The Pro-Mortem exercise lets a team pin down what success would look like. It takes little time to run, but has a considerable payoff. When the exercise is over, the team members are happily surprised by the kinds of impact their project can have.
Personnel evaluations are often painful, for the supervisor and for the employee. Instead of evaluating the person, why not evaluate the decisions? List the decisions the person made during the year and review how they got made and how they turned out. This approach turns a critical conversation into a collaborative one, driven by curiosity.
What would it look like to view teaching as a process of creating insights? Here are 6 ideas: diagnosing why students are confused, helping students unlearn mistaken beliefs, encouraging students to pursue their own feedback, anticipating knowledge shields and breaking through them, working through the three pathways to insight, and promoting an insight stance.
Organizations are usually driven by a desire to cut errors and increase efficiency, and while these goals are important, they aren't enough. Organizations also need to foster discoveries. They can help workers adopt an Insight Stance by changing how they conduct progress reviews and how they react to conflicts and confusions.
Perhaps there is a way to boost insights. The Insight Stance is a mindset we can adopt to prepare ourselves to make discoveries. In contrast to other mindsets such as being critical of new ideas,or letting our minds wander, the Insight Stance is an active and curious approach to encounters and events. It uses the pathways that lead to insights.
This first of a 2-part discussion of ways to increase insights reviews of 5 popular ideas: increase swirl, encourage failures, be open to new ideas, apply critical thinking, and get into a quiet, meditative mood. Each suggestion has some unfortunate drawbacks. Assessing their strengths and limits may provide suggestions for a better strategy, to be described in Part II.
Companies are happy to rely on cash cows—products or services that continually attract loyal customers—but when it is time to phase out the cash cows, corporate leaders often lose their nerve. This cowardice afflicts even the high flyers like Kodak, Encyclopedia Brittanica and, in the latest surprising example, Microsoft.
Conventional wisdom about making better judgments and decisions consists of methods for reducing biases and errors. But this is a defensive strategy, playing not to lose.
We can do better. By trying to foster insights and discoveries, we can play to win.
I have now had two years to reflect on my book Seeing What Others Don't. I am pleased with the book, but there are a number of ways I would change it if I had the chance. I would make a small but important modification in the model of insight, and I would add much more material about ways to foster insights.
We are supposed to make decisions based on the degree to which the competing options let us achieve our goals. But that's a myth. We often make tough choices based on showstoppers—issues that have little to do with our goals. We are opportunistic decision makers, not rational ones.
An attempt to train social skills isn't as successful as expected, but the numbers don't make sense. To sort out what went wrong, you have to look beyond the statistics and try to imagine how the participants in the study were thinking.
Our ability to create insights is critical for innovation and adaptation. Otherwise we would remain stuck in mental ruts formed over our lifetime. Insights let us see things in new ways. Many people, however, have the wrong ideas about insights. Here is a short test, only 12 items, to assess your knowledge of insights.
Breakdowns in Common Ground create pernicious confusion because people believe they are on the same wavelength even though they aren't. These breakdowns often arise when people toss around ambiguous phrases like "leadership problem." A two-step correction is to first spot these verbal land mines and second dismantle them using stories and examples.
We are told to define our goal ahead of time and build a plan to reach it, an approach sometimes called Management by Objectives. But that advice is impossible when we are in complex situations facing Wicked Problems. Instead, we need to use use Management by Discovery to gain insights about our goal as we try to reach it.
Tempted by how-to books to adopt a business innovation? The underlying idea may be a good one. But misapplying a new idea or introducing it in the wrong place can absorb time and resources that could have been better spent. How could you discern which ideas might help you and which won’t? Ask this question: “For this to work here, what must be true?
Big Data, the use of massive amounts of data to reveal consumer preferences, offers many exciting possibilities. However, number crunching isn't the same as gaining insights. Big Data approaches usually rely on algorithms for capturing trends but insights arise when we spot anomalies that challenge the beliefs of the researchers and the data analysts.
The Causal Landscape is a method for escaping from simplistic, single-cause explanations for conditions such as depression. It depicts a wide array of contributing causes but then highlights the few causes that have the greatest impact and are easiest to change.
The Causal Landscape is a method for highlighting the causes worth addressing, avoiding simplistic single-cause explanations as well as overly complicated and exhaustive explanations. This expansion of the Causal Landscape should make it a more useful tool for diagnosing problems and for turning those diagnoses into action.
An important type of insights is to spot leverage points —ways to make things happen by using little effort to achieve powerful results. These kinds of discoveries fit into the Triple Path model of insight as a form of creative desperation, noticing implications that other people miss. These insights depend on reading the situation but also knowing ones own abilities.
Should we be advising young people to follow their dreams? The advice encourages self-indulgence, and may direct many graduates into unrealistic career paths that are poorly compensated. And the advice ignores the importance of luck. It may be better to learn to make the best of situations, although one-line slogans are too simplistic to guide career choices.
Complex situations contain multiple causes yet we often want a simple 1-2 word explanation about why something happened. The causal landscape is a hybrid format that portrays the wide array of relevant causes, to help people escape from their single-cause mindset, but highlights the few causes that matter the most and can direct our actions.
Each of the paths to insight — connections, contradictions, and creative desperation — works in different ways and relies on its own set of techniques. That's why there aren't any universal strategies for making discoveries. And it is why the pursuit of insights depends so heavily on using the appropriate methods.
My research has uncovered three different pathways for gaining insights: making connections; spotting contradictions; and a creative desperation path in which we break free from flawed assumptions. Because each insight path is affected by different barriers, there is no universal remedy to free us from the mental shackles that stifle insights.
We think of scientists as testing hypothesis by setting up experimental and control groups and collecting data to support their hypotheses. But when that happens, scientists haven't learned much they didn't already know. Insights arise at all the other stages in the scientific method except the most conventional one of testing and supporting hypotheses.
Effective teams handle stress by: building and repairing common ground, stating and updating goals, increasing predictability, clarifying roles, and using anticipatory thinking. Team decision-making under stress depends on the team's ability to adapt quickly to unexpected events.
The forces that create insights are critical for shaking us out of comfortable routines. Without these forces, our thinking would grow more and more stereotyped and rigid. Therefore, the process of discovery gets stamped in: we experience an insight rush each time we make a discovery, motivating us to pursue more insights.
We often get angry and frustrated when another person refuses to grant our simple requests. But usually there's more to the story, if only we could find a way into that person's thought processes. A simple skeleton key suggests four avenues to investigate.
One of the greatest barriers to insight is holding on to a flawed assumption. But these assumptions are usually unconscious. We don't even know we're making them. So they're difficult to spot and to correct. Fortunately, we have a few strategies that can help us escape the trap of a flawed and unconscious assumption.