How Anger Affects Intimate Relationships
The 10 most common anger styles and how most partners respond to them.
Posted Aug 30, 2019
Angry exchanges are bound to happen between intimate partners. Ranging from mild to explosive, they often likely to create cumulative damage over time.
Anger is a “puffer-fish” phenomena: It serves to make people feel more powerful when they can’t express their more vulnerable, underlying emotions. Most often they are preceded by feelings of frustration, hurt, unmet needs, or perceived injustice.
Because the partners on the other end of angry expressions cannot see those hidden feelings, they too often react defensively to the anger itself. The result is a downward spiral with two upset people misunderstanding the underlying reasons for why they are in dispute.
In working with couples for over four decades, I have often witnessed these angry exchange patterns and noted how predictable they have become. Each partner typically employs a particular anger style and response, and activates the other partner’s similar predictable reaction.
So many couples are not conscious that their angry interactions are foreseeable and reciprocal. They also too often don’t realize the underlying, more vulnerable emotions that drive them. Once partners are in an angry interaction, they rapidly go from friends to adversaries and cannot see beyond each of their own emotional survivals.
For couples to successfully resolve their differences, they must stop using unsuccessful angry exchanges. Instead, they need to understand what underlying emotions are driving those angry emotions, how they each traditionally express them, and what effect they have on the other partner.
The easiest first step to eliminate negative angry patterns is for each partner to identify his or her anger style and what deeper and vulnerable emotions he or she may be feeling underneath. The second is to become aware of their effect on the other partner. It is only then that angry emotions can be understood and replaced by more successful resolution behaviors. Expressing differences from a calm place without fear of being erased is crucial to any more positive outcome.
Below I list he 10 most common anger styles and how most partners respond to them. Some people use only one while others may employ a pattern that utilizes several at the same time. Whichever pattern is employed, they all appear to have the same goal: to get the other partner to do what the angry partner needed, but could not successfully obtain before his or her anger became the cover-up vehicle.
This anger style is often more of a bark rather than a bite. Still, this type of angry expression is meant as a warning sign: "Do not approach.” There are many reasons why people employ this rapid-fire reaction, and it is critical that the partner who barks understands why he or she is pushing away all attempts by the other partner to connect.
Most partners on the other end of this anger style interpret these bursts of negative emotion as clear signs to back away but will initially try to keep the interaction going. If they cannot get resolution and the snapping becomes a consistent pattern, they will eventually pull away or respond with their own anger style.
Some people can only express their resentment by sniping, sarcasm, criticism, nagging, mean-spirited teasing, or snarky comments. They want their needs to be met, yet are unable to ask for them directly, or don’t feel they would be met if they did.
Other partners’ most typical responses to these erosive remarks is to defend by similar counter-attacks, attempting to reverse the constant criticism. Over time, they are likely to become inured to this behavior, and seek more positive support from others.
3. Slow Burn and Eruption
Perhaps because they have difficulty asking for what they want, some partners swallow their resentments, disappointments, and thwarted desires until they can no longer tolerate the way they feel. At that point, they are likely to erupt into a tirade of rageful accusations and explosive threats.
The other partner may have no idea that these feelings are brewing prior to the venting. Or, if they do sense, they may try to resolve them before the blow-up. In any case, these types of eruptions often cause serious cumulative damage.
4. Rapid-Fire Extermination
This mode appears intended to annihilate the other partner’s status in the relationship. It is a focused attack, a verbal machine gun, using whatever is more likely to undermine and devalue any defense on the part of the other partner. Partners who use this anger style need to win at any cost by silencing the other, then immediately disconnecting.
If they are not triggered into their own angry reaction, the partners on the other side of the rapid-fire exterminator have learned over time to stay silent during the tirades. They know that it has a predictable pattern of intensity and duration, and often just wait it out.
5. Hit and Run
Angry partners who are fearful of their partner’s response often wait to express their own negative feelings when they can rapidly disconnect before facing retaliation. They depend on their partner being less defensive at a later time.
These styles can cause the other partner to become increasingly resentful. It depends a lot on how quickly the attacked partner recuperates, or whether he or she becomes a counter-predator when the relationship resumes.
6. Cold Withdrawal
Partners who exhibit this style deploy patronizing, robotic silence during their angry interludes. Their behaviors may last for a short time or for days, and usually do not end until they get what they want.
Partners on the other end can be severely traumatized if they have a history of rejection by others. If they have the confidence to weather the other’s attempt to control by withdrawal, they can still be available to connect when the boycott ends and the perpetrator has “self-thawed.”
Continuous, repressed anger that is blamed on the other partner can easily turn into martyrdom. Martyrdom is a silent, self-effacing anger style but effectively communicates cumulative distress. People who fall into this behavior are often trying to appease or to adapt to the other’s demands, hoping their pain will be recognized without their having to express it directly.
Partners on the other end of martyred anger styles rarely win. They don’t always know what they’ve “done” to cause the silent suffering. Second, they are denied information to help them understand whether to agree or to deny the charges. Third, the martyred partner may actually feel noble when they sacrifice their needs, and become wedded to that role.
Some people cannot bear any kind of angry interactions and will use any means to avoid them. The most typical of those behaviors is to abuse alcohol or other drugs. But any addictive escape behaviors can be just as effective, even those that appear on the outside to be more legitimate like intense working out, spending huge amounts of time committed to work or hobbies. What is in common is the way and when those escapes are utilized.
People on the other end of partners who refuse to engage in any kind of negative interaction know they are being avoided. But their partners’ use behaviors that do not lend themselves to resolution. The escape experiences are evidently preferable to engaging, and often impossible to challenge.
9. Bank Shots
Some partners express anger through “bank shots” by bringing in the “troops” for additional support during an angry interaction. When they feel they are losing an argument, they bring in the opinions of others their partners respect.
The unfortunate people on the other end of these anger strategies often feel self-doubt when confronted by “all the others" who feel the same way about them as their partner does. They begin to wonder whether their own thoughts and feelings have merit, and then give in.
This style is the most damaging to a relationship. Partners who use it are intentional in their goal to inflict damage and to vanquish the other. They do so by using wipe-out statements, character assassination, attacks on the other’s most vulnerable states, and threats of abandonment or exile. In their focus to retaliate, they intend to annihilate the other any way they can.
If the other partner argues back, they escalate their need to win. They may even try to bait them if they don’t. Many of the attacked partners remain silent, hoping to lessen the intensity and duration of the tirade. Others attempt to disconnect, but will have trouble doing so until the predating partner feels they have suffered enough.
Anger styles are predominantly learned from early childhood but can also be caused by mood disorders such as depression or other genetic inheritances. They are also affected by a person’s current underlying state, prior upsets, or triggers from past negative experiences. If people can learn to understand and share the underlying drivers for their anger before they express it unsuccessfully, most partners do respond positively to listening and caring for those underlying vulnerabilities, and will strive to help heal them.
Learn more at heroiclove.com.
Facebook image: Daniel M Ernst/Shutterstock