Communication Is the Heartbeat of Relationship
How to break through the impasse.
Posted Jan 05, 2012
If communication is indeed the heartbeat of relationships, it's little wonder that most relations are on coronary care. Once again, we are confronted with another absurd reality. Our culture deprives us of the most fundamental education that we require to succeed in our relationships. Learning the subtleties and nuances of meaningful and effective communication is the cornerstone of successfully relating.
In effective communication, which incidentally is a very rare event, we need to first establish a shared meaning around the words, constructs, and ideas that we are discussing and then further that meaning in a coherent flow of dialogue. Such a skill set enables relationships to thrive, businesses and organizations to be more productive, and nations to create and sustain peace. What could possibly be more essential?
We take for granted that our words convey exactly what we intend them to. This is a particularly misinformed assumption. I have observed that, upon deeper scrutiny, words, let alone concepts, tend not to be received in the way the messenger intends. By the time a few sentences have passed, we may have a totally missed communication. How often do we pause and considerately ask the other what they mean by the word or words they are using?
Although this problem is more glaring in a confrontational discourse, it impacts amicable conversations as well. "You don't know how to be intimate," she exclaims. He retorts, "I don't know how to be intimate? You're so angry and cold; who would ever want to be intimate with you?" In the following minutes, this couple is off to the races, pushing buttons and hurling invectives.
They are arguing around the word "intimate." Yet, no one has bothered to share or inquire what intimate suggests. She might be referring to emotional intimacy; he might be thinking of sexual intimacy. This is a common disconnect.
Yet the problem runs deeper. Let's give them the benefit of the doubt and assume they are fighting about whether he can or cannot be emotionally intimate. Have they ever discussed the concept of emotional intimacy and reached a shared meaning? This would be most unlikely.
How can we discuss or argue the virtues of something when we are speaking different languages? When we seek to learn a new language, we must first understand what the word means when it is translated into our native language. That said, the subtleties and nuances might still be different, so we need to come to appreciate these differences to communicate well.
Yet, we don't bother to discern those more subtle differences when we both speak the same language. We assume the words have the same meaning for each of us. They ordinarily don't.
Let's move this couple into the art of coherent communicating. His more proper response to her accusation might be to inquire as to what she means by the word "intimate." This would require that his button not be pushed in a reactive and defensive manner and that he respond in a balanced and sensible way.
After all, his partner is upset with him. Why not find out what is truly troubling her? If he doesn't fully appreciate what she is feeling and trying to communicate, how can they ever move to resolve the emotional upset?
So, in this instance, he might elect not to be right, not to prove her wrong, and to try to comprehend what is stirring her upset. A more educated response might sound like, "Yikes, that feels hurtful. Please tell me what you mean by intimate, and how you feel I'm failing you?" That response might actually foster a generative discussion instead of breaking down into yet another meaningless argument.
Of course, the problem lies with her as well as with him. He'd have to be very far along in his shared meaning and dialogue education to be able to reflectively inquire as to her meaning rather than simply react. To further the possibility of meaningful conversation, she might have begun with, "I'm really feeling sad and shut down that you don't share your more private thoughts and feelings with me. I feel like we're strangers just going through life together, but not really connecting. Do you feel the same about me?" Imagine how differently that conversation might flow.
Language only represents thoughts, beliefs, and experiences and should not be taken as a literal or objective reality. Words don't mean the same thing to all of us. In fact, they ordinarily evoke differing connotations based upon each individual's experiences. We often end up in disagreements without clarifying what it is that we're arguing about.
Just consider the confusion around the word "love." One person says to the other, "I love you." The other person responds, "No, you don't." Are they speaking of loving one another or being in love: eros? Is anyone clarifying? Ordinarily, we aren't.
In the Greek language, there are numerous words for love. The Greeks clearly appreciate the myriad nuances to this word. We need to take the time to illuminate and appreciate what the other truly means by the word. What sense does it make to argue about whether you are intimate or loving if we're talking about two different things? We must look beyond the word—the label—and find shared meaning in our communications.
When we ask one another what the word or concept means, we are, in fact, being very intimate and respectful. Taking the time to inquire as to what the other is truly intending to communicate honors the exchange. Sharing meaning is a precursor to an intimate exchange and opens the doorway to genuine dialogue.
This post was excerpted in part from Mel's new book, The Possibility Principle: How Quantum Physics Can Improve the Way You Think, Live and Love.