The Benefits of Pet-Related Discussions in Therapy and Beyond

Talking about pets is receiving increasing attention. Over 90 percent of people in the U.S. consider their pets part of the family and, at times, silent witnesses to life's most challenging and best moments. Notably, pets are a meaningful source of emotional support for children and adults, and these relationships often reflect people's emotional needs and relational patterns.

Some individuals report feeling more empathy for animals than for people, and others may even feel more emotionally connected to their companion animals than to close relatives like siblings, which is particularly noticeable among younger generations.

However, while this topic is often seen as emotionally appealing, it is not always taken seriously. Despite the growing evidence of the impact of companion animals on people's emotional lives, the relationships clients share with their pets are frequently overlooked in mental health practice and other clinical settings.

Some may ask: Do these themes really belong in clinical settings? Are pet-related conversations clinically relevant? The short answer is yes—and failing to make space for these conversations may be more harmful than one might think.

Source: Renata Roma

Why Pet-Related Conversations Matter for Clients and Clinicians

An essential part of clinical work involves capturing a comprehensive view of clients' ecosystems. However, we tend to think of important relationships strictly in human terms, and this bias can be detrimental when companion animals are a vital part of that landscape. Many people form bonds with animals that are complex and emotionally significant. So, why do clinicians still hesitate to give these relationships the attention they deserve in clinical work? A shift in perspective by making room for pet-related conversations can have a positive impact on therapy and other clinical contexts for several reasons:

1. Validate Emotional Bonds: Younger generations prefer pets over children, and many people see their pets as children. Dismissing this part of clients' lives can inadvertently reinforce the assumption that the emotional connection clients build with their companion animals is something to be hidden or put aside.

Research shows that some people downplay the role of their pets when this topic is addressed in daily interactions, for fear of social judgment. When clinicians open space to pet-related conversations, they may help clients feel validated. At the same time, this approach challenges the belief that this dimension of clients' lives should be kept unspoken. Directly asking, "Do you have a pet at home?" or showing curiosity when the topic spontaneously emerges in conversation are simple ways to start.

2. Build Therapeutic Trust: Research shows that asking about pets before medical procedures can mitigate anxiety. In clinical settings, a similar effect is observed: People tend to be more at ease when asked about the companion animals in their lives, which can strengthen the therapeutic alliance.

Moreover, when clinicians intentionally add pet-related questions in intake, assessments, or the therapeutic process itself, clients may feel more open to sharing information about their physical and mental health. Hence, addressing these themes can help clinicians comprehensively understand clients' struggles and dynamics. To be clear, considering the client's unique circumstances may deepen clinical insights and result in more holistic and effective interventions.

3. Gain Clinical Insights: Although companion animals are often meaningful sources of emotional and social support, this is a complex relationship with ups and downs. Living with pets may include several challenging situations related to the animal's health or behavioural issues. Pet grief, for example, is often socially minimized and invalidated. When someone loses a pet, they are usually expected to return to their routines with little opportunity to acknowledge or process their pain. Looking further, clients with severe psychological problems may find it challenging to care for their pets, adding to feelings of worry and guilt.

Understanding such complex dynamics can help clinicians identify potential target areas for therapy. It can also offer key information about clients' social support systems and ways to relate to others. At the same time, pet-related discussions can help clients feel more comfortable addressing sensitive topics such as domestic violence. In these situations, they may start describing violence against their pets before feeling comfortable talking about violence against themselves. Being attentive and open when these themes emerge can open the door for clinically relevant conversations.

Reframing the Clinical Lens

Therapeutic spaces should make space for whatever holds emotional meaning for clients. With this premise in mind, clinicians often ask about family, friendships, and support systems. Considering the evolving role of companion animals in families, why not include pet-related questions?

Therapy Essential Reads

The Rise of Equine-Assisted Therapy

Clinical Wisdom: Why Myths Still Matter

By dismissing these themes, clinicians risk reinforcing an implicit bias—one rooted in the anthropocentric perspective that privileges human relationships as inherently more important. From this view, clients' bonds with their pets are seen as secondary or not clinically meaningful.

This kind of bias can be damaging, as it may unintentionally make clients feel that an essential part of their lives is being dismissed or misunderstood. It can also lead clinicians to miss key information that could be clinically relevant, ultimately limiting their ability to see the client more comprehensively. Adopting a broader lens can enhance the therapeutic work and provide new insights into the emotional, social, and relational roles pets play in clients' lives.

To find a therapist, visit the Psychology Today Therapy Directory.