Gatekeeper training certainly can't hurt, and personally, I do believe that it works.
What Exactly Drives People To Commit Suicide?
Dreams have been described as dress rehearsals for real life, opportunities to gratify wishes, and a form of nocturnal therapy. A new theory aims to make sense of it all.
Verified by Psychology Today
This week, Suicide Prevention Week, I am posting each day about a "hot topic" in suicide prevention. Gatekeeper training is perhaps the hottest of the hot, at least in my opinion, as it is quite possibly the most popular intervention undertaken by those involved in suicide prevention.
Gatekeeper training involves educating natural helpers, or adults who interact with youth as part of their regular day, to recognize warning signs for suicide and know how to respond appropriately to suicidal youth. A gatekeeper should ultimately be able to provide a link, or open the gate, between a young person and a mental health professional.
The interesting thing about gatekeeper training as an intervention is that we have little evidence indicating that it works. By works, I mean a few things. Do gatekeeper training programs get adults who work with youth to ask the "suicide question?" Are we training the right adults? Do youth even go to adults to talk about their feelings?
Researchers Peter Wyman and Hendricks Brown, along with a team, have started to answer some these questions, while raising additional ones.
Many in schools and communities are training everyone they can possibly reach as gatekeepers. The results of the research done by Wyman, Brown, et al. indicates that it would be better to focus on training those who already have open, communicative relationships with youth. Those people might be teachers, mental health professionals, or coaches.
When the school district studied provided gatekeeper training to staff who were already asking youth about suicide, such as staff in helping profession roles within the schools, those staff continued to ask students about suicide. When the same training was provided to those who weren't already asking students about suicide, there was little effect on their behavior. In other words, those adults who do not ask students about suicide are not going to start asking because of a training. They may report knowing more about suicide risk and suicide prevention, but that knowledge is not translating into behavior change. For the helping professionals in the study, the barriers to open communication about suicide had already been broken down, facilitating student communication to these staff about suicidality.
Additionally, the study found that suicidal students' own attitudes and behaviors influenced whether school staff learned about students' suicidality. It's very much a chicken-or-egg type of situation. If students don't feel like the adults in their school or community will listen to them, they are not likely to come forward, no matter how many adults are trained to respond appropriately. If students don't come forward, trained gatekeepers don't have the opportunity to ask the question, no matter how well-intentioned they may be about using their training.
One program takes a unique approach to gatekeeper training, integrating it into a comprehensive approach to suicide prevention. "Sources of Strength," recently accepted into SPRC/AFSP's Best Practices Registry, has teens identify the trusted adults in their school or community. Then, those people are approached to be trained as gatekeepers.
One thing those of us working in suicide prevention can do is take into consideration the questions raised by Wyman and Brown's research when thinking about implementing a gatekeeper training program. These research findings reinforce the importance of taking a strategic and comprehensive approach to suicide prevention.
Copyright 2009 Elana Premack Sandler, All Rights Reserved
Gatekeeper training certainly can't hurt, and personally, I do believe that it works.
What Exactly Drives People To Commit Suicide?
In this day and time when resources at all levels are strapped, it is always a good idea to look at implementations of any kind that can bring about the most effective results. Sadly enough . . . the author has pointed out that this may be the case with gatekeeper training toward educators. Ideally it may have seemed to target the primary concern (saving young lives), however the results speak to possible ineffectiveness. The more comprehensive approach should combine the education and psychological counseling areas in the schools. Why are resources not allocated (and possibly federally mandated) requiring professional psychiatric care in the schools. Include on staff an LPC specializing in adolescent behavior. This individual could oversee all aspects of training and coordination between students and staff.
Thanks Socrates and Richard for your comments.
Socrates, you raised the point that gatekeeper training can't hurt. I agree that raising awareness about suicide risk among many people can't hurt, but I do believe that gatekeeper training is a specific method with specific intentions. If there are not accessible mental health resources in a school or community to which to make referrals, gatekeeper training can open a bit of a Pandora's Box of need - individuals at risk for suicide without appropriate mental health support.
Richard, I too have often wondered why mental health care is not more fully integrated into school services. I hope that ideas about what education really means are able to advance to include mental health and well-being.
Thanks again to both of you for contributing to this discussion.
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.