The Psychosocial Road to Road Rage

Source: ghana4ever / Unsplash

Why do some people suddenly see red while driving? Road rage happens when motorists’ uncontrolled anger, provoked by other motorists’ actions, manifests in aggression or violence. Such acts can escalate within seconds but alter lives forever. Recent examples in the United States have ranged from repeated, aggressive braking in front of a moving truck to a grocery store parking lot shooting. Pervasive and striking, road rage has even become a cultural phenomenon over time. Consider King Oedipus’s slaying his father at a crossroads, or the opening chase of Netflix’s Beef.

Despite its real, devastating impacts across the United States, road rage is only explicitly penalized in a few states, like Utah. The scarcity of not only legal but also clinical treatment guidelines is unsurprising when research remains limited. As a psychiatrist, for example, I have met patients with histories of such behaviors, but not yet colleagues in my profession with expertise on this issue. One thing appears clear, however: Road rage is multifactorial and not traceable to any single cause or diagnosis.

Addressing road rage, a set of outward behaviors, and not a mental illness in and of itself, through treatment and public policy requires considering intersecting psychological and societal factors. Forms of unsafe conduct that appear similar on the surface might arise from different underlying causes.

Overflowing psychosocial stress

Road rage represents anger, which itself can be a “secondary emotion.” Anger, including in motorists, often masks deeper feelings such as overwhelming frustration, anxiety, disgust, or fear. Despite its associated risks, the “rage” in road rage may sometimes feel more acceptable to express than vulnerable emotions do. This especially applies to men due to social norms of masculinity.

Most motorists do not reflexively tap into aggression upon encountering bad drivers. Yet, a subset of drivers with lower baseline frustration tolerance, higher impulsivity, and significant chronic stress levels have more susceptibility to overreact. Their outward displacement of aggression can even become habitual if unaddressed. Depending on one’s social environment, various types of cumulative stress further this propensity for bellicosity. Witnessing others’ reckless and improper, though not ill-willed, violations of communal traffic norms—cutting others off, failing to yield right of way, speedily drifting between lanes—could then set off at-risk individuals’ unbridled fury.

Besides common stressors from work, personal relations, and financial obligations, structural issues can exacerbate drivers’ stress. Road rage incidents are not uniformly distributed across highways and streets. For example, they occur less often on open country roads. Urban sprawl and long commute distances, inflexible work schedules, poorly designed intersections and congested roads, and other infrastructural causes of heavy traffic all add to motorists’ stress. These are hard to avoid in the United States, where public transit services are often underfunded even in metropolitan areas. Individualistic, competitive values woven into American culture may embolden entitled drivers to prioritize personal convenience over the collective safety of others. Widespread social disconnection and the semi-anonymity of driving exacerbate this disregard.

Of course, only some motorists demonstrate aggression upon facing environmental stressors shared by everyone else. Per the stress bucket model, for various biological and situational reasons, people have different baseline capacities for stably holding stress. Some people’s metaphorical buckets are relentlessly filled by unpredictable life stressors. Some buckets also have inefficient release valves, representing unhealthy coping patterns. When these containers overflow, excess stress can be displaced into maladaptive responses such as aggression. Applied to road rage, this model highlights individual vulnerabilities, but also implores public policy to mitigate drivers’ structural stressors and, thus, the chance of already high-risk stress buckets to oversaturate.

Self-preservation

Beyond pent-up psychosocial stress, road rage may arise from triggered, intensely personal urges to stand up for oneself. While dangerously disproportionate, these reactions can be intended to protect people’s self-image or even, ironically, their safety. Road rage is thus not always a form of “affective aggression” blindly, impulsively reactive to stressors, but also sometimes an “instrumental aggression” motivated to dominate or deter others.

Being inconvenienced by other motorists can feel intrusive. Yet, how personally one takes it may reflect the extent of their identity being attached to driving. Sitting behind the wheel may not always be just goal-oriented to reaching a destination. Beyond viewing car ownership as normative, many Americans place deep pride in their vehicles, which can function as visual, symbolic extensions of their identity, self-esteem, and personal space. Cars’ longstanding cultural significance in the United States of freedom, mobility, and individuality further promotes this psychological attachment.

Anger Essential Reads

The Venting Trap: Why Letting It Out Makes It Worse

4 Tips to Stop Fighting and Be Friends

For people who take driving personally, inconsiderate roadway behaviors can be felt as insulting, devaluing, and infringing upon their autonomy. It does not take long for these perceptions to escalate. Road rage flares up before one even sees who the other driver is. Here, the impulse toward aggression might serve to settle a score, right a wrong, deter further perceived impudence, or otherwise recover one’s pride. Depending on one’s geographic location, norms of “honor culture” may even legitimize this retribution-seeking, to an extent.

Finally, road rage can serve self-preservation in its most primal, survivalist sense for those with traumatic histories. Everyone in driving school will hear that driving carries risks; this is self-evident with steering a multi-ton, metal enclosure at many dozens of miles per hour. Perhaps fewer people have heard of motor vehicle incidents’ psychiatric effects. A meta-analysis study suggests that more than 22 percent of traffic accident survivors will develop posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This condition’s symptoms, especially in men, often manifest as irritability and anger when triggered by trauma reminders, including traffic-related cues. Although evolutionarily channeled toward defending oneself, this traumatic rage is less adaptive in today’s civilian society, especially while on the road.

What’s one to do?

Road rage remains an underregulated issue. There is much room for psychiatrists, other mental health professionals, social scientists, and policymakers to research, collaborate, and create safer roadways. In the meantime, someone at risk for road rage can:

• If emotionally overwhelmed, pull over and take a break.
• Practice a mindset of not taking driving personally or emotionally. Strangers’ bad driving is usually not intended to demean or challenge others, nor is it worth a response. Reactive aggression can produce long-term, disastrous consequences for otherwise impermanent, trivial traffic encounters. Let it go.
• Disengage and avoid giving eye contact, or any response, if another driver appears confrontational and aggressive.
• Lower one’s expectations for how others should drive. Frustration increases as expectations exceed reality.
• Plan to arrive early if rushing to work, classes, or meetings has contributed to stressful commutes.
• If feasible, consider relying more on biking or public transportation.
• Take a defensive driving course. Beyond safer driving, completion can deduct license points or even lower one’s auto insurance premium.
• Regardless of one’s driving, work with a therapist or psychiatrist if experiencing mood, anxiety, or other mental health symptoms.

Road rage is very much a psychosocial phenomenon, but not an inevitable one.