JUST A REMARK - VETERANS HAVE SOME CONTROL OVER THEIR LIVES AND
CHOOSE GOING TO WAR AS A JOB......DOGS DON'T!!!!!
USING ANIMALS IN WAR IS ONE OF THE MOST DISGUSTING THINGS ONE CAN
IMAGINE ...... IT'S ABUSE ..... CALLING A DOG A COMBAT DOG IS A
NONSENSIC MILITARY LABEL...... TO CELEBRATE THE POSSIBILITY OF
THEIR GOING BACK TO WAR.....? I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND.....
THE LEAST THEY DESERVE IS TO BE HEALED ...IF IT IS POSSIBLE AI
ALL TO WIPE OUT THE MEMORIES OF FEAR NOT LIVED OUT BEING
DISCIPLINED IN A WAY THAT FITS WAR CONDITIONS BUT NOT THE
PHYSICAL MENTAL OR EMOTIONAL NEEDS OF A LIVING CREATURE HUMAN OR
NON-HUMAN......
GREAT THEY CARE ! BUT LET'S NOT FORGET IT1S THE CARE OF THE
ABUSER .!!
RESCUE DOGS SUFFER EMOTIONALLY A LOT TOO BUT AT LEAST THEIR
COMPANION HUMANS ARE THEIR CLOSE FRIENDS.....AND IN THIS CASE IT
IS ABOUT GOING TO SAVE LIVES.... FOR A DOG IT COUNTS A LOT....
yES ITS AN IMMENSE THING WHEN SOMETHING AT LAST HAPPENS TO SERVE
THE INTEREST OF THE ANIMALS......
IT'S SO GOOD TO BELIEVE - OH YES THINGS ARE STARTING TO GO THE
RIGHT WAY....BUT THESE DOGS SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN TORZURED IN THE
FIRST PLACE.....
APPRECIATING ALL THE BEST INTENTIONS EXPRESSED IN THE ARTICLE IT
SEEMS THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BLIND US.....