Skip to main content
Gender

The Post-Forties Villain Era

Why growth in adulthood often gets women miscast.

Key points

  • Growth often means being cast as the villain by those who benefited from your self-abandonment.
  • Aging brings clarity: Some will call you selfish the moment you stop betraying yourself to keep their comfort.
  • Differentiation means staying true to yourself—even when it makes others uncomfortable.

Many women experience a curious phenomenon as they mature: The more we grow, the more we are mischaracterized. Behaviors that once earned approval—compliance, agreeableness, self-sacrifice—begin to feel like self-betrayal. And when we finally learn to advocate for ourselves, speak our needs, and withdraw from one-sided relationships, we find that others may not celebrate our newfound self-respect. Instead, they may call us difficult, selfish, or even toxic. Welcome to the "Villain Era"—a period of growth and individuation that can feel as punitive as it is empowering.

When People-Pleasing Becomes Self-Betrayal

In young adulthood, many of us learn to secure acceptance by shrinking. We become chameleons, shape-shifting into whatever version of ourselves best fits the expectations of the people around us. Whether in relationships, friendships, or professional environments, we often conflate connection with conformity. In doing so, we mistake peacekeeping for maturity and apologies for intimacy. We stifle our boundaries, contort our personalities, and internalize the belief that being liked is synonymous with being loved.

But people-pleasing is not a sustainable strategy for self-worth. Over time, the psychological toll mounts. The constant self-silencing, the habitual over-apologizing, and the prioritization of others' comfort over our own eventually leave us invisible in our own lives. When we are only known for our willingness to accommodate, we are rarely seen as full humans with needs of our own.

Individuation Disrupts the Status Quo

This dynamic becomes particularly painful when we begin to outgrow it. As women mature and develop greater self-awareness, we often recognize that many of our relationships were not rooted in mutual respect, but in asymmetrical emotional labor. In other words: we were the listener, the fixer, the receptacle for others' burdens—but rarely the recipient of the same care.

Breaking these patterns can be liberating, but it is rarely met with universal support. When a previously compliant woman starts asserting needs or withdrawing from one-sided dynamics, it disrupts the unspoken agreements that held those relationships in place. Some friends, partners, or family members may view this change as a betrayal rather than an evolution. They interpret boundaries as distance. They read self-respect as arrogance. And they may reframe the maturing woman as the villain in their story.

The Psychology of Relational Backlash

Psychologically, this backlash makes sense. Research on identity and social roles suggests that any significant change in relational behavior—especially if it undermines established power dynamics—can trigger defensiveness or hostility in others (Swann, 1987). People often prefer predictability over flexibility in their relationships. When someone changes their role, even for the better, it creates disequilibrium. If a chronic over-giver becomes assertive, those who benefited from their compliance may feel threatened, even if no harm was done.

This creates a difficult paradox: the very behaviors that signify psychological growth can invite interpersonal conflict. Healthy individuation is misread as selfishness. Assertiveness is labeled as aggression. In truth, the person entering their so-called Villain Era is simply practicing what psychologists call "differentiation of self"—the ability to maintain a strong sense of self while staying connected to others (Bowen, 1978).

Differentiation: The True Goal of Growth

Differentiation is not about detachment or narcissism. It's about resisting emotional fusion: the tendency to conflate others' feelings with our own or to prioritize harmony at the expense of authenticity. Developing differentiation allows us to tolerate disapproval without capitulating. It helps us stay present in conflict without abandoning ourselves.

But this growth often requires us to grieve. We grieve the relationships that could not withstand our boundaries. We grieve the version of ourselves that was beloved precisely because she betrayed herself to be palatable. And we grieve the illusion that being nice would keep us safe.

From Villain to Fully Human

The transition into this new era can feel lonely at first. But it can also be a crucible for true intimacy. As we stop apologizing for having needs, we begin to recognize who in our lives is willing to meet us as equals. We learn to have difficult conversations instead of giving performative apologies. We build relationships where mutuality, not martyrdom, is the norm.

In this context, being miscast as the villain is not a sign of moral failing. It is often a misinterpretation of boundary work by those who were never required to respect boundaries before. It is not selfish to reject roles that diminish you. It is not unkind to ask for reciprocity. And it is not toxic to walk away from dynamics that require you to abandon your dignity.

Freedom From Approval

As we age, we gain the clarity and courage to inhabit our full selves. We stop contorting to fit into roles that were never meant for us. We understand that we cannot be the hero in everyone's narrative—especially when their version of a hero is someone who remains perpetually small. The discomfort of being seen as a villain pales in comparison to the inner peace of finally becoming visible to ourselves.

Growth, in its most courageous form, is not always accompanied by applause. Sometimes it is met with protest. But that, too, is evidence of transformation. To grow up—truly grow up—is to defy the social scripts that keep us compliant and choose, instead, the authenticity that sets us free.

References

Bowen, M. (1978). Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. Jason Aronson.
Swann, W. B. Jr. (1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1038–1051.

advertisement
More from Amber Wardell Ph.D.
More from Psychology Today