Text messaging is something very common among youngsters and they are greatly addicted to it. I don't think it's ever going to be headache for them and they enjoy it a lot.
Office Furniture Riviera Beach
Dreams have been described as dress rehearsals for real life, opportunities to gratify wishes, and a form of nocturnal therapy. A new theory aims to make sense of it all.
Verified by Psychology Today
Lately, I've noticed more clients using text messages to discuss or argue about unresolved issues in their relationships. As someone who is all thumbs with my thumbs, I’m always amazed that people have the digital dexterity to carry on a reasonably coherent text dialogue for longer than two minutes. But personal challenges aside, texting is not the way to negotiate a relationship.
As texting becomes second nature to a generation reared on iPhones, it’s worth noting that human beings were designed to connect with each other on many different levels. UCLA professor Albert Mehrabian found that 58 percent of communication is through body language, 35 percent through vocal tone, pitch, and emphasis, and a mere 7 percent through the content of the message.
We all know that good communication is the cornerstone of relationships. So why attempt to resolve a disagreement using only 7 percent of your full expressive potential? Would you run a marathon with 7 percent of your physical strength or take an important test with 7 percent of your intelligence? Would you host a holiday gathering with only 7 percent of your house cleaned?
And that’s a generous 7 percent. Consider all the annoying slips of the finger that can interfere with clear communication. When the difference between “mad,” “sad,” “bad,” and “glad” is an errant thumb, wobbly finger gymnastics can be costly and confusing.
I understand that for some people, texting has become a habitual form of communications. And we all know that some habits are hard to break. But I also believe there are additional reasons why someone might initiate a delicate or difficult conversation via text. Here are a few theories:
Despite appearances, I am not anti-texting. Like any technology, texting has its place, especially to say a quick hello, banter simply, or make plans. But as I tell my clients, it's always preferable to discuss problems face to face. And when that's not possible, our smartphones also have digital keypads... and we have fingers.
Text messaging is something very common among youngsters and they are greatly addicted to it. I don't think it's ever going to be headache for them and they enjoy it a lot.
Office Furniture Riviera Beach
Amazing you should deign to speak to everyone. The one teen I discussed texts with told me she finds them loathsome and overly time consuming, compared to simply picking up the phone. Born 1998 told me this a few years back.
Smart people will be efficient and sheeple will be sheeple to crappy iphones.
can you please text me, I know your not a therapist but I just need someone to talk to please help me
Texting allows for silent communication, which makes it the perfect medium for carrying on a private conversation when others are within earshot. I appreciate being able to discuss sensitive matters without announcing them to everyone in my vicinity.
Yes but if the subject was really that sensitive why would you be discussing it via text messages in the first place? Couldn't you have 'silent' communication within the vicinity of your own home? I agree with the author that texting should be limited to a quick hello or simple banter. If more complex matters need discussing then they should be done vis-à-vis - if that isn't possible, a phone call could compensate. At least this would increase the level of communication (as now you have vocal tone, pitch and emphasis) and thus increase understanding (one would hope). I personally believe that one of the reasons why people prefer to text in difficult situations is that it allows them time to perfect their response, or 'come-back', which I guess is similar to having some 'control' over the conversation. However, I slightly disagree with the fourth theory, stating that texting 'expends less energy'. In some situations, I think it's actually easier to call the person up; I personally when organising a rendezvous, prefer to just call up the person I'm meeting - it's much less painful and far quicker than texting dates, times and locations etc. In addition, I think it's important to acknowledge that people who have been using mobile phones from an early age probably genuinely do find it easier to text, as opposed to 'real' confrontation where effects are much more immediate, and I think, require a greater deal of wit and emotional energy to sustain. But maybe I'm just being profoundly one-sided, me being the Luddite that I am...
Face-to face minimizes misunderstandings, and still so much needs to be queried: "Did you mean ..."; "is ... what you mean?" "I understand ..., is that what you mean?"
and also unlikely to change, as most people just want what is *easiest*, rather than what is best. If your relationship is already long distance, fine, but if you're using text messages to replace face to face, you're pretty much admitting that your relationship is already over.
I think this is why people insist on mandatory cheerful optimism, also. "Your emotions make me uncomfortable. Stop it and just be happy so I can be more comfortable around you. I don't really care what you feel, so long as I am comfortable."
That's an older problem than texting though, I remember the pre-cell phone age and even then the proper response to "How are you" was ONLY "Fine, and you?"
My daughter uses texting to avoid my questions she is 17.
Various studies attribute similar enough percentages of sources of "meaning" in communication, and my clinical and personal experience have led me to a strong rule of thumb.
It's quite challenging to follow, but if you do, you'll never know the trouble and pain you've avoided - and that's the point.
I've spent 30+ years living with and learning from a very good writer [full disclosure - my wife, Peggy Payne, is a NYTimes Notable Book of the Year author]. Most of us can't/don't exercise her clarity of writing. And still, readers naturally interpret her novels in very different ways. In my field we understand that one's personal experience and personality are deeply involved in how we interpret what we read.
So I tell myself and my clients Never to discuss important emotional issues by text, email or handwriting, because about 90% of the time the reader thinks they understand whats been written, but they actually understand only about 50% of the time. It can help to write out one's views about complex issues between people, but unless the conversation is up-time in person, with all the body language and analogical markings [auditory volume, intonation, pauses, intensity, etc], the back-and-forth misunderstandings multiply geometrically, often severely disrupting otherwise manageable relationships.
Let the sender and receiver be wary of written exchange about important personal differences. Dr Bob
Texting has it's place, although I really dislike conversations by text.
I have friends (one in particular) who, despite my repetitious going on that I don't like text conversations, insists on them! It usually causes misunderstanding and conflict and I'm often unjustly accused of being rude, etc.
How can I deal with that? Are there techniques I can employ to positively avoid these conversations without upsetting the other party?
Hi Tony, Yes there are 2 strong ways to deal with this, although I'd not suggest them to you unless you're willing to let go of this friend. My view is that when someone won't respect your strongly expressed distaste for text conversations, it's a boundary violation, likely because that friend doesn't and likely won't understand a view so different from his own.
As long as you answer his text messages, you're rewarding his sending them. Unless you're willing to be firm in defending your boundary, nothing is likely to change. I too hate text messages, and 'tho I may sometime want to have been able to send one or received one, my personal solution is absolute.
I had my carrier fix my phone so it won't send or receive texts, and I've not regretted it in the many years since I applied this final solution.
I do have to tell friends and clients about how my phone functions, and that's been OK with everyone. I recognize that younger folks do lots more texting than does my age group, so you may have to have the courage of your convictions and be willing to be different than most of your friends on order
to resolve this issue. Dr Bob
Maybe you and I should swap friends! I'm demonstrably and quantifiably better at texting but so many keep trying to call!
If a deaf person communicates orally in person but can only text otherwise, are his texts subject to being used to incriminate himself in court, or even to be reviewed in a court case?
It's been my experience the people who insist on calling end up being the most egregious boundary violators (e.g. calling while I'm in the bathroom and throwing a tantrum that I didn't answer right away, while a texter is just like hey it's been a few days great to hear from you).
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.