Are High-Achieving Women Doomed to Be Single and Childless?

I think many women will find it hard to respect a less achieving husband and as such that is where the problems arise.

The idea of a "house husband" sounds grand until he puts their feet to sleep.

"... are highly-educated women romantically-undesirable, doomed to end up single and childless?"

This is a loaded question. By using the word 'doomed' it makes the assumption that being single or childless are catastrophes for women. They are not.

Education makes women believe that they are worth more and that they deserve the best. The second best won't do.
The unmarried and childless women have rejected many beta males, who would have given them a good home life. The alpha males won't have them, since they can find nice and quiet wives.

Women need to get over the alpha male attraction. It's hard because they fall in love with such guys. There is a need to overcome the whispers of our foremothers. Please marry a wimp!

Are High-Achieving Women Doomed to be Single and Childless?

In exactly the same way that younger women have used older men, older women will be used by younger men. How could any idiot presume that women have higher morals than men? Older women with money will go after younger, hunkier men - just as older men go after younger, more ripe women. I hope no one here assumes differently. If they do, they're only fooling themselves. Younger men cannot reproduce with older women due to fertility issues. Older women are "safe".

My Take on the Future of the World

Women are quite happy to depend on the government if the father doesn't meet her expectations. Men are quite happy too, as higher taxes are a lot better than complete financial annihilation through divorce. Governments love higher taxes. Many same sex couples are going to want children. As the decline in heterosexual “marital” relationships continues (and it will), more and more will opt for same sex relationships/domestic partnerships/cohabitation. Traditionalist views on relationships will gradually become extinct (like the dodo and dinosaur). Polygamist like relationships and/or the broad acceptance of polygamist domestic partnerships amongst heterosexuals, bisexuals, homosexuals and lesbians will become more popular as well.

Female empowerment means that there are fewer men capable of providing for a family (hence the decline of marriage). Women want the highest paying, most prestigious jobs for themselves. As divorce is nearly a death sentence for breadwinning males, men are opting out of marriage and family.

Most every bread winning man now knows the devastating consequences that divorce can have on their lives. The result of divorce is often severe psychological, emotional, legal, physical and financial destruction. For these reasons, men will continue to opt out of marriage and family or resort to cohabitation as a lessor of the two evils. As women become the majority of breadwinners (and they will), they’ll feel the same way.

Feminism taught women that marriage was slavery. Breadwinning men now know that marriage is a death trap (took them long enough). Both sides are in many ways correct. Women were at one point in time abused in marriage and through divorce, left destitute. They're not going back to those times. For the past several decades, the shoe has been on the other foot and it's mostly men that have been destroyed through divorce. Men are opting out in ever growing numbers.

The liberal/feminist model of heterosexual marriage has and will continue to fail. Most men aren’t going to allow themselves to be ruled by women in relationships. Women think they want to have power over men in relationships, but have no respect for and are repulsed by the men that aren’t at least their equal in terms of education, finances and social standing. Both sides under the liberal/feminist model are far more promiscuous, more likely to commit adultery and more likely to indulge in infidelity – even in the face of STDs. The playing field for the worst in human behavior is level under the feminist/liberal model.

To sustain the population, prop up the GDP through population growth and to save the entitlement programs, the only solution from the government’s standpoint is mass welfare and tax breaks for single mothers and/or mass immigration. As xenophobia is common everywhere, the preferred method is going to be the mass acceptance of single motherhood and a massive increase in services for single mothers (through higher taxes and/or the diversion of tax funds). More resources will be dedicated to same sex couples under this expanding model as well. This change is social values has been around for a while, is the norm in certain countries (the Netherlands, for example) and will eventually become the norm across the globe.

As time marches on, fewer and fewer will marry, out of wedlock births will become the majority, polygamy will be legalized, same sex marriage will become more popular and children raised by same sex couples will become widely accepted. The alternative is the threat of massive population decline like that found in Japan. A return to a "traditional culture" like that of the '50s is highly unlikely for obvious reasons.

As marriage/birth rates decline, huge increases in spending on single mothers will ensue (it already has in several countries). As time passes, greater and greater efforts to enact legislation that benefits women at the expense of men’s lives will increase. Even though women already have enormous gynocentric privilege through current laws and policies, ever more misandric legislation is currently being pushed across the globe.

What's happening in the Netherlands and Scandinavia is spreading globally; Japan, Singapore, Canada, the UK, the Middle East, Hong Kong, the US, etc. Parts of the Netherlands and Scandinavia are widely touted as social(ist) utopias in American mainstream media. What’s not talked about by the mainstream media is the declining marriage/birth rates, high taxes, high cost of goods, the increase in misandry through legislation and social upheaval due to mass immigration. What’s not talked about is that, where mass immigration is used to counter low marriage/birth rates, what follows is social upheaval, unsustainable spikes in welfare costs, the formation of xenophobic immigrant communities, the illegal implementation of laws within these communities (sharia – for example) and a disproportionate increase in crime emanating from these communities. In the US, immigration is used as a form of low-wage and/or slave labor and as a means to stagnate/lower wages.

Because of the above, the push for ever more misandric laws will increase. Why? Because women make the babies and women won’t have the same power over men that they had through marriage. Cohabitation reform (aka: palimony) is going to come soon (to force transfer of wealth from men to women). This is already being proposed in the UK and other places. Redefining domestic abuse (in marriage/cohabitation) in terms of bullying and denying monetary resources is also being pushed in the UK and other places (to force the transfer of resources from men to women). “Yes Means Yes” is just another way for women to destroy men’s lives when women don’t get what they want and/or to preserve women’s desire for lack of personal agency and responsibility (women don’t want to be held accountable for their actions and they want men to be punished when a woman doesn’t get what she wants). It’s going to get much, much worse for men. Hades hath no wrath…

Queue MGTOW:

MGTOW is the natural, equal and opposite reaction to misandric gender feminists and naïve white knights. MGTOW is the growing realization by men that they are disposable (think male only selective service). MGTOW is the realization among men that marriage/relationships 2.0 can lead to disastrous psychological, emotional, legal, financial, physical and spiritual destruction. MGTOW is a survival strategy. MGTOW don't validate themselves through relationships with women.

MGTOW get it. MGTOW understand cultural misandry. MGTOW are the next step in the evolution of men. To understand MGTOW, one has to ask themselves questions developed by MRAs:

Why do men pay 97% of alimony and child support when men and women are equal?
Why do men get tougher prison sentences for equal crimes?
Why is there still affirmative action for women when women make up half the work force and a higher percentage of college graduates?
Why do women want quotas for the highest paid, most powerful, most prestigious positions and not the dirty, dangerous, life threatening positions?
If men and women are equal, why is most social spending directed at women (cancer research, homeless shelters, welfare for single mothers, etc.)?
Why is circumcision not considered genital mutilation?
Why is selective service male-only?
Why don’t men have reproductive rights? Why does “my body, my choice” equate to men’s money?
Don’t the above questions represent blatant, massive discrimination against men solely for the benefit of women? Of course they do. Women make the babies.

How do MRAs and MGTOW differ? MGTOW understand that society will become increasingly misandric as time goes on. MGTOW fully appreciate that MRAs, although noble, are wasting their time. MGTOW represents an evolution of MRA.

Many women view MGTOW as misogynists. Why? They’re choosing the only escape from discrimination against men that exists. What’s that? Minimizing, to the extent possible, women’s destructive influence and power over their lives (AKA: relationships and marriage 2.0). This pisses many women off – so they label MGTOW (and men in general) as misogynists – thereby making the word meaningless (anyone that doesn’t think gynocentrically or with feminist overtones is now a misogynist/extremist).

Feminism and anti-feminism are two sides of the same coin. Both wish to hold onto the aspects of the patriarchy that benefit them the most while eschewing the aspects of the patriarchy that don’t specifically benefit women. The difference between a feminist and anti-feminist amounts to cherry picking.

This article goes well with the views of Karen Horney. She stated that there are conflicts in women's roles, the tradiotional against the modern. Should a women find a man, or her own identity? Thankfully, the time has come where a woman does not have to exclude one for the other, but would be wise to create her own career and identity before marriage.

Hello it's me, I am also visiting this web page regularly, this
site is really good and the users are really sharing fastidious thoughts.

Career Women are the Real Reason why many of us Good Men are still Single today because they're so very Greedy And Selfish since it is always about them. And God forbid if they would ever go with a man that makes much Less Money than they do which really would be a Miracle. Quite a Change in the women of today compared to the Good old fashioned women of years ago that were so completely Different which many of us Good Men would have been all settled down by now had we been born back then since it was Very Easy finding Love in those days which today it is like looking for a Needle in a Haystack.

The reason they can not find a man is really very simple.
Short answer: they are dating above your sexual market value and are overvaluing themselves.
If you want a man to marry you, you must be his best option. If he can get a younger, more beautiful women, with better personality and more virtue, he will. He may have a short term hook up with you, if he is lonely right now. But he will not take you seriously if he has much better options.
It is like if an average joe tries to pick up hot, young women. They will brush him off in seconds. He must look for average looking women, because that is the most he can get.
Men and women are attracted to different things, men are mainly attracted to, in this order: 1) youth and beauty, 2) virtue, 3) personality. Women are mainly attracted to, in this order: 1) money and status, 2) alpha trades, 3) personality.
Notice that career, money, and being strong and independent are not in that list for what men are attracted to. Men have more of what women want, usually in his late 30´s or early 40´s, which is money, status, etc. And women have more of what men what usually in her 20´s, looks and virtue. So, it is much easier for a 30 or 40-year-old man to pick up a woman in her 20´s that it is for a man in his 20´s.
So, if you are a 40 year old women looking for a man in his 40´s to marry you in NY, just simply forget it, specially if he is very successful. You missed your window to get the hot rich men in NY. If you want commitment, try men in their 50´s or 60´s, honestly.

Well since the great majority of these women really think they really are the greatest thing walking the face of this earth with their noses up in the air, which they have the worse attitude of them all along with no manners and personality either. It is very sad that most of these women are like this now which unfortunately they really have destroyed On Line dating for many of us very serious good men looking for an honest relationship today. I really can't believe how very awful that most women are nowadays since back in the past which most women at that time were Real Ladies and the very complete opposite of today. A much better class of women that we had back in the good old days which is why love really did come easy with no problem at all. And i will certainly say that most women back then really did put these very pathetic loser women today to total shame altogether as well. Career women are total losers as well in my book. No wonder why many of us good single men can't find love at all now since we really aren't to blame here at all, especially when many of these women for no reason at all will Curse at us men when we will just say good morning or hello to them. MGTOW is the very smart and safe way for many of us men now which will certainly save our life altogether.

Lot's of these high achieving women are beyond their 30s and have done the cock carousel for many years with some alpha males. All of the sudden the want to "settle down" with some beta guy. But then thunder....The good guys are not there. The almost good guys are still there but they can't meet the demands of the high achievers. The good and smart guys already settled down with the smart women who value family over career. So ladies...enjoy your career and your cats as you get older.

The great majority of these women today do ride the cock carousel since they really like sleeping around with so many different men all the time unfortunately, and they will never be wife material at all to begin with anyway since they will only go with men that have big mega bucks as well. The trouble is that most of these so called career women are just complete users and losers since they just use men that have money which makes them real Gold Diggers also. And now that feminism is everywhere today which a lot of these women are real men haters as well.

This article is ideology-driven and women are well advised to seek better sources.

It's also possibly manipulative as the author, most likely unconsciously, seeks to lower the competition from other women.