Skip to main content
Relationships

How Can We Make Love Last?

Why good timing sparks romance, but time deepens love.

Key points

  • Timing can ignite romantic attraction, but time is essential for developing profound love.
  • What makes love exciting is not always what makes it enduring.
  • When timing becomes everything, people may become restless and continually search for alternatives.

"There is only one serious question. And that is: Who knows how to make love stay?" —Tom Robbins

Time plays a paradoxical role in romantic life. Every moment with a beloved can feel precious, yet romantic intensity often wanes as relationships endure. This apparent contradiction points to two important truths: time can deepen love even as it reduces some of its intensity. A crucial step in resolving this paradox is to distinguish between timing and time. Timing can be pivotal for romantic intensity; time is foundational for romantic profundity.

Timing Is Not Everything

"When my soul was in the lost-and-found, you came along to claim it." —Carole King

"I married for timing and convenience, I am afraid to say. My spouse will not admit it, but he did as well." —A married woman

We often hear that timing is everything in life and love. Yet the reality is more nuanced. Timing concerns the particular moment and circumstances in which something happens; time, by contrast, refers to duration, repetition, and development. Timing can be decisive in bringing people together and igniting attraction. Time becomes increasingly important in developing and sustaining enduring love.

Romantic timing may involve sheer luck. Two future lovers happen to meet on a train, at a party, or while traveling. The awareness that they could easily have missed each other can make their encounter seem extraordinarily fortunate. But timing may also involve skill: recognizing and responding to the right circumstances at the right moment. In both cases, timing concerns relatively brief periods. Sometimes, a single decision can alter the course of a relationship. Timing is particularly important in generating intense sexual experiences. This may help explain why quickies, makeup sex, and breakup sex can be remarkably passionate: sexual desire is highly sensitive to circumstances, novelty, emotional states, and timing.

Initial sexual timing is complicated. One view holds that sexual compatibility should be tested as early as possible; another suggests that some sexual restraint allows other dimensions of the relationship to develop first. Research has found associations between slower sexual progression and certain positive relationship outcomes, although these findings are more nuanced than the simple claim that "waiting is better." For example, Busby et al. (2010) found that the speed of entering a sexual relationship was negatively associated with marital quality among women, but not men, while Sassler et al. (2012) similarly found that sexual timing was related to relationship outcomes in complex ways.

The benefits of waiting often depend less on the passage of time itself than on what occurs during that period, such as the development of trust, intimacy, and mutual understanding. As one woman said, "I don't have a set time frame, but it's always before it gets super serious. I got to test drive the car before buying it." There is indeed evidence that resisting immediate temptation for larger later gratification predicts various advantages, including health-related ones (Yanaoka et al., 2022).

Sexual Passion
Sexual Passion
Source: pexels-15113435-6394845

These considerations can be understood in light of the crucial role of time in enduring romantic love. We can reasonably say, "I have a headache and am not in the mood for sex." It would sound strange to say, "I have a headache and am not in the mood to love you." Sexual desire is often temporary and situation-dependent. Profound love, by contrast, can endure through fatigue, disappointment, distraction, and even conflict. It exists not merely as a momentary feeling but also as a relatively stable disposition toward the beloved. Sexual desire may disappear for an evening; profound love need not disappear with it.

When timing becomes the supreme romantic concern, lovers may become restless. If romantic opportunities are viewed as dependent on luck and fleeting circumstances, people may continually worry that they are missing something better, or that an unexpected opportunity might threaten their current relationship. Constant searching can undermine the development of profound love, which is characterized by greater stability, trust, and emotional calm.

Romantic love is not a perpetual audition in which partners must continuously prove their worth or outperform potential rivals. Enduring love grows less from constant evaluation than from mutual acceptance and shared growth. No one can achieve the highest score all the time. We often become better partners when we are not constantly being tested and compared.

Yet modern romantic life makes timing unusually salient. Dating apps and social media expose us to a seemingly endless stream of alternatives, creating the impression that a better match may always be within reach. Under such conditions, immediate excitement can easily become the primary measure of romantic value. But excitement and profundity are not the same thing.

Time and Profound Love

"If I could save time in a bottle / The first thing that I'd like to do / Is to save every day till eternity passes away / Just to spend them with you." —Jim Croce

Profound love is not merely discovered; it is gradually constructed through time. Partners develop their relationship through shared activities, repeated interactions, emotional experiences, growing mutual understanding, and the gradual accumulation of memories.

Instant sexual intensity is easier to achieve than romantic profundity. Yet a life centered on pursuing fleeting moments can become exhausting and, ultimately, discouraging. People may repeatedly seek excitement while quietly longing for the calmness and security that enduring love provides.

Profound love also requires responsibility. Lovers face ongoing challenges that may at times seem overwhelming. Sustaining a loving relationship requires investments of time, energy, patience, and emotional resources. Yet these investments often generate something that the pursuit of constant excitement rarely provides: a growing sense of security. Paradoxically, however, this responsibility can foster calmness rather than anxiety. When people recognize that they share responsibility for the future of their relationship, they become less dependent on chance and fleeting opportunities. Their bond need not survive merely because the right moment happens to occur; they can actively contribute to its endurance.

Calmness can then become self-reinforcing. The more secure people feel about their relationship's future, the more willing they are to invest in it. Greater investment, in turn, can strengthen the relationship and make its future seem more secure. This helps explain why qualities such as gratitude, compassion, contentment, humility, kindness, and forgiveness are so important for profound love. These virtues may appear less exciting than passion and novelty, but they are often more important for sustaining a loving relationship. In an achievement-oriented culture that celebrates excitement, novelty, and immediate gratification, we can easily underestimate the quiet virtues that enable love to last.

Perhaps this is one of love's deepest paradoxes: what makes love exciting is not always what makes it durable.

Concluding Thoughts

"I'll love you twice as much tomorrow." —Leo Sayer

"Forever and a day, that's how long I'll be loving you." —Kelly Rowland

How can we make love stay? There is no simple answer. Romantic longevity depends upon personal characteristics, relationship dynamics, and changing circumstances. Still, distinguishing between timing and time provides an important clue.

Good timing can bring two people together. It can spark attraction, desire, and the exhilarating sense that something special has begun. But timing alone cannot sustain a loving relationship. That requires time: time to build trust, weather difficulties, create shared memories, and develop a deep understanding of one another. Both romantic intensity and romantic profundity matter. The mistake is to assume that the former can do the work of the latter. We cannot make love stay simply by recreating one exciting moment after another. If there is a secret to making love last, it may be this: stop searching for the perfect moment and start building a love that grows stronger across time.

This post is partly based on my book, The Arc of Love.

References

Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2019). The arc of love: How our romantic lives change over time. University of Chicago Press.

Busby, D. M., Carroll, J. S., & Willoughby, B. J. (2010). Compatibility or restraint? The effects of sexual timing on marriage relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 766–774.

Sassler, S., Addo, F. R., & Lichter, D. T. (2012). The tempo of sexual activity and later relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 708-725.

Yanaoka, K., et al. (2022). Cultures crossing: The power of habit in delaying gratification. Psychological Science, 33, 1172-1181.

advertisement
More from Aaron Ben-Zeév Ph.D.
More from Psychology Today