Skip to main content
Sam Goldstein Ph.D.
Sam Goldstein Ph.D.
Illusory Truth Effect

Is It Real or Just the Movies?

Why telling truth from fiction isn’t optional anymore.

Key points

  • Fiction can distort our memory of facts.
  • Opinion often masquerades as objective information.
  • False beliefs persist even after being corrected.

We tend to think we know what's real. We watch the news, read books, hear stories, and feel informed. But too often, what we believe isn't grounded in fact. Instead, it's shaped by fiction, skewed by opinion, or filtered through someone else’s agenda. Our brains are wired to connect dots, even when they don’t exist, and we’re surprisingly poor at distinguishing between dramatized entertainment and objective reality.

Fictional Influence, Real Consequences

Take crime, for example. Television dramas and true-crime documentaries constantly bombard us with images of serial killers, elaborate heists, and endless shootouts. As a result, many people believe that crime is spiraling out of control. However, violent crime rates have declined significantly in many countries, including the U.S., over the past few decades (Gramlich, 2020). The disconnect between reality and perception can be traced back to how stories are told—and the power of repeated exposure. When a dramatic narrative is repeated often enough, it becomes a “truth” in viewers' minds.

This isn't just about TV. Fictional portrayals affect our understanding of everything from medical science to historical events. Researchers have found that even viewing a fictional scene containing false information can distort memory and knowledge. Butler, Zaromb, Lyle, and Roediger (2009) demonstrated that people who watched television shows with inaccuracies about history or science were more likely to recall those inaccuracies as facts. The brain doesn’t always tag memories with a warning label indicating they came from fiction. Instead, it stores them alongside real knowledge.

Hollywood plays a unique role in shaping cultural assumptions. Films often simplify or distort complex issues for dramatic effect. Legal trials conclude in just two hours. Genius breakthroughs occur overnight. Historical events are compressed, reshaped, or retold with dramatic license. While these stories entertain, they also create templates in our minds—templates that we sometimes use to judge real-life events. When someone testifies in court and doesn’t behave like a movie witness, we might mistakenly assume they’re lying. We question its accuracy if a medical diagnosis doesn’t have a dramatic “aha!” moment.

When Opinion Feels Like Truth

Social media introduces another layer. Platforms that reward engagement often promote emotionally charged content that feels personal and urgent, regardless of accuracy. Consequently, opinion and outrage can overshadow fact. When individuals scroll through headlines or videos without exploring further, they begin forming opinions based on feelings rather than evidence, and in this attention economy, being memorable is prioritized over being correct.

Opinion journalism has blurred the line between commentary and reporting. Many media outlets now feature content that mixes facts with interpretation, often crafted to align with a specific worldview. The result is that the public may be informed, but only in a selective manner. Information filtered through ideological lenses reinforces existing beliefs rather than challenging them (Kahne & Bowyer, 2017). This creates echo chambers where fiction, spin, or misinformation becomes difficult to distinguish from verified truth.

This fusion of fiction, opinion, and selective storytelling influences how people understand major issues. Consider climate change, vaccines, or the workings of governments. Misinformation isn’t just harmless confusion—it can lead to real-world consequences. When people believe falsehoods about medical treatments, they make riskier health decisions. They vote based on faulty assumptions when they misunderstand how the economy functions. As Nyhan and Reifler (2010) have shown, the initial myth can remain more influential even when people are presented with accurate corrections. Once a false belief sets in, it’s hard to dislodge.

What We Can Do About It

So, how do we fix this? First, we need to recognize how easily our perceptions can be manipulated. Understanding that entertainment, opinions, and social algorithms shape what we believe we know is the first step toward resisting them. It’s not about distrusting all media or becoming cynical. It’s about being a more active and critical consumer of information.

Second, we need to establish habits that distinguish fact from fiction. This involves verifying sources, taking time before sharing content, and being open to questioning even the narratives we wish to believe. It also requires engaging with information from diverse perspectives, particularly those that challenge our assumptions.

Ultimately, education must prioritize media literacy. Teaching individuals how to evaluate sources, understand bias, and verify facts is as vital today as teaching math or reading. If people cannot distinguish fact from fiction, it doesn’t matter how much information is available—they will remain susceptible to manipulation.

This problem becomes even more dangerous as it scales. A misinformed individual can make poor choices. A misinformed society can elect harmful leaders, ignore urgent crises, or tear itself apart over manufactured disputes. The distinction between truth and fiction isn't just a philosophical concern—it’s a practical one that influences policy, behavior, and public trust.

Why Telling the Truth Isn’t Optional Anymore

Each of us has a role to play. We don’t need to become experts in every subject, but we must take responsibility for what we believe, share, and learn. It’s not sufficient to shrug off misinformation as someone else’s problem or assume the truth will prevail. In a world where false narratives spread faster than facts, entertainment appears more convincing than evidence, and opinion is dressed up to resemble truth, being passive is no longer an option.

We must stop rewarding content that confirms our biases and start valuing curiosity over certainty. This involves asking difficult questions, being open to correction, and recognizing that being well-informed requires more than just exposure. It requires effort. It also means holding ourselves accountable before hitting “share,” understanding that every click, like, or repost is a small act that contributes to the larger information ecosystem.

Reality may not always be as dramatic or satisfying as fiction, but it’s the ground we stand on. When we lose sight of what is real, we risk losing the ability to solve real problems, protect real people, and make real progress. We owe it to ourselves—and to each other—to defend that ground.

References

Butler, A. C., Zaromb, F. M., Lyle, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Using popular films to enhance classroom learning: The good, the bad, and the interesting. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1161–1168.

Gramlich, J. (2020). What the data says (and doesn’t say) about crime in the United States. Pew Research Center.

Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2017). Educating for democracy in a partisan age: Confronting the challenges of motivated reasoning and misinformation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 3–34.

Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330.

advertisement
About the Author
Sam Goldstein Ph.D.

Sam Goldstein, Ph.D., is an adjunct faculty member at the University of Utah School of Medicine and co-author of Tenacity in Children.

More from Sam Goldstein Ph.D.
More from Psychology Today
More from Sam Goldstein Ph.D.
More from Psychology Today