Humor
We Joke, We Joke, But Why?
How harmless, prosocial pranks boost bonding, positive affect, and well-being.
Posted October 4, 2025 Reviewed by Tyler Woods
Key points
- Safe “benign violations” make pranks playful, not harmful.
- Shared laughter from pranks strengthens bonds and lowers stress.
- Planning gentle pranks fuels savoring and lifts the prankster’s mood.
- Rules: never punch down; keep it reversible, inclusive, and brief.
Here’s a case for the harmless, well-timed practical joke as a tiny intervention for social and emotional health—good for the target, good for the team, and (quietly) great for the joker.
Why jokes can be “prosocial mischief”
Humor researchers argue that something is funny when it’s both a “violation” and clearly benign—a safe breach of expectation (e.g., the stapler that’s been Jell-O-molded but unharmed, the Zoom background that turns your colleague’s office into a moon base). This benign-violation account helps distinguish playful pranks from hurtful ones and explains why the same gag lands in one relationship and flops in another (McGraw & Warren, 2010). Power and psychological distance matter, too: humor works best when there isn’t a power imbalance and when the “violation” feels safely distant from core identities or risks (Kant et al., 2019). In short, the ground rule for practical jokes is radical safety.
Measurable upsides for relationships
Laughter isn’t just pleasant; it’s bonding. In a study of romantic partners recalling their “how we met” story, shared laughter (not just total laughter) strongly indexed relationship quality and felt closeness (Kurtz & Algoe, 2015). In groups, laughter elevates pain thresholds—an indirect marker of endogenous opioid activity—suggesting a neurochemical pathway for social glue (Dunbar et al., 2012). A PET study later confirmed that social laughter triggers endogenous opioid release in brain regions tied to reward and bonding (Manninen et al., 2017). Harmless practical jokes—because they engineer a small surprise followed by shared amusement—can create precisely these co-laughter moments that tighten ties.
Benefits for the “victim"—and the joker
When the bit is safe and affiliative (vs. put-down or aggressive), it sits in the humor styles linked with better well-being and relationship satisfaction (Martin et al., 2003). Think of it as playful teasing that affirms membership (“you’re one of us”) rather than undermines status. For the plotter, there’s more than a giggle payoff:
- Anticipatory savoring. Designing a playful reveal builds a period of positive anticipation. Savoring—mentally up-regulating the enjoyment of future, present, or past positives—reliably boosts positive emotion (Klibert et al., 2022). The planning phase of a gentle prank is essentially a micro-savoring intervention for the joker.
- Prosocial intent. Positive activities aimed at others (e.g., acts of kindness) increase well-being, in part by strengthening social connection and a sense of efficacy (Lyubomirsky & Layous, 2013). While a prank isn’t a kindness per se, prosocial pranks—designed to delight, not embarrass—can operate via similar mechanisms: creating shared joy and social reciprocity.
- Stress physiology. Classic work shows mirthful laughter reduces cortisol, epinephrine, and other stress markers (Berk et al., 1989), and a recent meta-analysis finds spontaneous laughter is associated with larger cortisol reductions than typical activities (Kramer et al., 2023). If a light prank culminates in genuine laughter across the group, everyone’s HPA axis gets a little reprieve.
How to keep the “benign” in benign violation
- Know your audience and their non-negotiables. Avoid identities, vulnerabilities, and reputational risk. When in doubt, don’t. (McGraw & Warren, 2010; Kant et al., 2019).
- Punch sideways (or up), never down. Power asymmetries make jokes riskier and less likely to feel benign (Kant et al., 2019).
- Make restitution part of the gag. Anything moved, “kidnapped,” or rearranged is returned promptly; clean-up is on you.
- Engineer a quick reframe. The reveal should rapidly signal safety and inclusion (“We made you a fake award,” not “We put your performance on blast”).
- End with a shared celebration. A team muffin run or a silly certificate converts surprise into communal positive affect—exactly the conditions under which laughter bonds (Dunbar et al., 2012; Manninen et al., 2017).
Note: Practical jokes should never compromise dignity, safety, or inclusion. The evidence above supports affiliative, reversible, low-stakes play—not ridicule or “pranks” that create fear or damage.
A positive psychology take
In organizational and clinical contexts, micro-moments of positive emotion build resources over time—resilience, trust, and broadened cognition (see broaden-and-build; Fredrickson, 2001, cited in Proyer, 2013). Affiliation-focused humor and light playfulness are not trivial; they’re repeatable, low-dose practices that accumulate. Well-designed practical jokes, used sparingly and ethically, can serve as micro-interventions: they increase the rate of shared laughter (a relationship marker), generate savoring for planners (an emotion-regulation strategy), and can downshift stress physiology for the whole group. The bar is not whether a prank gets laughs; the bar is whether it deepens belonging without collateral damage.
If you’re working with teams: give them a simple checklist—Is it safe? Reversible? Inclusive? Brief? Followed by recognition?—and invite them to test a one-minute, zero-mess gag (e.g., faux “VIP Reserved” desk sign) followed by a treat and a real compliment. The science suggests those tiny “benign violations,” handled with care, can be surprisingly wholesome.
References
Berk, L. S., Tan, S. A., Fry, W. F., Napier, B. J., Lee, J. W., Hubbard, R. W., Lewis, J. E., & Eby, W. C. (1989). Neuroendocrine and stress hormone changes during mirthful laughter. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 298(6), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-198912000-00006
Dunbar, R. I. M., Baron, R., Frangou, A., Pearce, E., van Leeuwen, E. J. C., Stow, J., Partridge, G., MacDonald, I., Barra, V., & van Vugt, M. (2012). Social laughter is correlated with an elevated pain threshold. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1731), 1161–1167. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1373
Kant, L., Norman, E., & Clark, M. S. (2019). You must be joking! Benign violations, power asymmetry, and humor in social interaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(9), 1644–1660. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000545
Klibert, J. J., Sturz, B. R., LeLeux-LaBarge, K., Hatton, A., Smalley, K. B., & Warren, J. C. (2022). Savoring interventions increase positive emotions after a social-evaluative hassle. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 791040.
Kramer, C. K., et al. (2023). Laughter as medicine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cortisol levels and cardiovascular outcomes. PLOS ONE, 18(8), e0286260. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286260
Kurtz, L. E., & Algoe, S. B. (2015). Putting laughter in context: Shared laughter as behavioral indicator of relationship well-being. Personal Relationships, 22(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12095
Lyubomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How do simple positive activities increase well-being? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412469809
Manninen, S., Tuominen, L., Dunbar, R. I., Karjalainen, T., Hirvonen, J., Arponen, E., Hari, R., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Sams, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2017). Social laughter triggers endogenous opioid release in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(25), 6125–6131.
Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2
McGraw, A. P., & Warren, C. (2010). Benign violations: Making immoral behavior funny. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376073
Proyer, R. T. (2013). The well-being of playful adults: Adult playfulness, subjective well-being, physical well-being, and the pursuit of enjoyable activities. European Journal of Humour Research, 1(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2013.1.1.proyer


