Workplace Dynamics
Workplace Well-Being After 6 Years of Collective Strain
Both employees and organizations are struggling, and there is no simple fix.
Posted June 18, 2026 Reviewed by Margaret Foley
Key points
- Well-being is not a workplace perk, it's critical need.
- Chronic stress changes how we work, so we should allow psychology into our business accumen more often.
- Over the last six years, workplaces have become an unexpected reflection of collective psychological strain.
- Research on allostatic load, chronic stress, burnout, and psychological safety isn't enough, but it's a start.
Lately, I have noticed a theme emerging across nearly every aspect of my research and clinical work.
I hear it in therapy sessions. I hear it in conversations with organizational leaders across the country. I hear it from patients participating in well-being initiatives at work in sessions. If I am honest, I hear it in my own internal dialogue some days as well.
People are tired.
Not necessarily the kind of tired that disappears after a long weekend or a good night's sleep. Instead, there seems to be a deeper fatigue—a weariness that comes from years of adaptation.
As a psychotherapist and researcher, I am increasingly struck by how many people struggle to find language for what they are experiencing. They often begin by talking about work. They describe difficulty concentrating, reduced motivation, shorter patience, or feeling emotionally depleted by the end of the day. But as the conversation unfolds, it becomes clear that work is rarely the whole story.
The past six years have exposed people to an extraordinary accumulation of stressors. A global pandemic, social division, economic uncertainty, geopolitical instability, financial pressures, technological disruption, and the relentless pace of information have created conditions that many nervous systems were never designed to navigate continuously.
From my clinical perspective, this matters.
Research on allostatic load suggests that repeated or chronic activation of the body's stress response systems can create cumulative physiological and psychological strain. Over time, this can affect cognition, emotional regulation, sleep, attention, decision-making, and interpersonal functioning. My nerdy research side is showing, so more simply, many of the capacities we rely upon most heavily at work are often the first to become compromised under prolonged stress.
Yet what I find most interesting is that many people do not describe themselves as stressed. They describe themselves as functioning.
They are meeting deadlines. Showing up for meetings. Caring for children, aging parents, partners, friends, and communities. They continue moving forward because life requires them to. And yet beneath that functioning is often a quiet question: "Why does everything feel harder than it used to?"
I do not believe this question can be answered solely through the lens of individual resilience.
For years, workplace well-being conversations have often focused on helping individuals manage stress more effectively. While those interventions can be valuable, they sometimes overlook an uncomfortable reality: We have been asking people to adapt to an extraordinary amount of uncertainty for a very long time.
At the same time, I have growing empathy for organizations, which I know some may question.
In many public discussions, organizations are portrayed as though they possess unlimited resources and unlimited influence over employee well-being. The reality I encounter is far more complicated.
Many leaders are struggling too.
They are navigating financial pressures, workforce shortages, changing employee expectations, rapid technological shifts, and their own personal challenges. In equity, people are still people, human. At conferences, I increasingly hear leaders express concern that no matter how much support they offer, it never feels sufficient.
Employees feel overwhelmed. Organizations feel overwhelmed. And somewhere in the middle sits the concept of workplace well-being.
This is where I believe we often get stuck. We search for a solution that will make the discomfort disappear. A new wellness platform. A resilience training program. A more flexible work policy. A return to the office. More remote work.
The problem is that none of these interventions address the underlying reality that many people are carrying a cumulative burden that extends far beyond their job description.
Psychological safety, meaningful connection, supportive leadership, manageable workloads, and opportunities for recovery remain critically important. The research supporting these factors is robust. Organizations should continue investing in environments that allow people to thrive rather than simply endure.
Yet we should be cautious about viewing workplace well-being as a problem to be solved. I believe it is better understood as an ongoing process of adaptation within an increasingly complex world. I find myself returning to this idea often, for myself. A human in this world. Not because it is particularly comforting, but because it feels honest.
As someone who studies well-being, supports others professionally, and wrestles with many of the same challenges personally, I have become less interested in perfect solutions and more interested in realistic expectations.
Human beings are remarkably resilient. The evidence for that is everywhere. But resilience is not infinite (Marvel movies showcase this often!)
The ability to keep going should not be mistaken for the absence of struggle.
Perhaps one of the most important shifts organizations can make is recognizing that well-being is not simply about helping people perform better. It is about understanding the conditions that allow human beings to recover, connect, find meaning, and sustain themselves over time.
The last six years have reminded us that we are not separate from the environments we inhabit. Our workplaces reflect our broader social realities, our collective anxieties, and our shared hopes for stability.
Maybe that is why workplace well-being feels so complicated right now.
We are not just talking about work. We are talking about people. People are complicated. I'm complicated. And people have been carrying a lot. Let's try to remember that; it's the first step toward true empathy. Now I'm going to call someone I care about and find common humanity, off a screen.
References
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311
McEwen, B. S. (1998). Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. The New England Journal of Medicine, 338(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199801153380307
McEwen, B. S., & Wingfield, J. C. (2003). The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Hormones and Behavior, 43(1), 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0018-506X(02)00024-7
Oakman, J., Kinsman, N., Stuckey, R., Graham, M., & Weale, V. (2020). A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: How do we optimize health? BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1825. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09875-z
World Health Organization. (2019). Burn-out an occupational phenomenon: International Classification of Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015). Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S72–S103. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1924
