory, response regulation, behavioral flexibility, and goal-directed learning (Arnsten, 2009; Cerqueira et al., 2007; Numan, 1978).
Students raised by overcontrolling parents have difficulty dealing with the challenges of college life because they’ve been denied the opportunity to develop age-appropriate cognitive function. Insecure, confused, and emotionally fragile, they experience high anxiety and chronic stress, which further weakens their cognitive ability. As research in my lab has shown, they are deficient in optimism and hope—the ability to set goals, make plans, and follow through (Dreher, Feldman, & Numan, 2014). They experience greater distress and adjustment difficulties, putting overwhelming demands on college counseling centers. And their emotional immaturity is a major cause for concern--not only for their future health and well-being but for the future of this country.
How can we reverse this unhealthy trend? By allowing our children to learn, supporting their brain development with age-appropriate agency and autonomy. Marano (2008) offers strategic advice in her book, including:
References
American College Health Association. (2008). American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment Spring 2007 reference group data report (abridged). (ACHA-NCHA). Journal of American College Health, 56, 469-480.
Arnsten, A. F. T. (2009). Stress signaling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 410-422.
Casey, B. J., Jones, R.M. & Hare, T. A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 111-126.
Cerqueira, J. J., Mailliet, F., Almeida, O. F. X., Jay, T. M., & Sousa, N. (2007). The prefrontal cortex as a key target of the maladaptive response to stress. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 2781-2787.
Dreher, D.E., Feldman, D. B., & Numan, R. (2014). Controlling parents survey: Measuring the influence of parental control on personal development in college students. College Student Affairs Journal, 32, 97-111.
Lahey, J. (2015). The gift of failure: How the best parents learn to let go so their children can succeed. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Lythcott-Haims, J. (2015). How to raise an adult: Break free of the overparenting trap and prepare your kid for success. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Company.
Numan, R. (1978). Cortical-limbic mechanisms and response control: A theoretical review. Physiological Psychology, 6, 445-470.
Marano, H. E. (2008). A nation of wimps. New York, NY: Broadway Books.
Michael, K. D., Huelsman, T. J., Gerard, C., Gilligan, T. M, & Gustafson, M. R. (2006). Depression among college students: Trends in prevalence and treatment seeking. Counseling and Clinical Psychology Journal, 3, 60-70.
Mineka, S., Gunnar, M., & Champoux, M. (1986). Control and early socioemotional development: Infant rhesus monkeys reared in controllable versus uncontrollable environments. Child Development, 57, 1241-1256.
Sapolsky, R. M. (1989). Hypercortisolism among socially subordinate wild baboons originates at the CNS level. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 1047-1051.
Shapiro, D. H., Wu, J., Buchsbaum, M., Hong, C., Elderkin-Thompson, V., & Hillard, D. (1995). Exploring the relationship between having control and losing control to functional neuroanatomy within the sleeping state. Psychologia, 38, 133-145.
Twenge, J. M. (2000). The age of anxiety? Birth cohort change in anxiety and neuroticism, 1952-1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1007-1021.
Twenge, J. M., Zhang, L., & Im, C. (2004). It’s beyond my control: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of increasing externality in locus of control, 1960-2002. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 308-319.
***********************************
Diane Dreher is a best-selling author, positive psychology coach, and professor at Santa Clara University. Her latest book is Your Personal Renaissance: 12 Steps to Finding Your Life’s True Calling.
Visit her web site at www.dianedreher.com
"Recent books have identified one reason for these problems..."
Really?! This is what passes for proof of somebody's theory these days?
Psychology is a disaster.
I agree! Such scholarly sources...
I work at a university and haven't noticed that our students seem particularly fragile.
When I read generalizations about college students today, I can't help remembering what the "experts" were saying about students during my undergraduate days, alleging that we were spoiled, promiscuous, drug-addled, unpatriotic, dirty. One writer recently claimed that we lived in "filth and squalor," while a contemporary, in the Oakland Tribune, referred to students as "hairy barbarians." (I had friends and classmates who were stopped by the police for "driving while young"--some more than once.) Yes, if a reporter or researcher looked hard enough, he or she could find examples of those characteristics. But, while allowing for some male classmates who could have used a bit of a makeover, I would say that I never met anyone who fit those descriptions. Growing up in the San Francisco area during the 60s and 70s, I never met an honest-to-goodness hippie. And yet the news media and the bookstores were full of hand-wringing over the "mess" that we were in, and incompetent, vicious hack politicians used these lies as a excuse to attack public education. Such attitudes are still common. So I am very skeptical about statements concerning the fragility or narcissism of today's students, especially when they're being used to sell books or magazines.
Petra, that was a thorough paragraph. You failed to add today's collegiate hook-up culture where coeds are enmeshed in one long sexcapade from the moment they entered college to the minute they leave, having random sexual flings with anyone they pass in the dorm hallway.
Nothing sells a title faster than using the words, "college", "female" and "hook-up" in the title.
To that, I refer you to this, suggesting that hookup culture is more of a myth:
http://www.upworthy.com/is-dating-officially-dead-for-millennials-lets-take-a-look-at-the-numbers
Because they are overloaded with home assignments. They must use http://examples.yourdictionary.com/essay-examples.html
Watch out if you ARE having a crisis adjusting to far from home college life! They might pump you with psycho poison and make you a mental patient for a couple of decades.
Because they are overloaded with home assignments. visit my website http://obatpengencerdarahkental.com/
Thank you for writing such a thoughtful piece on this topic.
As a military veteran studying at Yale, I have written a piece on my own observations on college moral tribes here:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/after-service/201607/student-veteran-s-guide-college-moral-tribes
Sapolsky, R. M. (1989). Hypercortisolism among socially subordinate wild baboons originates at the CNS level. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 1047-1051.
you are emotionally fragile... go and see a vet about it!
My brain might be overstimulated by cortisol levels.
I might be emotionally fragile, as this article suggests.
But that does not mean that my brain does not work well when I have the opportunity to relax and think clearly.
Guess what happens when I have the opportunity to think clearly...
I can see other brains that cannot function properly because they have been corrupt by indoctrination and abuse of power.
1) Why did human being develop this "lovely" "scientific" field
of psychology? My answer is - because their brains were not able to cope with the abuse of power (abuse of power can be intentional/unintentional and it can be vary in terms of its intensity).
1) If we assume that there is an epidemics of emotionally-fragile college students (as this article assumes) - I would like to suggest a completely different reason behind it: it is not about the parents - it is about the amount of the abuse of power the minds of the young people have been allowed/forced to witness. They know this, there is no advice available to cope with it, they might suppress this knowledge to the subconscious level, but it is still there to bother them.
My opinion is this: psychology exists only thanks to the existence of the abuse of power.
Abuse of power is here and it has always been here, so any change/improvement regarding this issue is not likely to happen.
But - psychology is here thanks to the existence of the abuse of power - so any psychological intervention/opinion/movement/trend that ignores this fact and does not address it as the core problem of all "mental disorders" should be evaluated from this point of view.
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.