Autism
Disrupting Imprints in Autism
Breaking the chains of imprinting in autism spectrum disorders.
Updated February 10, 2025 Reviewed by Abigail Fagan
Key points
- Ideological imprinting in ASD individuals can solidify extreme beliefs, making intervention difficult.
- Just as imprinting shapes attachment in animals, it can drive digital radicalization and social isolation.
- Early forensic and cognitive interventions can prevent extremist imprinting before it escalates.
The development of a mass shooter is not an impulsive act—it is a process shaped by cognitive wiring, environmental influences, and deeply ingrained belief systems. While discussions often misattribute mass violence to Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), a more forensic psychiatry perspective reveals a different phenomenon: extreme overvalued beliefs (EOBs), deeply embedded ideological convictions that dominate an individual’s identity and shape their worldview, sometimes culminating in violent action. Mass shooters like Seung-Hui Cho (Virginia Tech shooter who killed 32 people and wounded 17 others) and Adam Lanza (Sandy Hook elementary school shooter) did not kill because of ASD alone, but because their extreme overvalued belief systems, reinforced through digital radicalization, and "archetypal imprinting." This post explores how imprinting, a concept rooted in ethology and neurodevelopment, contributes to mass violence and why forensic psychiatry must move beyond misleading narratives linking autism directly to criminality.
The Power of Imprinting and Extreme Overvalued Beliefs (EOBs)
Autism is characterized by cognitive rigidity, heightened adherence to patterns, repetitive behaviors, and fixation on specific interests. While these traits are typically benign, they become concerning when an individual imprints upon extremist ideologies during critical developmental windows. Konrad Lorenz’s imprinting research demonstrated how early exposure to stimuli could create lifelong, irreversible behavioral patterns in animals. In experiments, goslings will attach to humans or even objects instead of their mother. In humans, imprinting extends beyond relationships to belief systems. When a child with ASD encounters an ideology during windows of "archetypal imprinting," it can become central to their rigidly held identity.
Recent research has highlighted strong links between ASD and eating disorders, particularly anorexia nervosa, due to overlapping cognitive features such as rigidity, attention to detail, and intense focus on specific ideals. A study published in CNS Spectrums emphasizes that individuals with ASD are at increased risk of developing maladaptive belief systems around body image and self-discipline, reinforcing the argument that extreme cognitive fixation in ASD can extend beyond eating behaviors to ideological commitments. Gender differences in imprinting emerge, with females often imprinting on archetypes of beauty, increasing vulnerability to anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphia, while males may imprint on ideological structures of grievance, vengeance, or militant justice, shaping belief systems that justify violence. Archetypes are often played out in children's roles as princesses, soldiers, outlaws or superheroes. Distorted archetypes can produce mass killers.
Case Studies: The Imprinting of Seung-Hui Cho and Adam Lanza
Seung-Hui Cho experienced years of social exclusion, which led to internalized grievance narratives. Over time, his self-perception as an outcast solidified into an extreme overvalued belief that he was destined to exact revenge on those who had rejected him. Digital subcultures reinforced this ideology, and no intervention could easily dislodge it. Cho took theatrical pictures of himself with his weapons, identifying as a Warrior archetype.
Adam Lanza was profoundly socially withdrawn, with rigid interests in past mass shootings. He studied mass violence as a formula, not an anomaly, demonstrating the intellectualization of mass murder. His fixated research and emotional detachment suggest not psychosis, but ideological imprinting, where violence became a defining aspect of his identity as a Hero archetype in his depraved shooter online subculture. Lanza also exhibited signs of severe eating disorder pathology, struggling with anorexia, which further reinforced his rigid cognitive style and overvalued preoccupations. His extreme weight loss, reportedly reaching a dangerously low body mass index, highlights how his fixation on control and discipline extended beyond shooter ideology.
The Role of Hormones in Reinforcing Ideological Imprints
Testosterone has been shown to increase cognitive rigidity and dominance-seeking behavior. In ASD males, this may further entrench militant ideologies, making radicalization more resistant to change. In girls, estrogen fluctuations may imprint overvalued beauty ideals. Research suggests that in adolescence, windows of vulnerability to imprinting due to hormonal flux may occur. The heightened brain plasticity may cause ideological framing to become deeply ingrained.
Digital Radicalization: A Reinforcement Mechanism for Extreme Beliefs
Unlike real-world interactions, which introduce cognitive dissonance, online communities serve as echo chambers where extremist narratives are validated and amplified. Pro-anorexia forums reinforce bodily control as a moral virtue, while militant subcultures provide ASD males with structured ideological frameworks, normalizing violence as logical and justified. By the time these beliefs take root, exposure to contradictory viewpoints is ineffective, as imprinting has powerful controlling properties.
Beyond OCD and Psychosis: The Unique Nature of Ideological Imprinting
Traditional psychiatry often misdiagnoses rigid extremist beliefs as obsessive-compulsive disorder or delusions. Unlike OCD, individuals with EOBs do not experience distress over their thoughts, rather they relish, amplify and defend them. Unlike delusions, these beliefs are logically structured and reinforced by social validation. Forensic experts must recognize ideological imprinting as a distinct phenomenon, not a symptom of ASD itself, but a process that exploits cognitive rigidity, thymotic drive (the human need for justice, honor, or recognition), through "archetypal imprinting" (e.g. Hero, Warrior, Soldier, Martyr, or Savior)—often modeled after previous shooter or copycat ideologies.
Prevention: Expanding Cognitive and Forensic Interventions
Given the persistence of ideological imprints, early intervention must incorporate a multi-faceted approach that integrates forensic risk assessment, primary interventions, and digital literacy training. One successful model is Eric Stice’s Body Project, which counter-imprints alternative narratives to disrupt harmful beauty ideals before they become entrenched. Applying this framework to violent ideological imprinting in ASD males, interventions should include forensic risk assessment tools, peer mentorship, structured critical thinking exercises, and targeted online interventions to provide alternative archetypal narratives.
References
Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Eating disorders and autism spectrum: Links and risks. CNS Spectrums. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cns-spectrums/article/abs/eatingdisorders-and-autism-spectrum-links-andrisks/088D9952821583117F8F53FA7FEF99C1
Konrad Lorenz. (1935). Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels: Die Artgenosse als auslösendes Moment sozialer Verhaltensweisen. Journal für Ornithologie, 83(3), 137-213.
Journal of Genetic Psychology. (2017). Cortisol dysregulation and threat perception in individuals with ASD. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 178(2), 67-89.
Stice, E. (2002). The Body Project: A cognitive dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program. American Psychological Association.
Isles, A. R., Davies, W., & Wilkinson, L. S. (2006). Genomic imprinting and the social brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361 (1476), 2229-2237.
Hoffman, H. S. (2014). Imprinting and the Critical Period for Social Attachments. Sensitive Periods in Development: interdisciplinary Perspectives. New York: Psychology Press.
Robledo, J. P., Cross, I., Boada-Bayona, L., & Demogeot, N. (2022). Back to basics: A re-evaluation of the relevance of imprinting in the genesis of Bowlby’s attachment theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1033746.
Luby, J., Allen, N., Estabrook, R., Pine, D. S., Rogers, C., Krogh-Jespersen, S., ... & Wakschlag, L. (2019). Mapping infant neurodevelopmental precursors of mental disorders: How synthetic cohorts & computational approaches can be used to enhance prediction of early childhood psychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 123, 103484.
Comparing stress and arousal systems in response to different social contexts in children with ASD; Blythe A Corbett, Rachael A Muscatello, Charles BaldingerBiological psychology 140, 119-130, 2019
Lemche, E. (2020). Research evidence from studies on filial imprinting, attachment, and early life stress: a new route for scientific integration. acta ethologica, 23(3), 127-133.
Allyn, G. (1974). Mammalian socialization and the problem of imprinting. Revue d'Écologie, (2), 209-271