A Warning Lesson From Lee Harvey Oswald’s Wedding Ring

On the morning of November 22, 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald stood in his wife Marina’s bedroom at Ruth Paine’s home in Irving, Texas. He asked for a kiss—one final sign of affection. It was an unusual request, as their marriage had been strained for months, marked by arguments and separations. Marina refused, her rejection hanging in the air. Without pressing further, Oswald quietly removed his wedding ring, placing it on the night table next to a small stack of cash. Then he turned and walked out of the room, leaving behind the woman he had loved, the family he had struggled to support, and the life he had finally chosen to abandon.

Hours later, at 12:30 p.m. in Dealey Plaza, three shots rang out from the Texas School Book Depository. President John F. Kennedy slumped forward in his open limousine as the crowd’s cheers turned into screams. A bullet had torn through his skull, ending his life and sending shockwaves across the globe.

For Oswald, the small, deliberate act of leaving his wedding ring that morning was a silent but powerful gesture. It reflected what threat assessment professionals today identify as a “last resort” warning behavior—a psychological point of no return. By asking for a final kiss and leaving his ring behind, Oswald severed ties with his personal life, resigning himself to the violent act he had planned. The moment was hauntingly symbolic, yet it would not be the last time such behaviors appeared in history. Decades later, school shooters Salvador Ramos and Adam Lanza would follow similar patterns of finality before carrying out suicidal and/or devastating attacks.

The Quiet Farewells Before the Loud Acts

Oswald’s request for a kiss and his abandonment of the ring were not just personal gestures—they marked his acceptance of the consequences of his actions. His detachment from his wife and children signaled a shift in his identity. Oswald, once a disillusioned man struggling to find purpose, now saw himself as a “warrior” for his own fractured ideals. This quiet farewell would echo through history as one of the most telling warning signs of violence.

Such gestures are not unique to Oswald. In modern tragedies like school shootings, the same behaviors—symbolic, final acts—appear time and again. Salvador Ramos, the gunman behind the 2022 attack at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, displayed similar last-resort behaviors in the hours before the shooting. In his final moments, Ramos methodically destroyed his belongings, smashing his phone and erasing his digital identity. He posted cryptic farewell messages online, hinting at what was to come, and acted with the detachment of someone who no longer saw a future beyond his violent plan.

Just a decade earlier, Adam Lanza, the shooter responsible for the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in 2012, had engaged in eerily similar behavior. In the days before the attack, Lanza destroyed his hard drive, erasing years of personal history, thoughts, and extreme overvalued beliefs. It was a deliberate act that mirrored Oswald’s symbolic abandonment of his ring. Lanza had also severed ties with his mother—the last person in his life—whom he would later kill before entering the school. Like Ramos and Oswald, Lanza embraced a distorted new identity, one that justified his violent plan as inevitable.

These behaviors—destroying possessions, abandoning relationships, and leaving final gestures—represent a crucial stage in the pathway to violence. Threat assessment experts call this the “last resort” phase, a point at which the individual fully commits to their plan, believing violence to be their only remaining option.

The Path to Violence

While acts of targeted violence often seem sudden or random, they rarely occur without warning. Experts in behavioral threat assessment have identified clear patterns that appear before attacks: Individuals often become fixated on grievances or violent ideologies, isolate themselves from family and friends, and spend time planning or preparing for their act. By the time they reach the “last resort” stage, their psychological shift is complete. They no longer see a way back, only forward.

Oswald, Ramos, and Lanza all demonstrate this tragic progression. For Oswald, the kiss he requested from Marina and the wedding ring he left behind symbolized a quiet yet profound finality. For Ramos, it was the destruction of his personal belongings and the unsettling goodbyes on social media. For Lanza, it was the deliberate erasure of his digital past and his violent severing of familial ties. Each gesture was an unmistakable sign of resignation, a moment when their inner struggles boiled over into violent action.

ASMR Essential Reads

What We Really Know About ASMR

The Psychology of ASMR

The Warnings We Miss

What makes these cases so haunting is that the warning signs were there, often in plain sight. Oswald’s behavior, though subtle, revealed his state of mind; Ramos' and Lanza’s actions painted an even clearer picture of their impending violence. Yet, time and again, these red flags go unnoticed or unaddressed.

The challenge lies in recognizing the significance of such behaviors and taking them seriously. A student who destroys their belongings or posts cryptic messages may not be acting out of mere frustration. A sudden withdrawal from relationships or an unusual goodbye may be more than just a phase. These actions, when viewed in context, are often the final step on a pathway to violence.

The Lessons We Must Learn

History has shown us that these behaviors are not isolated to one individual or one era. From Oswald to Ramos to Lanza, the “last resort” warning sign is a universal indicator of imminent violence. Understanding this pattern is critical for educators, families, and communities. Recognizing symbolic acts of farewell, destruction, or severance can provide a crucial opportunity for intervention.

For teachers, counselors, and parents, the lesson is clear: Small gestures can carry enormous weight. A student’s quiet detachment, a farewell message, or the destruction of personal possessions must not be ignored. These are not coincidences or random acts—they are cries for attention and warnings of danger.

Conclusion: The Silent Echo of a Wedding Ring

On the morning of November 22, 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald stood in front of his wife, asking for a kiss he knew he would not receive. By the time he left his wedding ring on the night table, the decision had already been made. Later, Salvador Ramos and Adam Lanza would leave their own quiet warnings—symbolic gestures of finality that signaled the violent acts they were about to commit.

The lessons from these stories are painful but clear: The signs are there. The quiet gestures, the small destructions, the subtle goodbyes—they are echoes of tragedy waiting to unfold. By learning to recognize and act on these signs, we have the power to stop violence before it begins.

The wedding ring, the broken hard drive, and the smashed belongings remind us of a single truth: The quietest actions often carry the loudest warnings.

Are we listening?