What My Therapist Knew Never Reached My Med Check

Source: Cottonbro Studio/Pexels

A key question this column seeks to ask is what psychiatry lost when we traded the talking cure for the prescription pad. I learned the answer as a patient. After a manic psychotic episode, I was committed to a state forensic psychiatric hospital, where my treatment narrowed to a single monthly encounter: a quarter-hour with a psychiatrist I came to call the Robot. The trouble was not only that the visit was brief. It was that it never went beneath the surface of me.

The meeting ran on a fixed circuit. A general question about my mood. Two safety questions, asked in the same flat cadence every time: thoughts of harming yourself, thoughts of harming others. Then the readings: my lithium level, my sleep, the tremor in my hands. The safety questions were the strangest part. A large meta-analysis found that most people who die by suicide had denied such thoughts when a clinician last asked; direct questioning predicts danger poorly. The Robot asked anyway, the way a technician reads a gauge, and did not seem to want the answer. It was a box to check, never a conversation.

Nothing I offered could turn the visit anywhere the instruments could not follow. I had spent months reading about bipolar disorder—memoirs, a thick textbook on manic-depressive illness—trying to grasp how my own mind had come apart. When I brought what I had learned, it slid off him. Months later I found his note from that meeting: he had "provided psychoeducation about bipolar disorder." In the record, the exchange ran one way, from expert to pupil. My understanding of my own illness was not a finding his method could record.

The prescribing fed on itself. When one drug produced a side effect, the answer was usually another drug. I watched long-term patients carry the freight of that logic: 10 or 15 medications at once, tremors, a restless shuffle, the weight gain and metabolic wear of years. It could adjust itself endlessly but never look up from its own numbers.

The Man Who Managed My Brain

Once I asked the Robot about the link between my bipolar disorder and the neurosyphilis I had years earlier, an infection that had reached my brain. He cut me off. "Regardless of how it appeared," he said, "what you have is brain damage. That's what matters." Much of the visit he spent typing; the screen took what attention was left. He was not entirely wrong. But in that one sentence a decade of memory, choice, shame, and effort was pressed flat into a fact about tissue.

The word psychiatry comes from the Greek for healing of the soul. Martin Buber distinguished two ways of standing before another person: the I-Thou, in which you meet him as a whole presence, and the I-It, in which you handle him as an object to be measured and filed. The Robot was fluent in the second, and the whole field has drifted his way. It is far easier to read a blood level and check a box than to sit in what the anthropologist T.M. Luhrmann called the "awkward intimacy" of human encounter. Biological psychiatry won its long war against the talking cure in part because measuring a person is quick and knowing one is not. But the soul answers only to the harder thing.

A profile in The New York Times once caught the shape of the loss: a psychiatrist who had traded 45-minute therapy hours for 15-minute medication visits, because that was what insurance would pay. "I'm very important to them," he said, "but I barely know them." The system had priced knowing them out of the job. None of this is against medicine. I take lithium to this day, and it did what years of the wrong treatment never had. It is against a psychiatry that keeps only the half of itself that can be measured.

Source: Felicity Tai/Pexels

What the Med Check Left Out

Here is the part that took me longest to see. I was not only getting the med check. Every week, in a different office, I met with a psychologist who practiced the older kind of psychiatry, the kind that explores rather than measures. She asked about my childhood, my shame, what had actually happened to me and who I had been before any of it. With her, I was not a set of levels. I was a person with an interior worth entering.

I assume they spoke; the treatment team met. But whatever she came to understand about me never surfaced when the Robot sat down for his monthly check. His 15 minutes proceeded as though her work did not exist, as though the only facts that mattered were the ones a blood draw could produce. He managed my chemistry; she tended the life that chemistry ran through; and nothing she learned was ever allowed to change what he did. She could have corrected the picture in a sentence. Her account of me was not part of the equation.

Psychiatry Essential Reads

Biological Psychiatry and the Allure of the Simple

Fifty Years of LSD Research: From Yale Labs to Clinical Trials

This is the quiet scandal of the 15-minute med check. Its problem is not only that it is brief. It is that nothing but the measurable is allowed to count: not my reading, not my history, not even the clinician down the hall who knew me best. A field named for the healing of the soul had filed the soul in another office and misplaced the key.

What finally returned me to health was slower and unbillable: the return of connection, purpose, and love, the things the Robot never asked about and no dose can supply. Those things mend a mind; none can be prescribed.

And psychiatry is preparing to move further in the wrong direction. Having swapped the awkward intimacy of human encounter for the efficiency of the measurable, the field now stands ready to hand even the 15 minutes to a chatbot that can adjust a dose and check a box without a person present at all. It will be faster and cheaper. And it will complete the retreat the Robot embodied—a psychiatry that can manage a mind to the last decimal and never has to endure the awkward intimacy of knowing whom it treats.