Skip to main content

Verified by Psychology Today

Workplace Dynamics

Bridging the Research-Practice Gap for Healthier Workplaces

Insights from the HRD Wellbeing Summit Canada.

Key points

  • Researchers and practitioners have shared priorities such as women's issues and psychological safety.
  • Big data facilitates convergence between research and practice.
  • Neurodiversity and financial wellness demand attention in employee well-being research.
Luis Quintero/Pexels
Source: Luis Quintero/Pexels

As an occupational health and safety professional deeply entrenched in academia, I often find myself immersed in research papers and academic conferences, delving into topics ranging from psychological safety to workplace pain and mental health issues. However, despite this dedication to understanding the intricacies of healthy workplaces, there's always been a noticeable gap between the theoretical discussions in academia and the practical realities faced by workers in the field.

Determined to bridge this divide, I recently attended the HRD Wellbeing Summit Canada in Toronto, a gathering specifically tailored for HR professionals focusing on employee wellness. My objective was simple: to listen to the voices of those working on the front lines and gain insights into their daily challenges and perspectives on the issues I study.

What emerged from this experience was a striking alignment between the topics dominating academic discourse and those at the forefront of practitioners' concerns. Themes such as psychological safety, mental health, diversity, equity, and inclusion resonated strongly in both realms, reaffirming that our research efforts are indeed addressing pressing real-world issues.

However, beyond the shared topics of interest, I observed a divergence in the nature of questions asked by researchers and practitioners: While researchers tend to focus on the "what" and "why" of workplace dynamics, practitioners are more concerned with the "how"—seeking practical strategies for implementing changes that foster psychological safety and employee well-being. They are already sold on the importance and relevance of work well-being.

An intriguing development I noted was the increasing convergence between organizational practices and research methodologies, spurred in part by the rise of big data. While researchers emphasize the importance of empirical research, practitioners are increasingly leveraging their own anecdotal experiences alongside emerging data-driven insights to inform decision-making within organizations. This shift toward data-driven decision-making holds promise for narrowing the science-practice gap and enhancing the effectiveness of organizational interventions.

One particularly illuminating session at the summit centered on neurodiversity, shedding light on the untapped potential of employees with diverse neurological backgrounds. The session sparked a palpable interest among delegates, highlighting the need for greater understanding and inclusion of neurodiverse individuals in the workplace—a sentiment echoed by many in attendance.

Moreover, there was a growing acknowledgment of the significance of financial wellness within the broader spectrum of employee well-being—a trend that I believe warrants further exploration and integration into future research endeavors. By incorporating the financial aspect of employee health into our studies, we can better address the holistic needs of workers and contribute to more comprehensive wellness initiatives within organizations.

My experience at the HRD Wellbeing Summit Canada served as a powerful reminder of the importance of bridging the gap between research and practice in the field of occupational health and safety. By actively engaging with practitioners, listening to their insights, and aligning our research efforts with real-world challenges, we can foster healthier, more supportive workplaces for all.

More from Duygu Biricik Gulseren Ph.D.
More from Psychology Today