Criminal globalists and their lying media created a worldwide panic and destroyed every economy over 300k corona victims, most of them already ailing or elderly.
300K on a planet of 7 billion.
This is absolute madness.
Dreams have been described as dress rehearsals for real life, opportunities to gratify wishes, and a form of nocturnal therapy. A new theory aims to make sense of it all.
Verified by Psychology Today
Coronavirus is permeating every aspect of our lives, including our sex lives.
One area where this has quickly become evident is in the world of porn. The coronavirus pandemic is affecting not just the amount and type of porn being produced, but also how much porn people are consuming and what they're searching for on major sites.
First, porn consumption rates are up in general. For example, as reported by Pornhub, traffic has steadily increased in March as the pandemic has spread and lockdowns have been instituted in major cities and countries around the world. In fact, on March 17 alone (the most recent date for which data is available) traffic to the site was up 11.6 percent.
Porn searches are up, in part, because a lot of people are at home with more time on their hands than usual. However, they may also be up because some people are using sex as a coping mechanism for dealing with their fear of disease and death.
As I describe in The Psychology of Human Sexuality, the key idea behind Terror Management Theory is that “when we are reminded of our own mortality, we subconsciously alter our attitudes and behaviors to help us cope with the ‘terrifying’ prospect of our eventual death.”
Some research has found that when we are faced with the prospect of our own mortality, this prompts sexual desire and behavior as a coping mechanism. To the extent that the COVID-19 pandemic is making mortality more salient, it would make sense that you'd see a rise in horniness right now, which could partly explain why more porn is being consumed.
However, people aren't just watching more porn right now—they're also watching more coronavirus-themed porn. In the last 30 days, more than 9 million coronavirus searches have appeared on Pornhub. There are also now more than 1,000 videos that pop up on the site when you search for "coronavirus."
What does coronavirus porn look like? It involves a lot of people having sex while wearing masks, surgical gloves, and hazmat suits.
Why are people looking for this kind of porn? The answer is similar to why people also tend to look for holiday porn throughout the year: It reflects our constant need for sexual novelty and humans’ ability to fetishize virtually everything.
This is part of the reason we often see current social events reflected in our porn searches. For example, around major holidays like Valentine’s Day, Halloween, and Christmas, porn searches become more festive—people start looking for porn with holiday flair.
However, what we’re seeing right now might also be an eroticization of fear. It has been well established that strong emotions are often mistaken for sexual attraction. For example, when people engage in activities that produce high-arousal states—like riding a roller coaster—and then encounter an attractive stranger, attraction to that person increases. High-fear states have the potential to amplify sexual arousal and attraction.
If people are on edge from coronavirus news (meaning they’re in a heightened state of generalized physiological arousal) and, say, see a media image of an attractive person wearing a mask, this could lay the foundation for them to start sexualizing coronavirus imagery.
The rise of coronavirus porn and increased traffic to tube sites isn’t the only way the porn industry is being impacted right now. As recently reported in Rolling Stone, many porn performers are worried about how their work could potentially expose them to the virus. Just being in close contact with someone else (being less than 6 feet apart) poses a potential transmission risk, so it stands to reason that porn performers would be at substantially elevated risk due to the very intimate nature of their job.
Some porn performers are therefore avoiding shoots until the situation is under control to protect their health, despite the personal financial hit it will cause. Others are compensating by doing more solo cam work to minimize physical contact with others while still protecting their bottom line.
Of course, all of this is also going to have implications for porn production companies: If performers sit on the sidelines until the crisis is under control (and we obviously have no idea when that will occur), the potential financial implications for the companies are enormous.
What we’re seeing right now is that the COVID-19 coronavirus is affecting not just the amount of porn that’s being produced, but also the type of porn that’s coming out (i.e., more coronavirus-themed porn and more solo work), what people are searching for on tube sites, and how much porn is being consumed overall.
Facebook image: Syda Productions/Shutterstock
References
Lehmiller, J. J. (2017). The Psychology of Human Sexuality (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Goldenberg, J.L., McCoy, S.K., Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (2000). The body as a source of self-esteem: The effect of mortality salience on identification with one’s body, interest in sex, and appearance monitoring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 118–130.
Criminal globalists and their lying media created a worldwide panic and destroyed every economy over 300k corona victims, most of them already ailing or elderly.
300K on a planet of 7 billion.
This is absolute madness.
I'm afraid the issue here is your failure to grasp exponential math. If it limits itself to just 300k it wouldn't be a problem. What you're not understanding is that this is growing faster and faster, adding another digit every 2-3 weeks worldwide. The failure here is in your grasp of the basic fact that it's not stopping at 300k, but doubling about every week worldwide. If you double something every week for 10 weeks in a row, it's 1,000 times more. So, that means in just 10 weeks we could have 500 million. And with a mortality rate of roughly 1%, we're talking about 5 million dead.
Hospitalization rates are much higher than fatalities, as high as 50% among older people, yet still 20% among people ages 20-44. In ten weeks, you are talking about maybe 100 million hospitalizations around the globe. Which is a problem because there aren't that many hospital beds in the whole world.
So, with 20% of people ages 20-44 ending up in hospitals witth covid-19, and half of deaths below age 75, I don't think you could say this is hitting only the old a frail.
Hence, the need to try to stop this horrendous growth, and China has shown that it can be done, but you have to do serious social distancing for a while.
So, it's not shutting down economies because of just 300k, it's shutting them down to prevent the 300k from becoming 300 million and more.
What part of that are you having difficulty understanding?
I think we're about scraping the bottom of the barrel here for articles remotely related to the virus. This site has become the National Enquirer of psych.
I disagree. Covid-19 is on everyone's mind. How could it not be, with shelter-in-place orders for many, and how to cope.
So exactly what is your complaint? You think this is just all fake hysteria? Be specific, with numbers and facts.
So interesting about the prospect of our mortality increasing sexual desire. I'd imagine this has something to do with reproductive instincts. When death is near, we feel an urgent need to pass on our genes.
Anonymous wrote:So interesting about the prospect of our mortality increasing sexual desire. I'd imagine this has something to do with reproductive instincts. When death is near, we feel an urgent need to pass on our genes.
Flogging the dong is not quite passing on one's genes except into a paper towel.
Well, actually, in a way it is. Just kind of missing the target a bit. And that fuzziness about the focus extends to many acts of sex, many of which can't result in pregnancy. Your point would otherwise seem to be that no normal man with a well-tuned sex drive would want to do anything but have intercourse with a woman in her fertile years. LOL
Not only is Pennsylvania's governor getting advice on what to shut down from a man who wears a dress and calls himself Rachel, we have a society that instead of bowing their knees in prayer and pleas for mercy, rather log on and watch others on their knees. This is not going to end well.
Just because there are more people viewing porn, doesn't mean they're necessarily more horny. In many cases, people confined to their homes for several weeks become bored, and are looking for some kind of escape. At a pandemic like this, viewing porn can be a result of boredom, not necessarily arousal. What the author failed to mention is that sites like Pornhub are offering more incentives than ever (don't ask me how I know), in having people click on their site. Perhaps it's actually because they AREN'T doing as well as they usually do. Porn scenarios depicting groups of people very close together can actually turn actentuate peoples' fear of the pandemic (subconsciously) and turn them off. People may also result to different kinds of porn, or fetishes. Anything that would involve more "protection" from catching the virus. I don't believe that Lehmiller did sufficient research on this topic. It's easy for any layman to say, "Oh, of course people will be turned on if they think they're more likely to die sooner." Again, I disagree with his hypothesis. I believe that people could be turned off by the thought that this coronavirus could potentially kill them, and the last thing they'll be thinking about is sex. If anything, they'll be thinking about the actions that made within the last 24 hours, and if they accidently got to close to someone. People will have the virus on their minds... not sex.
This article kind of is a victim of the "Why Psychology will never understand sexuality".
Porn is going through a bad phase right now. Not so sure about why but if you track major websites it producing less content, and small time pay per clip type sites are doing increasingly well. There is also a massive uptick in 'woke' porn. Lots of White women, black men, which have traditionally been unpopular. Is this 'guilt porn", typical in White urban culture? This article got the "novelty" question wrong. Most sexuality is typically driven by male interest. Most men know very early what turns them on - heels, body parts, specific types of acts, and these never go away once imprinted. So its not novelty, its variations of interest themes, which is largely infinite. Many porn themes are based on fashion - whether its lingerie, clothing types, shoes, makeup etc. Fashion does is not dictated by male sexual interests, but by Gay fashion gurus telling women what is popular. And every 10 years or so fashion goes to garbage. What men find sexy, doesnt really change, but fashion has to change to keep women buying. Fashion in the past two years is UGLY and unsexy. So most mainstream porn shows far more barefoot, totally naked content. People havent lost interest in porn, as evidenced by Porn hub searches, but they arent paying for crap. They prefer to spend their $ at the pay per clip outlets despite that being much more expensive and lower quality. We will see these trends reverse as they happen every 10 years or so.
Get the help you need from a therapist near you–a FREE service from Psychology Today.