Richard Yonck

The Intelligence Report

Autism

Vaccinations: The Intelligent Choice?

Does an MMR-autism link really exist?

Posted Mar 25, 2011

Syringe

Vaccinations save lives

The idea of a link between MMR vaccinations and autism can be traced to two events. First was the elimination of ethyl mercury (thiomersal) from vaccines as a precautionary measure by pharmaceutical companies. To some, this was perceived as admission a problem existed and a small number of people responded as such. The second event was a UK study by Andrew Wakefield that was published in The Lancet in 1998. Wakefield's study drew links between MMR vaccinations and autism based on highly questionable data. In 2010, Wakefield was determined to have manipulated the study data as well as having acted unethically by the General Medical Council (the medical licensing authority in the UK). The Lancet paper was retracted and Wakefield was disbarred. Today, the scientific consensus remains that no evidence exists to link the MMR vaccine to autism.

Yet anti-vaccination believers remain steadfast, unwilling to accept the preponderance of evidence contradicting their stance. Why?

Human beings are pattern finders. The nature of much of our intelligence is based on our ability to identify patterns in our environment. An animal slinking toward us on the savannah. The face of a friend in a crowd. The identification of seasonal weather patterns. Developing this ability gave us a tremendous advantage. It increased our chances of survival as individuals and as a species.

Unfortunately, this ability can also lead us to erroneous beliefs. The world is full of chaotic, random events, yet our drive to find patterns motivates us to give them form. We see faces in clouds. We believe in winning streaks at the roulette wheel. And sometimes, we find cause-and-effect relationships where none exist.

Millions of children receive immunizations every year. Some of these children will go on to be professional athletes. Others will become doctors. And unfortunately, some will develop autism. But this doesn't mean there is a causal link between any of these and being vaccinated. Given a large enough statistical sampling, any number of correlative relationships are possible. This is why it's important to distinguish between causation and correlation. Or to put it another way: Correlation sees every pattern. Causation sees the correct pattern.

Then why are autism cases on the rise, anti-vaccine proponents often ask? Autism diagnosis is based on behavior rather than cause. In recent years, a broadening of the definition of autism to encompass a number of autism spectrum disorders may be the reason for the statistical jump. But even if autism really is on the increase, this doesn't mean the rise is being caused by vaccinations.

Confirmation bias goes a long way in keeping the myth of a vaccine-autism link alive. Proponents continue to seek out and share only information that supports their belief, disregarding scientific evidence or statistical analysis that contradicts their stance. The prevalence and public acceptance of conspiracy theories has skyrocketed with the growth of the internet. Unfortunately, this has created fertile ground in which groups like the anti-vaccine movement can grow and persist.

The reason the aforementioned legislation is important is because a number of the diseases vaccinations protect against are on the rise. In 2006, there were 55 reported cases of measles in the entire U.S. The first six months of 2008 saw that number jump to 131 cases, of which 91% were unvaccinated. In 2010, whooping cough deaths in California leapt to a sixty year high.

This isn't just a question of individual choice. Because of the way pathogens are transmitted within a population, achieving a high rate of immunization leads to something referred to as "herd immunity". Notice in the 2008 measles numbers that 9% of the infected were vaccinated (though some had not received their second dose.) While no vaccine will protect 100% of the population, it's safe to assume far fewer would have been infected if vaccination rates were higher.

Vaccinations are one of the major health achievements of the 20th century. Without them, our citizens would still be ravaged by smallpox, polio, tuberculosis and many other terrible diseases. The decision to try to educate people about the correct risks and benefits of immunization is a wise step in the right direction. Ultimately, the decision to vaccinate becomes not just a question of personal responsibility, but of social responsibility as well.

(Written in honor of World TB Day (March 24) and my grandmother, Alpharetta Yonck, who died of tuberculosis in 1935 at the age of 19.)

Addendum: The Seattle Times also recently invited me to be a guest columnist, publishing this article as a "Special to the Times." (4/10/2011)