Great post! Based on everything I've read as people confront their own mortality, they become more intolerant of people who do not agree with them morally. Considering the current political environment, the challenges we face because of the pandemic, and how at some point we will begin working together and interacting with each other in public, I think this topic needs to be at the forefront of awareness, especially within organizations.

Controversy over our response to Covid-19 has intensified as states have begun loosening the social distancing restrictions. In this context, the wearing of face masks has become one of the most contentious issues. For example, there was outrage at Vice President Mike Pence for choosing not to wear a mask when he visited hospital staff and a patient at Mayo Clinic. (He later said he made the wrong decision.)
Anger has also filled online bulletin boards here in the suburbs of Philadelphia, with people posting rage-filled comments about neighbors not wearing masks in public. Grocery store employees have been verbally assaulted for asking shoppers to wear masks, a man at a Dollar Tree store wiped his face on an employee’s shirt when she asked him to wear a mask, and there has been at least one mask-related murder. (Full disclosure: I wear a mask anytime I enter a public space.)
What is it about a seemingly neutral piece of protective gear that can be so inflammatory? Like many points of controversy, it’s not the thing itself but what it represents. Remember the reaction to President Obama’s comment about arugula? People weren’t upset because they prefer iceberg lettuce to arugula, but because they saw it as a symbol of his aloofness and elitism.
Visible Markers of a Political Divide
In a similar way, face masks are tied to the political conflict over our response to the coronavirus. Those who lean left politically tend to see the virus as a more dire threat; those on the right are more likely to downplay its seriousness or compare it to less deadly strains like the flu, often following the lead of conservative politicians.
Accordingly, masks may be seen as a marker of political loyalty, triggering feelings of us-versus-them. A politically liberal person may assume that someone wearing a mask is “on their team,” while those who don’t wear masks must be Fox News-watching Republicans. The anger they feel is not simply about the mask, but about believing the non-mask wearer is a certain type of person.
On the flip side, the politically conservative might interpret calls for masks as politically-driven efforts to play up the seriousness of the coronavirus. Being asked to don a mask then becomes not just a request to protect the health of others, but to give up their worldview and political allegiance. It may feel like asking a Red Sox fan to put on a Yankees jersey.
Conflict Over Health vs. the Economy
Masks are also linked to the broader debate about the disease threat from the coronavirus versus and the devastating impact that social distancing has had on our economy. This controversy again has fallen out on political lines, with the right placing a relatively greater emphasis than the left on the need to restart the economy.
Within this debate, some may see masks as playing up the disease side of this balancing act, while those who don't wear masks (like many agitating for reopening the economy) might be seen as prioritizing a swift return to normalcy over concerns about health and safety.
Pandemic Fear
Finally, fear has spread around the globe along with the virus. The rising number of cases and deaths has put people on edge as they worry about their own health and that of their loved ones. Those who work in healthcare or whose family members do may feel the fear more acutely. The elderly and other groups at greater risk for a poor outcome with the virus also tend to be more concerned about it.
At the same time, COVID-19 has had alarming effects on the economy. Millions of people are out of work, and many businesses are likely to fail. Countless people are worried about their ability to survive: How will they afford food and pay their rent or mortgage, not to mention their healthcare?
In light of these anxieties, masks may trigger our fear that someone is trying to block our pursuit of happiness—either by not wearing a mask and threatening our life, or by making us wear masks and taking away our liberty. (Some people also don’t like masks because they panic when wearing one, due to claustrophobia or feeling like it’s hard to breathe; others find masks intolerable because of conditions like autism spectrum disorder and sensory processing issues.)
Assume Less
Conflict over masks is likely to continue as the debate over how and when to reopen the country intensifies. If possible, try to assume as little as possible about others based on whether or not they’re wearing a mask.
The grocery clerk who asks you to put one on might actually be a right-wing Republican, who is simply enforcing the store’s policy or is concerned about others’ health. The maskless runner who exposes others to their “breath cloud” might be a Democrat who just can’t stand the feeling of running with a mask. We might be irritated by others’ choices, but the intensity of our reactions may be more measured if we’re not making faulty assumptions about them.
This is not to say that wearing a mask in public is simply a matter of personal choice. Masks aren’t like seatbelts: They protect others more than they protect you, and the CDC recommends wearing them in public spaces when you can’t appropriately social distance.
If you’re reluctant to wear a mask when required, question any automatic thoughts about others trying to take away your freedom. Most likely their goal is just to keep everyone safe, not to make you buy into a certain worldview or to force you to eat arugula.
Everyone has had to make sacrifices during national emergencies, like military service during times of war. Our forebears gave up their freedom to eat chocolate during World War II so that more of it could go to the soldiers. Wearing a mask could be seen as a patriotic expression of self-sacrifice, as you do your part to defend our country from a microscopic invader. Wear it with pride as you hold onto your liberties.
Facebook image: Liza Kras/Shutterstock
Re: Morality and Politics
Thank you, James! I appreciate your cogent remarks....
Wearing a mask is really not a moral or political choice
I am a 70 year old man living in Seattle. Research has shown that while outside, the chances of being infected are very slim. Thus, I understand not wearing a mask while outside. However, I live in a high rise and must use an elevator several times a day. When someone strolls into the elevator not wearing a mask, that person is threatening my life. Do we really have to debate if that is a political or moral choice? It is a choice based on ego or narcissism. It isn’t about the person wearing the mask. It’s about being empathetic about others you might harm.
We live in a world where empathy often disappears as we communicate through a machine. However, threatening someone’s life is not a sociological point of reference. I take it as personally as someone brandishing a weapon, intending to do me harm, who has no emotional ability to have concern for my safety. I wear a mask that expresses this statement, “Where’s yours jerk.” I don the mask with pride, not shying away from the ageism inherent in the actions of people who do not wear masks in interior spaces.
Re: Wearing a mask
Excellent points, Philip. It's unfortunate that masks got wrapped up in politics. You bring up a good point about the more vulnerable position of older individuals, and our responsibility to do what we can to keep everyone safe. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and your experience.
Non mask wearers are not threatening anyone's life
The controversy over the efficacy of wearing masks is one thing, but the accusation that people are threatening your life is absurd. They do not filter all microbes, and could do more than good, especially if contaminated. They do not replace hand washing or social distancing. To show the level of hyperbole around this - if a person got into an elevator waving a hand gun and you felt your life was threatened, wouldn't you get off the elevator or call for help? But you don't. Why? Because the person is not a threat to you. The vast majority of people who died of covid were being cared for by people wearing masks. Masks may be an additional layer of protection when caring for those who are immunocompromised. But they are neither the cause nor the cure when it comes to infection. The other aspect of this issue is that there are no long term studies on the psychosocial effects, or the effects of breathing through a mask for long periods. And finally, the use of mass produced masks with synthetic fibres for the entire global population, creates a staggering amount of waste, every single day. These cannot be recycled, since they are bio-hazardous waste, which means they are polluting the earth at an exponential rate. As far as the politics are concerned - it is polarizing extremism, and media fear mongering that has caused people to actually believe that those who do not wear masks are out to kill them. This is very dangerous thinking indeed!
Non mask wearers are not threatening anyone's life
Thank you Valerie. When taking into account the way germs amd bacteria spread and how it biologically and scientifically works one knows that wearing a fabric mask cannot protect you. Weather you are the sick one (who are already struggling to breath and should NOT be wearing things further complicating your breathing) or the person who isn't sick, who doesn't realise that molecules travel through, passed, over, under and in the sides of your mask wherever air can reach. Molecules of some substances can even penetrate steel. There are substances strong enough to do this even. The media endangers lives. They don't explain how microorganisms function. Or that you kill good bacteria (oh yes! Good bacteria! Probiotics) found on your skin and inside your body that actually fight against the bad ones. No doctors have come forward dicrediting the absurdity of washing your hands 50 times a day. Or obstructing your breathing for hours a day. Or having the psychological aspects talked about by psychiatrists like what happens when a stranger rushes towards you with something he shoots at you, or shoves in your face. Especially if you have PTSD. Where are the so-called exper
experts and professionals? Why doesn't anyone explain or stand up for what is true? Or for those with other medical conditions? Suddenly face mask and hand sanitizer manufacturing is every company's speciality. My husband has severe rash on his arm, since the expert company's hand sanitizing spray was so rushedly and carelessly (as always) sprayd 3 times rappidly on both his hands while some of it was sprayd onto his open skin, and since he washed his hands when he got home but didn't think to need to wash his entire body only after a trip to buy a bread his arm was covered in a rash by nightfall since the chemical was still on his skin. I am an Autistic CPTSD sufferer who is now forced to stay in my house like a prisoner. Even though the law states that (and I loosely quote) No one is allowed to put a hazard or thing in the way of a person with a disability to stop them from living a normal and healthy life. Suddenly telling a person in a wheelchair to walk on stilts or he isn't allowed to enter a store to buy food has become legal. Telling an autistic, SPD and PTSD sufferer they must wear the mask that causes them to be unable to breath, literally hurts their skin, presses on their scars causing more pain and touching what triggers their PTSD, as well as shoving a thermometer in their face also triggering PTSD and requesting personal private information from them (while their doctor is not even at liberty to write the name of their diagnosed condition if they have a doctor's note to take sick leave from work, but suddenly the store clerk may ask your temperature or what other symptoms you have), and your severe eczema can get ignored while you are forced to get sprayed by some unknown substance at the entrance to every store and place you go. And if you say no, they tell you then you don't eat and you're politically incorrect and a danger to everyone around you. You are no longer a human with rights and needs. You are a walking corona virus waiting to infect your next victim. I have to choose between the 9+ existing medical conditions I already live and deal with every day - none of which is spreadable or contagious to anyone else, but extreme and unbearable for me to deal with daily as it is - and corona. I'm forced to dealing my existing conditions and adding debilitating and life threatening masks, painful and dangerous hand sanitizing procedures, and PTSD triggering and privacy intruding temperature checks to my life, and eat, or still have my existing conditions and don't eat. When did this become legal?
Thank you for your post Valerie. Well worded. Thank you.
Re: Non mask wearers
Thanks for your thoughts and sharing your experience, Mary. Yes, those whose disability presents serious issues with mask wearing deserve our compassion and consideration, and reasonable accommodations. Surely there are ways to protect public health and safety while respecting individual needs.
Autistic persons wearing masks
My son has high functioning autism and he works in a grocery store as a cashier and he d*mn sure does wear a mask while at work in the store. He is actually afraid of covid. Not all autistic people are incapable of wearing a mask and should be encouraged to wear a mask when going to the supermarket. My son would appreciate if everyone wears a mask.
Re: Autistic persons
Thanks for sharing about your son, jdenino. Good to keep in mind that we shouldn't make assumptions about anyone, and that more mask wearing is better for all.
Re: Non mask wearers
Thank you for reading and commenting, Valerie. A few thoughts I had in response:
Anonymous wrote:They do not filter all microbes
Yes, though they have been shown to lower risk.
Anonymous wrote:and could do more than good, especially if contaminated.
This could be true, like seat belts can trap a person in a car. But the overall risk appears to be lower with wearing one. Washing it regularly, or replacing, would make good sense.
Anonymous wrote:They do not replace hand washing or social distancing.
One hundred percent agree with you here. Additional measures are needed. Seat belts are good. So are brakes!
Anonymous wrote:if a person got into an elevator waving a hand gun and you felt your life was threatened, wouldn't you get off the elevator or call for help? But you don't. Why?
Absolutely I would. This level of aberrant behavior and possible lethality would be serious cause for concern.
Anonymous wrote:The vast majority of people who died of covid were being cared for by people wearing masks.
Yes, though I don't think you're suggesting the masks caused the deaths?
Anonymous wrote:the use of mass produced masks with synthetic fibres for the entire global population, creates a staggering amount of waste, every single day. These cannot be recycled, since they are bio-hazardous waste, which means they are polluting the earth at an exponential rate.
Not exponential, but yes, an impressive amount of waste. Reusable fabric is better in this regard. Many stylish options are available for the discerning mask wearer. :)
Anonymous wrote:As far as the politics are concerned - it is polarizing extremism, and media fear mongering that has caused people to actually believe that those who do not wear masks are out to kill them. This is very dangerous thinking indeed!
That would be a dangerous way to think, but I don't think that's the main argument. It's a public health issue. More masks means less overall risk. Fewer cases. Fewer deaths. And a quicker return to something like normal.
Thanks again. Stay well!
Morality and Mortality
Good observation, thank you!
Re: Morality and Mortality
Thanks, Julie!
re: article about masks creating conflict and rage
I have lung cancer and can't breathe when I wear a mask, I don't want to tell others about my personal health problems but I get "dirty looks" from others when I am at the store without a mask on. I would love it if people would treat each other with respect and understand others may have health issues.
Any suggestions?
Re: re: article about
I'm sorry to hear it, cantbreathe. Your situation underscores why we should assume less about others' mask-wearing behavior. If you don't want to divulge anything about your health, maybe the best you can do is to give others as much space as possible. Maybe other readers have suggestions, too. Thank you for sharing your comments.
cantbreathe with a mask.
Wow I'm sorry to hear about you having lung cancer but you shouldn't be going out in public with COVID circulating. Please get someone else to pick up your groceries. Good luck.
BIAS
The political bias showed in this article. Though you made a minute effort to be fair. Lol
Re: BIAS
Ha! Thanks question mark. But seriously, thanks for reading, KURT. It must depend on one's own political preferences. I'm always curious with these kinds of statements which way a person leans. I've had comments about how well balanced the post was, how I'm obviously a liberal, and how I'm a pawn of conservatives. It's hard to say anything now that's not interpreted as political bias because someone's going to disagree with it, assume it's political, and get their political feelings hurt. For what it's worth, I'm an Independent. And I place no stock in any political party to solve the problems that ail us. In any case, thanks for taking the time to comment. And stay well, darn it!
Masks and the deaf
I’m deaf. It makes it much more difficult to communicate with people in public if you can’t see their face. I’ve been flying into rages everywhere I go until I get some measure of customer service. If the world makes no sense for a deaf person then I’ll force it to make sense and god help you if you’re in my way. Now what do you have to say about that, mr hearing doctor whiz kid know it all. You wouldn’t last 4 mins in my shoes.
Re: Masks and the deaf
I appreciate the point you raise, Joe Smith, your tone notwithstanding. I'd be mad, too. It's another reason we need more understanding of one another during this pandemic as we all do our best to stay safe and live life. It's unfortunate that masks with clear plastic over the mouth aren't more commonly in use, though I don't know how much that helps with reading lips. Wishing you well through this time.
Masks
Hi Seth,
I'm so glad you wrote about this issue, another great article!
It's tragic that the issue of wearing a mask is now a political stance!
I'm a moderate conservative but I'm not aligning myself with those who packed together protesting. I look at the footage of these people and I'm imaging those same people will demanding to be treated for the virus they will probably acquire. With that, it will be putting more strain on the already overworked medical community.
I've been wearing a mask to the store for a month now, and at first most people were wearing them. Now, very few are wearing them. It's alarming how people are clumping together, talking and laughing, without masks.
I wish to God, that Trump will start recommending wearing masks!
In the meantime, my husband and I aren't waiting to take measures to help to stop the spread!
Hoping you and your family will remain safe!
Re: Masks
Hi, Mille! Lovely comments, as usual. I agree, how sad that this has all become so political. Inevitable, I suppose, when there are real incentives for politicizing everything. I loved how your comments showed that politics doesn't trump everything (no pun intended)—that we can make our own decisions about issues that tend to fall along party lines. Thank you for doing what you can to stay safe and to protect others' health. I receive your well wishes and wish the same for you and yours. :)
Hard to believe
Hard to believe that politics would trump public health, but I guess I'm just being naive. I have a relative who lives in a country where you pretty much have no admittance anywhere if you are maskless. Does this infringe on personal freedom? Yes, in principle, but being maskless impinges on the freedom of others to live in good health, an argument that has been made many times already. I don't think I'm comparing apples to oranges when I say that someone going maskless is akin to someone who might be infected with an STI having sex without a condom. We'd (all?) be pretty disgusted with that second person... I hope.
Re: Hard to believe
I know what you mean, Amazed—all too easy to believe, but so unfortunate. You make good points, including about the tradeoffs in our personal freedoms. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
Masks and Political Party Platforms
I'm glad I read this post because it opened my eyes to the fact that Republicans tend to lean towards not wearing masks while Democrats tend to wear them. Before reading this article, my guess would have been the other way around. Perhaps that's because I usually vote Republican, yet I believe everyone should wear a mask and that it's too soon to open the economy back up.
Re: Masks and Political
Thanks for your comments, Josh. You're a good example of how it's possible to think for oneself, rather than following party tendencies! Unfortunately that seems to be rare. I actually don't know, though, how strong this trend is. I'm sure studying are being done about it (e.g., % of Republicans vs. Democrats who wear face masks). Actually a quick search showed an article that found that 74% of Dems wear them and 56% of Republicans. Those are important #s because they show that it's not a black-or-white issue (like most political divides), but rather different emphases. Both parties are more likely to wear a mask, but Dems are relatively more likely to.
Studies
Seth J. Gillihan Ph.D. wrote:I actually don't know, though, how strong this trend is. I'm sure studying are being done about it (e.g., % of Republicans vs. Democrats who wear face masks). Actually a quick search showed an article that found that 74% of Dems wear them and 56% of Republicans. Those are important #s because they show that it's not a black-or-white issue (like most political divides), but rather different emphases. Both parties are more likely to wear a mask, but Dems are relatively more likely to.
I wonder why these studies are even necessary. Why does it even matter. Statistics can be manipulated. I'm also quite skeptical of the motivation behind such studies. What purpose does it really serve other than to get misused by the media to create division--there always seems to be some kind of self-serving agenda for political gain.
I tend to decline any participation in studies for this reason. As an example I was solicited by my local water company to participate in a survey, which was conducted by a university located outside of my region/state. At the end it inquired what political party I belonged too, along with some other questions which I found suspect. What conclusions are they going to jump too based on my response. I'm sick of it. I don't feel such questions are neutral or done with good intent.
Re: Studies
Thanks for your comments, Perpetual. It's a good point—we should consider who's doing a study to understand what might be their motivation. A lot of psychology studies seem to be done to show that conservatives are inferior to liberals. That's my view, anyway. There are probably many researchers who are just curious, but it's hard to deny the strong left bias throughout academic research.
WHY TO SACRE OF FACE MASK?
Because they do not want to expose their Ugli face and hollow brain. In their racist brain they think that it is Muslim ladies Hijab and they cannot accept that.
Re: WHY TO SACRE
Thanks for commenting, john237. That may be a factor for some individuals, but I'm guessing not for the majority.... I'll be interested to see what future studies show about reasons for choosing not to wear a mask.
A counter-opinion
I don't believe masks improve the conditions beyond statistical significance, based on the research I have seen and my intuition of how airborne disease spreads. If Covid-19 survives for so much longer than normal on surfaces, why are we not being told to keep our hands extremely clean, something that has shown to transmit infections (in general) at greater concentrations than airborne transmission? We should at a bare minimum, be required to have clean hands going into AND out of any publicly accessible structure during a pandemic. I see the fetishization of masks as a solution (when they have only been found to reduce intake of ultra fine particles ~45% under normal conditions (see paper "Effectiveness of facemasks to reduce exposure hazards for airborne infections among general populations"), not enough to protect you from a puff of an infectious disease nor enough to halt the spread of an emission into the environment. We should be considering better methods of protection. How about protecting your eyes, for example?
A counter-opinion
I appreciate your comments, Bob. I'm not a medical expert so I can't comment on the ultimate effectiveness of masks. I'm relying on the CDC and people like Dr. Fauci who seem to have expertise in this area. I don't think anyone is saying that masks alone are the solution, or that they are 100% effective. And more of the emphasis seems to be on preventing the spread *to others,* not protecting oneself. In any case, a 45% reduction would seem to be significantly greater than a 0% reduction, so perhaps one component of the solution. You do raise an important point that it's worth thinking about other (additional) measures that could be helpful. Thank you for sharing your counter perspective.
Filter
Furnace filters without the fiberglass, has been closest to n95 masks. They are Mers 2200. It takes a little effort to take the metal screen off, but not much. We cut the screen material small enough to fit in the pockets of our masks. We had enough to give to family and friends. We have no problem with being able to breathe through it. After all the filter is meant to allow air flow.
Re: Filter
Thank you, Mille. That's great to know. The mother of a neighbor friend of ours was kind enough to make us some cloth masks, which have pockets for a filter. And good point about air flow!
Filters
Hey Seth, my husband likes to do research on this type of thing. Hope it works for you!
To mask or not to mask, that is the question
OK...I'm in a state where masks are not required. Small population, under 40 deaths to date statewide from COVID 19. We are blessed with space to move around. BUT today, for the first time since this whole thing began, I decided to wear a mask to shop for groceries at Walmart....which has a sign btw, that says "Shopper are recommended to wear masks"...not required! SO..... I wore the mask and little did I know that my claustrophibia (which to date I would have classified as very mild!) took on an entirely new dimension!
While wearing my mask, my heart started pounding, my pulse racing, chest pain, arms going numb, nausea and dizziness. OMG.... I had to take one load of groceries to the car, take a break, remove my mask, then go back to get a few things I didn't get the first time through.
So what, you say? Well, thankfully our state still has only "suggestion" of masks. I don't think I'll be wearing one in public until and unless it becomes law. I'll continue to use common sense about hygiene protocols we all learned in grade school (i.e. proper hand washing, etc.); I'll not go out if I'm ill; I'll follow cleanliness in the home I've practiced my whole life...and yes, I'm even in what the CDC and WHO call "higher risk group" because I'm over 65!!!! But the last time I was sick was 3 years ago so maybe, just maybe, my immune system is strong from what I do daily rather than 'sheltering at home' , being treated merely as a "possible carrier of a pathogen", as one author referred to.
There are differing expert opinions about this entire crisis...but those opinions are sometimes hard to find. They'll come out and often are quickly silenced because they don't meet with what most of the media is touting.
Bottom line--- there is some common sense to be wielded here, my friends. This is not a "one size fits all" approach. We cannot tell those who live in sparsely populated areas to follow the guidelines of those who live in crowded NYC, Chicago, LA or other major metropolitian areas.
Be careful, be smart, be cautious but remember that which many have said "This too shall pass". There will be a tomorrow.
Re: To mask or
I appreciate your thoughts, Anna. You're certainly right that we need to have stricter social distancing where the coronavirus is a bigger problem (obviously why medical professionals go beyond simply wearing a mask when treating Covid patients, for example). Hopefully you're not in South Dakota, one of the few states with cases on the rise.
"So what?" would definitely not be my response to your claustrophobia reaction, which sounded like a full-on panic attack. That's no joke, and it's completely understandable that a person wouldn't want to wear a mask if they have that reaction.
As far as opinions that don't match the mainstream media, most of those also don't seem to match reality or common sense, which is most likely why they're hard to find.
I hope you and your stay well. Thanks for your comments.
Refuse to be muzzled
Masks, or any protective gear, is a matter of personal choice. Go along to get along? Hell No. The mania has got to stop, and this isn't a partisan issue. It's not only common sense, but about assault on our personal liberties.
Re: Refuse to be
I appreciate your expressing your opinion here, Rogue. It's actually a great example of the cognitive model—that the meaning of something (masks in this case) comes not from the thing itself but from our interpretation of it.
If a person sees a face mask as a personal liberty-assaulting muzzle, they're going to hate the idea of a mask. Another reader experienced a mask as a panic-inducing stimulus. I tend to see them as a minor inconvenience that I don't love wearing but that is more for others' protection than for mine, and I'm okay with that, on balance. I recently heard someone (maybe Matt McConaughey) describe them as a "badge of honor" or something to that effect, which would lead to a different feeling and willingness to wear them. When we understand the story we're telling ourselves, or that others are telling themselves, the feelings and actions often make sense.
As far as personal choice, we do set some limits when our actions could endanger others, like limits on speed. And people over 21 in the US can drink themselves to death, as long as they don't take the highways while drunk. It does seem we need to balance personal freedom and collective responsibility. Thanks again for your comments.
mask
I agree it is an assault on our personal liberties as well as one on our mental health.I have literally been trapped in my house for the last six months because my state has a mask mandate that my county is enforcing with fines. I'm poor can't pay this at all plus I have claustrophobia.I can't work because my job requires masks and I panic to the point of passing out. My friend has PTSD coupled with claustrophobia and a fear of masks. I have had to talk her out of suicide three times already and talked the cops out of shooting her when she mistook them, because they were wearing masks, for the person that traumatized her. I was apolitical before this began now I am voting for whoever will end this.
Re: mask
Sorry to hear about your experience, jraven. It's worth checking if your area has an exception for health reasons. Pennsylvania where I live does, as do many other states. Thanks for your comments—I wish you all the best.
What's fair?
What's fair, Rogue? I'm sorry, but when I think of liberty - and of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights - I don't think of the issue of suggesting or even requiring that people wear face-masks in the midst of a global pandemic. That's assuming you accept the evidence that we're in the midst of a global pandemic. What about when your "liberty" to not wear a mask potentially infringes on my liberty (no quote marks) to remain healthy? I wonder how the Founding Fathers would answer? Of course, it would be a trivial response to say that they knew nothing about pandemics. Any Constitutional scholars out there?
Re: What's fair?
Thanks for your thoughts, Amazed. That's the key question, isn't it—at what point does one's liberty infringe on my pursuit of happiness?
I have no doubt the Founding Fathers knew about disease and epidemics. Ben Franklin lost his son, "a fine boy of four years old," to smallpox. The big issues we grapple with seem to have been anticipated by the authors of the Constitution, who aimed to balance individual rights and the common good. I appreciate your comments.
Your pursuit of 'happiness?'
Wrong word, Seth. We are talking about the pursuit of 'health' not 'happiness' (although as I psychologist I know that you know that the former can lead to the latter). Your comment about Franklin is well-taken and I thank you for informing me. And your second-to-last sentence seems to summarize the issue extremely well. Is the solution a moral one? An ethical one? A legal one (surely not, at least not right now)? But I must repeat my question, especially given that so many opponents to face-masks call on the writings of our Founding Fathers, even if indirectly (and some rather militantly so, given demonstrations outside capitol buildings in many states). Please show me the words, sentences/phrases that justify YOUR choices putting MY well-being in jeopardy. Not a tricky question. We who read PSYCHOLOGY TODAY work with evidence, so please us show what's there.
Re: Your pursuit of
I guess it depends on how you define "happiness," Amazed. I understand the FF to have meant something like "well-being," not simply an emotional experience. (I was riffing on the Declaration when I wrote that about liberty vs. pursuit of happiness. Maybe the "life" part would have been more apt!)
And I will wait with you for the justification you're asking for!
Philosophy, politics, and the health of the nation
It may be that Thomas Jefferson, if not others, did see 'health' in the same way as we do today, and not just in terms of general well-being, given the likelihood that the thoughts of John Locke influenced that Founding Father. But that's arguable and we may be just being pedantic. Like you, Seth, I still would like to see the avid non-mask-wearers (who are often avid flag-wavers) explain why their feelings trump my health. I've seen no convincing explanation or justification so far in any of the mainstream media - perhaps I'm looking at the wrong sources. FYI, I live on the border with Idaho, where there are quite a few very enthusiastic no-maskers who also are very enthusiastic flag-wavers. It is hard not to notice that some carry guns and sport swastikas when attending demonstrations extolling liberty - presumably, liberty for all. I hear a lot of shouting but I see nothing by way of logical argument. And let me say that, while I am left of center, left of center arguments also can leave a lot to be desired in terms of emotion over logic. If we can't lay aside partisan politics at this time, at least in part, then I fear for the health of the 'more perfect union' conceived by our Founding Fathers in The Preamble: the health of our core philosophy and our people.
Re: Philosophy, politics, and
Those are appalling ironies you note, Amazed—how have "liberty" and Nazism become intertwined, for example? And I appreciate your call for non-partisanship, and your recognition that irrational emotional appeals are not exclusive to the right! Stay stafe and stay well....
Maskless in America: are we alone?
I wonder if this aversion to masks in the name of liberty (and I appreciate there may be valid medical reasons to go maskless) is something peculiar to the U.S. and, perhaps, countries with political systems similar to our own. Are the Brits, Spanish, Italians, French demonstrating as vociferously as are some of we Americans? If they are, then it doesn't appear to be making the newspapers in those countries (some of which can be read on-line). But, maybe the truth is being hidden from us...
Re: Maskless in America
It's a good Q, Amazed. My guess is there's something peculiarly American about it, just like we seem to stand alone in mass shootings. I suspect it'd be big news if some individuals in other countries were mounting similar protests.
Time to put masks to bed? NO!!!
It may be just the two of us now, Seth, and these may well be my final thoughts. Pardon the (rather weak) pun, but why U.S.? I won't carelessly blame the Second Amendment (truly), but I'm not aware of any other nation, comparable to us politically, that fetishizes guns - AND THEIR USE - as we do. And I deliberately choose the word 'fetishizes.' Hunting rifles, OK; assault rifles, pushing it for me. Gun ownership and use in the U.S. are just one way - albeit a GIGANTIC one - in which we seem to be so very different from what is considered to be acceptable in our peer nations. Of course, maybe they're naive fools.
We Americans talk about freedom and liberty and individualism as if no other person today in a republican (in the true sense of the word) or a democratic society anywhere else in the world enjoys the same things we do, such as freedom of assembly, the press, and religious belief (OK, firearms invariably excepted). Maybe the core of all of this - masks, guns, flags, the whole thing - boils down to the idea of American exceptionalism. We're different. We're special. We're chosen. We're the shining city on the hill (or the other way round - I don't recall). We have an almost Divine right to call the shots. And it isn't just our society that's exceptional and special - so am I, as an individual. ME wear a mask? No, YOU wear a darn mask! Sensibly regulate the sales of firearms? Do what YOU want, but don't dare tread on MY rattlesnake!
Our sheen - city, hill or both - seems to have gotten rather tarnished in recent years. But that's an issue for another day. I fear we may be straying further from thinking about masked versus naked faces than was your original intent, Seth. But then maybe that was your aim... Maybe...
Re: Time to put
I'm not sure, Amazed, but I suspect that exceptionalism is part of it. I remember growing up and not being able to believe my good luck that I was born into the best country in the world. I kind of felt sorry for all those other countries that weren't America. That was before I'd traveled abroad, of course. I still love this country and think it's exceptional as nations go, but I know you're getting at something more fundamental. And yes, I'm perfectly content to have expanded the discussion beyond masks! Thanks for your thoughts.
- Previous
- Page 1 (current)
- Next