Cognitive Dissonance
When Doctors Don’t Have All the Answers
Uncertainty spurs cognitive dissonance, harming patients as well as doctors.
Posted October 21, 2024 Reviewed by Hara Estroff Marano
Key points
- Cognitive dissonance occurs when doctors face questions they can't answer with certainty.
- Honesty about medical limitations strengthens doctor-patient trust and communication.
- Systemic barriers in healthcare, like insurance limits, can prevent optimal care delivery.
- Shared decision-making helps doctors reduce pressure and involves patients in their care choices.
Doctors are often seen as the ultimate authorities in health care, expected to have immediate answers to and solutions for every medical problem. Yet the reality of modern healthcare is more complicated.
Physicians frequently encounter questions they can't answer due to medical uncertainty, lack of sufficient research, or systemic barriers. The result is often cognitive dissonance, the psychological discomfort that arises when one’s actions conflict with self-perception.
For doctors, cognitive dissonance can occur when their professional identity as experts is challenged by medical uncertainty or the limitations of the healthcare system. The dissonance can lead to frustration, defensiveness, and strained doctor-patient relationships. To navigate the challenge, doctors must embrace transparency, acknowledge when they don't have all the answers, and address the systemic issues that limit care.
Cognitive Dissonance in Medicine
Cognitive dissonance, first introduced by Leon Festinger in 1957, refers to the discomfort individuals feel when holding conflicting beliefs or when their actions clash with their values. In the medical profession, dissonance is common when doctors encounter uncertainty in patient care.
Research by Gerrity and colleagues (1992) highlights that uncertainty in medicine is a major source of stress for healthcare providers. Doctors are expected to be experts, yet the complexity of medicine often means they face rare conditions, incomplete information, or questions about treatments that lack clear evidence. Such situations create an internal conflict: The doctor is supposed to know everything, yet they cannot provide a definitive answer.
In response to such dissonance, doctors may react defensively, avoiding discussions that reveal uncertainty or relying on standard responses to maintain the facade of certainty. Unfortunately, such behaviors can distance doctors from their patients and compromise the quality of care.
The Psychological Toll of Uncertainty
The impact of cognitive dissonance on physicians is not just emotional but also behavioral. When doctors experience dissonance, they may become more rigid in their approach, reluctant to explore alternative solutions, or quick to dismiss patient concerns. Studies by Politi and Street (2011) show that many doctors struggle to communicate uncertainty to their patients, often defaulting to vague answers or avoiding the issue altogether. The result may be frustration for both parties.
Physicians are also conditioned to avoid showing vulnerability, reinforcing a culture in which admitting "I don’t know" is seen as a weakness. However, research by Mazor et al. (2004) shows that patients respond positively when doctors are honest about what they do not know. Patients value transparency, even when it means hearing that the doctor doesn't have an immediate solution. In fact, such honesty builds trust and strengthens the doctor-patient relationship.
Systemic Limitations Exacerbating Cognitive Dissonance
The reality is that many of the challenges doctors face in providing optimal care are rooted in systemic issues. According to Donald Berwick (2009), systemic matters such as insurance restrictions, administrative burdens, and time constraints limit the care doctors can provide. Such systemic issues add another layer of cognitive dissonance, as doctors are often unable to offer the level of care they believe is necessary, due to external constraints.
For example, a doctor may know that a patient needs specialized treatment or extended care but may be limited by what insurance will cover. The limitation forces doctors into a moral conflict: They want to provide the best possible care, but the system prevents it. Research on defensive medicine (Summerton, 1995) suggests that some doctors respond to such pressures by avoiding difficult decisions or ordering unnecessary tests to protect themselves from potential legal repercussions.
The frustration caused by systemic barriers to care can also contribute to physician burnout, which Shanafelt et al. (2015) identified as a growing problem in healthcare. Burnout, in turn, reduces a doctor's capacity to manage cognitive dissonance effectively, leading to more defensive behaviors and poorer patient communication.
The Need for Transparency and Shared Decision-Making
Honesty about the limitations of healthcare systems and individual medical knowledge is essential for improving doctor-patient relationships and patient outcomes. Doctors should feel comfortable admitting uncertainty and openly discussing the constraints that affect their ability to deliver care. This is not only a way to manage cognitive dissonance but also a necessary step toward building trust.
Shared decision-making, a model that encourages collaboration between doctors and patients, can help reduce the burden on physicians to always have the right answer. Research by Elwyn et al. (2012) shows that involving patients in the decision-making process improves outcomes and increases patient satisfaction. It allows doctors to engage patients in discussions about possible treatments, risks, and alternative care options, rather than feeling pressured to provide immediate answers or solutions.
For example, if a patient asks about an alternative treatment that the doctor is unfamiliar with, the doctor can respond with, “I’m not sure about that option, but I can look into it or refer you to someone who specializes in it.” This kind of transparency not only reduces cognitive dissonance but also makes the patient feel involved and respected.
Practical Solutions for Addressing Cognitive Dissonance in Healthcare
To navigate the challenges of cognitive dissonance in medicine, healthcare professionals can adopt several practical strategies:
- Acknowledge Uncertainty: Rather than deflecting difficult questions, doctors should embrace the opportunity to discuss uncertainty. This can be as simple as admitting, “I don’t have all the answers, but let’s explore the options together.”
- Educate Patients: By improving patient health literacy, doctors can empower patients to understand the complexities of medical care. Providing reliable resources and encouraging informed decision-making can reduce the pressure doctors feel to have all the answers.
- Advocate for Systemic Change: Addressing systemic barriers, such as insurance limitations and administrative burdens, is crucial for reducing the external pressures that contribute to cognitive dissonance. Doctors can play a role in advocating for healthcare reforms that prioritize patient-centered care.
- Normalize Transparency in Medical Training: Teaching future doctors how to manage uncertainty and be transparent with patients is essential for creating a healthcare culture that values honesty and collaboration over perfectionism.
Conclusion
Cognitive dissonance in healthcare is an unavoidable challenge, but it doesn’t have to undermine the doctor-patient relationship. By acknowledging uncertainty, being transparent about systemic limitations, and embracing shared decision-making, doctors can reduce the internal conflict they feel when confronted with difficult questions. Ultimately, fostering a culture of honesty and collaboration will lead to better outcomes for both doctors and patients.
References
Berwick, D. M. (2009). What ‘patient-centered’ should mean: Confessions of an extremist. Health Affairs, 28(4), w555-w565. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w555
Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, R., Joseph-Williams, N., Lloyd, A., Kinnersley, P., ... & Barry, M. J. (2012). Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(10), 1361-1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Gerrity, M. S., Earp, J. A., DeVellis, R. F., & Light, D. W. (1992). Uncertainty and professional work: Perceptions of physicians in clinical practice. American Journal of Sociology, 97(4), 1022-1051. https://doi.org/10.1086/229861
Mazor, K. M., Simon, S. R., & Gurwitz, J. H. (2004). Communicating with patients about medical errors: A review of the literature. Archives of Internal Medicine, 164(15), 1690-1697. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.15.1690
Summerton, N. (1995). Positive and negative factors in defensive medicine: A questionnaire study of general practitioners. BMJ, 310(6971), 27-29. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6971.27
Shanafelt, T. D., Boone, S., Tan, L., Dyrbye, L. N., Sotile, W., Satele, D., ... & Oreskovich, M. R. (2015). Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 90(12), 1600-1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.023
Politi, M. C., & Street, R. L. (2011). The importance of communication in collaborative decision making: Facilitating shared mind and the management of uncertainty. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(4), 579-584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01549.x