Skip to main content
Career

Seen, Heard, Promoted: Breaking the Double Bind

Workforce entry is rising for women, but leadership strides are still stagnant.

Key points

  • If women leaders fail to manage the double bind by displaying both competence and warmth, they face backlash.
  • Women tend be isolated and segregated based on their gender from networks both formally and informally.
  • Leadership, business, strategy, and financial acumen open doors to women's career advancement.

Diploma in hand and dreams in motion, a historical number of women graduates are stepping into the workforce this summer, ready to lead, innovate, and break barriers. Early career roles are where many are eager to showcase their talent. It’s a chance to prove themselves, showing they’re dedicated, flexible, and how well they fit with the company’s culture. But moving from the backgrounds in the “behind-the-scenes get-the-job-done roles” to more visible positions? That is a different kind of challenge.

Despite making up nearly 50% of entry-level positions, according to McKinsey & Company, after the first promotion, women’s presence drops by 10% and then continues to decrease with every leadership step, falling to just 29% female representation at the C-suite level. This isn’t about ability. It’s about visibility, and a deeper problem known as the double bind.

The Power (and Cost) of Visibility

Being visible at work isn’t about showing up. It’s about being seen for your ideas, heard in meetings, and recognized for your contributions. Visibility helps determine who gets the promotions, the project, the next big opportunity.

When women stay behind the scenes or aren’t invited to key conversations or relationships, their talent and potential can go unnoticed. This isn’t because they aren’t qualified, but because they haven’t been given the access to be visible in networks that matter. Four decades after the research on the topic, it has only become more exacerbated in male-prevalent industries, as women tend to be isolated and segregated from networks and leadership opportunities based on their gender. Limiting their access to high-powered resources. You know the inside info, the decision makers, and those who control the purse strings.

Now, visibility alone doesn’t guarantee recognition. Research shows that women are often taught and expected to be good team players, but not always how to promote their individual achievements or connect their work to business outcomes. As scholars note in the Journal of Applied Psychology and leadership consultant Susan L. Colantuono calls it, "The Missing 33%," strategic, financial, and business acumen need to be seen and heard. Without explicit performance metrics, women are perceived as less competent, less influential, and even less likely to have played a leadership role on the team. Speaking of leadership, these perceptions of women’s leadership capabilities are critical to their promotability.

The Double Bind Dilemma

The double bind is a pervasive issue, a lose-lose scenario that women have experienced far too often in the workplace. The relentless 30-year scholarship of social psychologist Alice Eagly reveals that society expects women to be the team player, displaying qualities such as nurture, helpfulness, and compassion, conveying warmth and support. In contrast, men are associated with being direct, aggressive, ambitious, conveying control and assertion, which have long been aligned with leadership stereotypes. As a result, society has difficulty separating leadership and gender stereotypes—resulting in women leaders being in a double bind.

Be decisive and assertive, and you’re called aggressive. Be warm and collaborative, and you’re seen as too soft to lead. It’s a trap for women built on outdated stereotypes where they are expected to be both strong and likeable, yet punished no matter which direction they lean. Vilified in performance reviews and leadership potential assessments, leading to a lack of promotability. These contradictory expectations don’t just shape how women are perceived, they shape what they’re allowed to become.

Strategies to Rise Above

Breaking the double bind and increasing visibility requires action by both individuals and organizations. Here are some strategies to advocate for yourself, and that leaders can also support:

  1. Tie Your Work to Impact. Don’t just do the job, connect your personal accomplishments to the objectives of the organization. Whether it’s increasing efficiency, driving revenue, or strengthening culture, frame your work in ways that demonstrate impact and show measurable value.
  2. Ask for Feedback, and Use It. Regularly soliciting feedback shows that you care about growing. Acting on feedback not only enhances performance, it builds credibility and shows you’re serious about your career path.
  3. Build Relationships Across Teams. Internal relationships extend beyond your manager and/or team. Intentionally build relationships across various departments because these cross-functional connections help amplify your work, build advocates, and get you noticed across the organization.
  4. Learn the Language of Business. Financial and strategic acumen isn’t just for leadership, it’s crucial for advancement. Understanding how your role impacts the bottom line helps others see you as a leader, not just as a contributor.

The Way Forward

Moving from invisible to visible at work isn’t just about raising your hand or staying late. It’s about making sure your contributions are known, and that you are supported, seen, and given the chance to lead. For women specifically, the path is oftentimes filled with invisible barriers that require navigating a labyrinth. But the responsibility doesn’t fall solely on women. Leaders, especially male allies, have a powerful role to play in recognizing the bias, amplifying women’s contributions, and ensuring that talent doesn’t go unseen.

Only when we break the double bind, through individual effort, active allyship, and organizational change, can we build a workforce where everyone has an opportunity to be seen, heard, and promoted.

References

Brass, D.K. (1985). Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 327–343.

Trzebiatowski, T., McCluney, C., & Hernandez, M. (2023). Managing the Double Bind: Women Directors’ Participation Tactics in the Gendered Boardroom. Organization Science, 34(2), 801-827.

Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3), 573–598.

Heilman, M. E., & Haynes, M. C. (2005). No Credit Where Credit Is Due: Attributional Rationalization of Women's Success in Male-Female Teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 905–916

Katz, M., Walker, N. A., & Hindman, L. (2018). Gendered Leadership Networks in the NCAA: Analyzing Affiliation Networks of Senior Woman
Administrators and Athletic Directors. Journal of Sport Management, 32, 135-149.

advertisement
More from Janelle E. Wells, Ph.D., and Doreen MacAulay, Ph.D.
More from Psychology Today