Skip to main content

Verified by Psychology Today

Memory

Memory Training for Modern Minds

Lessons from the intelligence community on memory training.

Key points

  • Memory training dramatically improves recall.
  • Structured techniques like the memory palace and elaborative encoding are highly effective.
  • Professional experience and education alone are not enough.
Memory
Memory
Source: lanych / Adobe stock

In today's high-pressure professional environments, from national security to corporate leadership, memory is a strategic asset. Yet, despite its centrality to decision-making,1 most modern workplaces still treat memory enhancement as an afterthought. A recent study within the U.S. intelligence community offers compelling evidence that structured memory training can transform professional performance, not only for intelligence analysts but also across industries where rapid, accurate recall under pressure is essential.

Research on Memory Techniques

One notable study in this space is Cody Herr's 2025 paper "Memory Techniques in the Intelligence Community: A Tool for Improving Analysis?"2 based on his research as a senior analyst at U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) of the Department of Defense (DoD) and a graduate of the National Intelligence University.

Herr’s work confronts a basic but often overlooked truth: Modern professionals are increasingly overwhelmed by information, but few are equipped with the cognitive tools to manage it efficiently. In the intelligence community (IC), analysts must synthesize complex, evolving data streams into coherent insights, often under intense time pressure. Herr’s experiment tested whether memory training could enhance analysts’ ability to recall critical details, improving the quality of their analysis and, by extension, decision-making at the highest levels.

The experimental design was straightforward but revealing. Thirty IC professionals were randomly assigned to either a memory training group or a control group. The memory training group learned techniques such as the memory palace method, the major system for numbers, and elaborative encoding, which turns abstract information into vivid, emotionally charged imagery. Participants were then asked to memorize sequences of actors and actions, tested immediately, and retested one week later.

The results were striking. Analysts who received memory training scored 45 percent higher on recall tasks than the control group and retained 57 percent more information after one week. Moreover, they were five times more likely to achieve perfect recall scores. Interestingly, factors such as years of experience in the IC and higher education levels had little impact on memory performance, but prior exposure to memory techniques did, suggesting that deliberate training makes a measurable difference.

This has profound implications beyond the intelligence world. Herr's findings suggest that memory optimization could (and should) be systematically applied across many professional domains where accurate, rapid recall is vital: law, medicine, crisis management, aviation, corporate strategy, and even education. Anywhere that professionals must absorb, retain, and synthesize complex information under pressure could benefit from structured memory training.

What’s especially powerful is that the memory techniques tested are ancient, low-tech, and cost-effective. The memory palace, for instance, dates back to ancient Greece, yet remains one of the most powerful methods known for long-term, reliable recall. It works by associating information with spatial locations along a mental journey, effectively "placing" facts along a familiar path like a house or a road. The major system converts numbers into memorable images based on sound patterns, enabling even long numerical strings to be recalled with ease. Elaborative encoding exploits our brain’s natural affinity for vivid, emotional content, helping dry facts to “stick” more easily.

In contrast to the current trend toward technological memory aids—apps, databases, artificial intelligence (AI) summarizers—Herr’s research points us back to the human mind’s native strengths. It suggests that with relatively small investments in training, we can significantly extend our own cognitive capabilities without relying entirely on external support.

Moreover, Herr’s work highlights the potential for memory training to boost not just recall, but higher-order cognition. Memory training frees mental bandwidth, allowing professionals to focus more effectively on critical and creative thinking. In the IC, this can mean the difference between spotting an emerging threat and missing a crucial connection. In corporate strategy, it could mean distinguishing between a transformative opportunity and a critical misstep.

It’s also worth noting that memory training appears particularly valuable for professionals over the age of 34, a demographic often reaching leadership positions, yet statistically prone to age-related memory decline. Instead of accepting cognitive erosion as inevitable, Herr’s study points toward actionable methods to maintain and even enhance performance into mid-career and beyond.

The relevance extends further still. In an era when information overload is a defining feature of nearly every professional landscape, improving human memory is not just a tactical upgrade; it’s a strategic necessity. Information is abundant; attention and cognitive clarity are scarce. Those who train their minds to organize, encode, and retrieve information efficiently will have a decisive advantage over those who do not.

Reimagining Professional Development

Herr’s study also implicitly challenges current approaches to professional development. Organizations routinely invest in leadership seminars, technical upskilling, and even stress management, but very rarely in cognitive optimization. This oversight is particularly glaring given that memory training is inexpensive and scalable, and can be integrated seamlessly into existing educational and professional development programs.

Imagine professional schools such as law, medicine, and business embedding memory techniques into their foundational curriculum. Imagine intelligence and security agencies systematically teaching memory palaces alongside analytic tradecraft. Imagine corporations offering memory training alongside project management certifications. The benefits would likely extend far beyond better recall to encompass faster learning, sharper pattern recognition, greater adaptability, and enhanced resilience under pressure.

Of course, more research is needed. Herr’s study, while very interesting within its niche, was small-scale, with a relatively narrow age range and artificial test materials. Future work could explore memory training across larger, more diverse populations; use more realistic and emotionally charged material; and assess impacts on complex judgment tasks, not just factual recall.

Nonetheless, the foundational message is clear: Memory training works, and it has been vastly underutilized in professional settings where it could make the greatest difference.

In the broader context of cognitive performance, Herr’s research adds to a growing recognition that mental fitness can be deliberately cultivated, much like physical fitness. Just as athletes train their bodies for peak performance, knowledge workers, analysts, strategists, and leaders can, and should, train their minds.

In the end, memory is not just about remembering more. It’s about thinking better.

In a world increasingly saturated with data but starved for meaning, that might just be the most critical skill of all.

References

1. Redish, A. D., & Mizumori, S. J. (2014). Memory and decision making. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 117, 1.

2. Herr, C. (2025). Memory Techniques in the Intelligence Community. Studies in Intelligence, 69 (1).

advertisement
More from Darren J. Edwards Ph.D.
More from Psychology Today