Skip to main content
Boundaries

The Psychology Behind Repeating Relationship Patterns

Personal Perspective: How we violate boundaries in our relationships.

Key points

  • Relationship patterns repeat until unresolved boundaries are addressed.
  • Boundaries are defined by actions, not just words.
  • Avoidance and silence can normalize subtle boundary violations.
  • Early family dynamics shape how we tolerate discomfort in relationships.
stairs
stairs
Source: Pixabay/Birke Wache

Why does going back to your ex feel so natural, even when you know nothing will change?

Have you noticed that in your relationships, you keep meeting different people who somehow feel familiar? They may have different personalities, yet something core is always the same. One might be controlling, another emotionally immature. And every time you enter a new relationship, it feels better, but not entirely different.

Have you noticed that?

Life does not move in a circle; it moves in a spiral, meaning experiences and challenges repeat, but never in the exact same way (Hesse, 1997).

Relationships work the same way. If ten years ago you were with someone emotionally or physically abusive, the next partner may appear better on the surface, not abusive but more supportive. The same core issue might show up in a different form. Not necessarily because something is wrong with them, but because the unresolved issue has shifted inward, into what you accept and normalize.

It is important to note, that this does not mean we “attract the same people.”
It means unresolved patterns repeat until something in us responds differently.

At some point, blaming the other person stops being helpful.

People can act however they want until someone makes it clear where their line is. And if that line is crossed and nothing changes, then it is time to respond differently.

What are boundaries?

Are boundaries something you tell someone else to do?

Boundaries are internal decisions about (1) what behavior you stay emotionally present for; (2) what you step away from; (3) and what you do when something does not change.

In simple words, a boundary is not what you say, it is what you do next.

Anne Katherine (1993) writes: “We learn about boundaries by the way we are treated as children. Then we teach others where our boundaries are by the way we let them treat us.”

So, boundaries are not formed once. They are learned and repeated over time.

In my relationship with my mom, I felt the same dynamic.

Boundaries were crossed in subtle but consistent ways. After big fights, where someone was clearly hurt and an apology was needed, there was never repair.

Instead, we would stop talking for a while. Then my mom would say something like, “Come eat, I made lunch for you.”Slowly, the tension would dissolve. One day passes. Two days pass. I still feel angry, but by the end of the week, it is as if nothing happened.

There were no conversations about the words that hurt me. We’ve never returned to the fight. And what hurt the most was the lack of willingness to understand why I felt the way I did or why I reacted the way I did. We simply moved on, as if this was normal.

And we did this our entire life. Even now.

It is sad to realize that this is how boundary violations became normalized in my life, through a pitiful avoidance.

In our family, vulnerable and sensitive topics were skipped because they were heavy and emotionally risky. No raw feelings, but just surface-level peace. We preferred things to stay as they were, even if something important was left unresolved.

And that became my comfort, my homy feeling. Strange, isn’t it?

Psychologically, this is how the nervous system learns what “connection” costs.

When closeness returns only after discomfort is ignored, the body learns that connection is preserved by silence. If expressing hurt risks disconnection, the system learns to suppress it (Bowlby,1969).

So instead of going back to the conflict, I learned to accept things as they were. I learned to close my eyes to unresolved pain and continue the relationship because I did not believe anything would come from addressing my pain.

This, too, is a boundary violation.

Because again, I kept offering emotional closeness without emotional repair.

I distanced myself at times, but distancing is not the same as a boundary. A boundary would have required naming what was not working, identifying limits, and responding differently if nothing changed.

And I was not trying to change them. I still do not believe in changing people. Everyone lives their own life. Everyone makes their own choices. I just let them be.

How do early boundaries experiences affect our relationship patterns later?

In adult relationships, boundary violations do not always look dramatic. Control is not always about aggressive behavior. Sometimes it looks like emotional unavailability. Silence. Avoidance. Acting as if nothing is wrong when something clearly is.

Imagine this: a couple looks stable, even happy, on the surface. But underneath, there are unresolved issues that never get addressed. One partner expresses emotional needs, asking for openness, for conversation, for connection. The other avoids those conversations, minimizes the issue, or simply moves on.

She might say she feels lonely, unseen, disconnected.
He responds by acting as if everything is fine.

The next day, he calls to say good morning. They talk about their day. They make plans. On the surface, everything looks normal again.

This is the moment where a boundary could form, but it does not.

So what does her nervous system do?

It recognizes something familiar.

It remembers the childhood pattern: after the fight, we eat, we talk, we move on.

He says, come on, it is Friday. It was a long week. Let’s relax. Let’s not make things harder than they already are.

And slowly, without realizing it, she allows the same thing to happen again. The issue is never addressed. Her feelings are never fully acknowledged. The relationship continues, but something inside her starts to shut down.

Over time, she feels less important because of many tiny (unnoticeable for him) moments ones that were never resolved.

This happens when emotional discomfort is recognized but not acted on. You feel anxious, and unseen, but instead of that feeling leading to a clear limit, it gets explained away minimized, and normalized (Bowlby, 1969). And slowly, your inner world starts adjusting itself around someone else’s limits instead of your own.

This is where emotional boundaries are crossed.

Another example of boundary violation would be a breakup.

One partner clearly explains what is not working and initiates distance. The other comes back, with fake promises. Behavior briefly changes. And within months, the same emotional unavailability resurfaces.

And this cycle continues because it is allowed to.

Who do we blame here? No one.

Yes, it is easy to blame the person who keeps returning. But the core issue lies with the one who keeps reopening the door without new conditions.

Every time a boundary is crossed without consequence, it gradually teaches the relationship what is acceptable. Over time, both partners begin to experience this unstable, on-and-off dynamic as normal, even though it slowly erodes emotional safety and self-trust.

So, the lesson here is not about choosing better people.

It is about choosing different behavior when discomfort appears.

Ending the cycle means recognizing subtle violations early and responding differently. It means understanding that clarity without action changes nothing. And it means accepting that some relationships cannot evolve because they are built on patterns that were never interrupted.

This has been a deadly torturous realization for me, but also a quite powerful one. It feels as if I have lost a part of myself, not voluntarily, but as though my flesh has been torn away.

The good news is that, once boundaries are internalized fully, the spiral breaks. You become free.
Just be brave enough to break that pattern.

References

Katherine, A. (1993). Boundaries. Simon and Schuster.

Hesse, H. (1997). Siddhartha. https://hesse.projects.gss.ucsb.edu/works/locked/sidd-encr.PDF, pp. 1–67. New York: New Directions Publishing Corporation: Hilda Rosner. Retrieved from https://hesse.projects.gss.ucsb.edu/works/locked/sidd-encr.PDF

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. Attachment and Loss. New York: Basic Books.

advertisement
More from Aigerim Alpysbekova MPH
More from Psychology Today