Skip to main content
Dopamine

The Forecast in Your Mind: How Expectations Shape Experience

The neuroscience behind anticipation, disappointment, and letting go.

Key points

  • Dopamine rises in anticipation, not just reward—and the brain rebalances after a spike.
  • Prediction error is central to how we feel satisfaction, surprise, or disappointment.
  • Letting go of rigid expectations allows for presence, curiosity, and emotional resilience.
Cristina Conti/Shutterstock
Source: Cristina Conti/Shutterstock

A couple of years ago, I took a city break in England with my partner. It was one of those magical weekends—everything clicked. “This place is amazing,” we said. “We have to come back.” So we did. A year later, I rebooked and tried to recreate the experience. But something was off. It wasn’t the same. The spark had faded, and I couldn’t figure out why.

Have you ever returned to a place you loved, only to find it no longer holds the same magic? Or watched a movie you were excited about, only to be left disappointed? Chances are, the difference wasn’t in the place or the film—it was in your expectations.

At first glance, it seems like the world around us determines how we feel. But the truth is more surprising: our expectations don’t just colour experience—they shape it from the inside out.

Let’s begin with something simple.

The Movie That Let You Down

You’ve looked forward to a film for weeks. The critics love it, your friends are raving about it, and the trailer looked gripping. But halfway through, you're restless. You leave thinking, "That was it? I don't feel what everyone else seems to feel about it."

What’s going on here? A big part of the story is dopamine—the brain’s chemical messenger for motivation and reward—and it’s not working alone. The brain’s prefrontal cortex shapes anticipation and expectations, the amygdala is primed for emotional salience, and the hippocampus references memory. Your brain starts gearing up before the experience even begins, creating a kind of neural promise.

If reality doesn’t meet that promise—not just in terms of plot, acting, or pacing, but in how it lands emotionally relative to your internal narrative—dopamine levels fall. You’re left feeling flat or even disappointed. This is known as prediction error: the gap between what your brain expected and what happened.

But there’s more. As psychiatrist and researcher Anna Lembke explains, the brain regulates pleasure and pain like a seesaw. When dopamine levels spike too high, the brain will attempt to restore balance by tipping the seesaw in the opposite direction. The higher the initial rise in anticipation, the steeper the comedown. So it’s not just that the film didn’t deliver—it’s that your brain is recalibrating.

The Movie That Surprises You

Now, imagine the opposite. You go to the cinema with low expectations. Maybe you were dragged along. And yet—you laugh, you tear up, you’re left feeling uplifted.

Because your brain wasn’t primed to expect much, what follows exceeds the prediction. That positive surprise causes a dopaminergic lift—but again, it's supported by the brain’s broader reward and learning networks. These regions light up in response to novelty and positive emotional contrast, enhancing your emotional response and encoding the experience more vividly.

It’s not just the film that made it great—it’s the fact that it outperformed your forecast. Your brain didn't have to recover from a dopamine spike; instead, it was rewarded for curiosity and openness.

The Return That Fell Flat

The same is true when we try to recreate any experience by referencing the original.

The first time, your brain was open. No scripts, no predictions, just curiosity. You're present in the moment, wide-eyed and open. Novelty triggered rich sensory data and rewarded you with dopamine-fueled engagement. But the second time, you’re not just experiencing the place—you’re measuring it against your memory. And expectation narrows perception.

Your brain is constantly looking for what it already knows, filtering out what doesn’t match the previous narrative. This is why that first-time spark is so hard to replicate.

The Brain as a Prediction Machine

This dynamic is at the heart of what neuroscientist Karl Friston calls the free energy principle. The brain is constantly working to minimise the gap between what it expects and what it experiences. That gap—what neuroscientists call prediction error—is what determines how intensely we feel surprised, satisfied, or disappointed.

So, how you feel in a moment isn’t just about what happens. It’s about what you thought would happen—and how tightly you held onto that expectation.

Canvas Alchemy / Adobe Stock
Source: Canvas Alchemy / Adobe Stock

Placebo and the Power of Expectation

Few phenomena capture this better than the placebo effect. When someone takes a sugar pill believing it will relieve pain, their brain and body respond as if the treatment is real.

We now know that expectation alone can trigger the release of endogenous opioids and boost dopamine in reward pathways.

In a striking study, Parkinson's patients who believed they were getting dopamine treatment showed increased dopamine release, despite receiving a placebo (de la Fuente-Fernández et al., 2001).

The mind didn’t just influence the body. It rewrote the chemistry of experience.

Relationships, Work, and Emotional Loops

This doesn’t stop at pills or popcorn. In relationships, expectations shape how we interpret others. If you expect to be let down, your brain becomes hyper-attuned to signs of disappointment, filtering out nuance. Psychologists call this confirmation bias.

At work, we see something similar. The Pygmalion effect describes how higher expectations from teachers or leaders can boost someone’s performance. Expect the best, and the brain rises to meet the prediction.

In contrast, low expectations can quietly undermine confidence, fueling a self-fulfilling spiral of doubt.

Expectation and Mental Health

In depression and anxiety, this system can turn inward. The brain starts to expect failure, disconnection, or pain—even in neutral situations. This is known as negative expectancy bias.

Over time, the brain's default mode network becomes overactive, looping through past regrets and predicting more of the same. The nervous system prepares for pain in advance, reinforcing the very state it’s trying to avoid.

Think of it like this: Your nervous system becomes less like a weather station and more like a broken barometer—forecasting storms that never quite arrive, but shaping your inner world as if they already had.

So What Can We Do?

  1. Notice your forecasts. Pause before a conversation, an event, or a task. Ask: What am I expecting right now? This gentle awareness disrupts unconscious prediction.
  2. Meet the moment with curiosity. Curiosity is a powerful antidote to rigid forecasting. This is what Zen calls the "beginner's mind." It reactivates the brain’s novelty networks and invites you into presence. Even small shifts—noticing the colour of the sky, the feel of your breath—can break habitual patterns.
  3. Use expectation with intention. Expectations aren’t bad. But they become limiting when they’re rigid or unconscious. Try shifting from I need this to go well to I’m open to learning something here. This primes your system for engagement without the crash of disappointment.

What you experience isn’t just about what happens. It’s about the lens you bring.

Letting go of rigid expectations doesn’t mean giving up; in fact, it's simply not possible to completely rid yourself of expectation. However, it is possible to pause and re-establish a relationship with the moment. Not trying to force joy, but learning to receive it. Not trying to recreate the magic, but allowing the newness of now to surprise you.

References

Schultz, W. (1997). The role of dopamine in reward prediction. Journal of Neurophysiology.

de la Fuente-Fernández et al. (2001). Expectation and dopamine release: Mechanism of the placebo effect in Parkinson’s disease. Science.

Zubieta, J.-K. et al. (2005). Placebo effects mediated by endogenous opioid activity on mu-opioid receptors. Journal of Neuroscience.

Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

Disner, S. G., et al. (2011). Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the Classroom.

Lembke, A. (2021). Dopamine Nation: Finding Balance in the Age of Indulgence. Dutton.

advertisement
More from Kyle Davies BSc MPhil CPsychol
More from Psychology Today