Education
To Type or to Write, That Is the Question
At the highest level of learning, should you type or write by hand?
Posted December 20, 2025 Reviewed by Abigail Fagan
Key points
- Research compared university students who typed lecture notes on laptops with those who wrote them by hand.
- Typers recorded more words during the lectures than those who wrote by hand.
- Neuroscience finds that if education is about empowering minds, then handwriting must be taught and continued.
Research by Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014) compared students who typed lecture notes on laptops with those who wrote them by hand during the same time.
In terms of immediate results, laptop users typed and recorded more words during the lecture, and their notes were almost word-for-word transcripts of the lecture. The initial assumption was that this would ultimately be beneficial for these students compared with those who were handwriting their notes.
After the lectures, the two groups of students in this study were tested on the information presented. The results showed that students who wrote by hand during lectures scored significantly higher on the tests than those who typed (Mueller & Oppenheimer, 2014).
The immediate question was: “Why was this the case?” Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014) found that students who handwrote their notes were consistently engaged in higher-level thinking. This meant that throughout their lectures, these students were actively listening and intellectually analyzing what to record. This led to higher knowledge-based outcomes (Luo et al., 2018; Morehead et al., 2019).
Luo et al. (2018) found that handwritten notes contained more meaningful content (such as deeper thought and greater intellectual structure), resulting in higher scores on knowledge-based tests.
Morehead et al. (2019) confirmed that the benefits of handwriting are most evident when students are assessed on higher-order conceptual understanding rather than on memorizing facts.
These studies confirm that handwriting is an essential cognitive process and a highly beneficial intellectual activity that enhances learning at advanced levels of education, that begins from the first day of school and continues thereafter.
Handwriting Helps to Advance Knowledge and Enhance Ideas
This evidence from university classrooms illustrates a broader principle: handwriting for note‑taking is a deeper thinking skill. When students write by hand, they actively select and synthesize information.
This process requires them to decide what is essential, how ideas connect, and how best to represent them in their own words. The research indicates that this type of engagement develops, advances, and enhances critical thinking (defined as the ability to analyze, evaluate, and make reasoned, detailed judgments), because handwriting forces students to process information conceptually rather than transcribe it verbatim (Mueller & Oppenheimer, 2014; Luo et al., 2018; Morehead et al., 2019).
The research also indicates that this process helps to develop higher‑order thinking, which involves analyzing, applying, synthesizing, and evaluating information. This then develops a deeper knowledge potential. Additionally, as confirmed by classroom studies and evidence from neuroscience, handwriting activates broader brain networks than typing (James & Engelhardt, 2012; Van der Weel & Van der Meer, 2024).
Building on this, studies by Alonso (2015), Mangen and Balsvik (2016), Arnold et al. (2017) and Van der Weel and Van der Meer (2024) explain that “the ongoing substitution of handwriting by typewriting in almost every educational setting may seem somewhat misguided, as it could” negatively affect the learning process.
However, Van der Weel and Van der Meer (2024) emphasise the importance of staying current in this ever-changing digital world. With this in mind, they state that children must, first and foremost, learn handwriting. Only after they are absolutely proficient, especially at complex narrative handwriting, should typing be considered.
Being Aware of When to Write by Hand or Type Is Crucial
That is because, according to Van der Weel and Van der Meer (2024), “the neural connectivity patterns underlying handwriting and typewriting are distinctly different. Hence, being aware of when to write by hand or use a digital device is crucial, whether it is to take lecture notes to learn new concepts or to write longer essays.”
Therefore, it is vital to recognize that neuroscience confirms that if education is about empowering minds, then handwriting must be taught, beginning with the biomechanically efficient tripod grip, and then continually practised and used thereafter.
This is all about developing advanced, sophisticated narrative writing skills that shape and enhance the brain and mind, helping to cultivate highly intellectual, analytical, and critical thinkers. All of which is aimed at preparing students to be complex, higher-order thinkers for life (Van der Weel & Van der Meer, 2024).
The Biomechanical Efficiency of the Tripod Grip
These university findings highlight the vital importance of teaching handwriting at the start of the education journey. Central to this is the tripod grip. Research shows that the tripod grip provides the biomechanical, ergonomic, and neurobiological foundations necessary for developing efficient and intellectually effective narrative handwriting skills (Lust & Donica, 2011).
Research in early childhood supports this development. Dinehart and Manfra (2013) found that fine motor skills, including the tripod grip and handwriting, in preschoolers predict academic achievement. Longcamp et al. (2005) showed that continuous handwriting practice enhances letter recognition, which in turn advances higher-order complex narrative reading and writing more effectively than typing.
Furthermore, research by James and Engelhardt (2012) found that handwriting experience activates brain regions associated with literacy in pre-literate children. Consequently, handwriting supports the development of neuromuscular motor skills and the neurological foundation necessary for both immediate and long-term cognitive and intellectual growth and academic achievement.
Handwriting Rewires the Brain
Neuroscience confirms that handwriting is more than a skill; it rewires the brain. Functional imaging studies show that writing by hand activates areas linked to memory, language, and executive function, creating new and stronger neural pathways that support higher-order thinking. This enhances critical and comprehensive connections between simple and complex ideas and evaluation of sophisticated information compared with typing (James, 2010; James & Engelhardt, 2012; Planton et al., 2013).
To Type or to Write? Here is the Answer!
The research indicates that handwriting yields higher levels of thinking and associated intellectual benefits. As the research also confirms, these benefits can only be developed through ongoing handwriting practices that require sustained mental and physical effort.
As the research confirmed, when self-motivated effort is made to engage with complex ideas, articulate nuanced arguments, and generate original insights, the potential for creativity, increased knowledge, and intellectual advancement begins to emerge. Choices have consequences (Purje, 2014).
References
Alonso, M. A. P. (2015). Metacognition and sensorimotor components underlying the process of handwriting and keyboarding and their impact on learning. An analysis from the perspective of embodied psychology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 263-269.
Arnold, K. M., Umanath, S., Thio, K., Reilly, W. B., McDaniel, M. A., & Marsh, E. J. (2017). Understanding the cognitive processes involved in writing to learn. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(2), 115-127.
Dinehart, L. H. (2015). Handwriting in early childhood education: Current research and future implications. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(1), 97-118.
James, K. H. (2010). Sensori‐motor experience leads to changes in visual processing in the developing brain. Developmental Science, 13(2), 279-288.
James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1(1), 32-42.
Longcamp, M., Zerbato-Poudou, M. T., & Velay, J. L. (2005). The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta Psychologica, 119(1), 67-79.
Luo, L., Kiewra, K. A., Flanigan, A. E., & Peteranetz, M. S. (2018). Laptop versus longhand note taking: Effects on lecture notes and achievement. Instructional Science, 46(6), 947-971.
Lust, C. A., & Donica, D. K. (2011). Effectiveness of a handwriting readiness program in Head Start: A two-group controlled trial. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(5), 560-568.
Mangen, A., & Balsvik, L. (2016). Pen or keyboard in beginning writing instruction? Some perspectives from embodied cognition. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 5(3), 99-106.
Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2019). How much mightier is the pen than the keyboard for note-taking? A replication and extension of Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014). Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 753-780.
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159-1168.
Planton, S., Jucla, M., Roux, F. E., & Démonet, J. F. (2013). The “handwriting brain”: A meta‑analysis of neuroimaging studies of motor versus orthographic processes. Cortex, 49(10), 2772–2787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.05.011
Van der Weel, F. R., & Van der Meer, A. L. (2024). Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity: a high-density EEG study with implications for the classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1219945.



