This Proves That Men Are Visual Creatures

Thank you Leanne. This whole "men are visual" idea is only an excuse to exploit the female body while we never get to see beautiful men.

I have discovered that I find more sights arousing than my husband or male friends. It's time we start encouraging and catering to female sexuality as we've done with male sexuality.

Watch out boys!

Anonymous wrote:

It's perfectly okay for men to be lunkheads. Men don't have to talk, men don't have to clean up after themselves. They don't have to be polite. They don't have to be conversationalists. They don't have to offer to help, they don't have to be neighborly. They are men.
Society has given the men a blanket excuse. Only women have to be polite and follow basic rules.

Oh please shut up.

Enough with the men have it good women have it bad crap.

The more you try to be a victim, the more stupid you sound.

Grow up.

I may have to disagree a little with you.
Of course women are visual, they are not blind. Also, all things being equal a physically attractive male would have greater appeal than an ugly one.
But things are never all equal.
For males sexual attraction is mostly about a woman's looks and attitude (it is different for long term relationships). We really do not care how much money you make, your educational level, your status, whether you are a leader or a follower, the brand of your clothes you wear, the car you drive, whether you are introverted or extroverted, whether you can follow all the nuances of our conversation, whether or not you get us, None of those things carries much, if any, weight in considering how attractive a woman is.
Looks matter more than most other factors.
Women are different in that regard. Many times you see women end up with the uglier man, even for short term hook ups, simple because he had something he more attractive man did not have. Sexual charisma does wanders for ugly males. I am not saying looks do not matter, but there other factors that can turn an average looking Joe into a Don Juan de Marco.
Looking good is nowhere near enough to be attractive.

If I'm gonna pick up a one nighter he's gonna be hot.

But I think women become aroused at a wider range of images.

If you insist that you are correct, well then that's your choice. I guess there are exceptions to every rule and I have seen many....it's the danger when you generalize and lump everyone into either black or white. There are some shades of gray in between. Not all women are like you described, many are though.....and although I know very few, not all men are only turned on by 'good' looks...again, there are exceptions to a rule.

So, perhaps we are both correct....you in saying the majority of men/women fall into these stereotypes...and I am correct in saying that there are those who don't, who are the exceptions.

And men haven't been allowed to objectify women? Ever heard of Playboy magazine? And men haven't judged women for not being good looking? Ever heard of a beauty pageant?

And women always get a pass? Ever heard a man call a woman a whore or a slut? Ever heard a man call a woman a gold-digger?

Many young women have eating disorders because they see so many suggestions in the media, and hear so many comments, that they try to reach an unrealistic body shape.

You claim women are more judgemental, yet at the very beginning of your comment, you judge women as "sloots". Your whole message is more judgmental and bitter than anything I've ever heard from a woman.

Mangina man, you've posted the same tiresome comments before. I guess you think calling a man by a female body part would insult a man? That works as an insult only for dumb men who think women are inferior. The rest just think it sounds childish.