Infidelity
When Does Chatting Become Cheating?
Exploring the many (ambiguous) layers of online infidelity.
Updated December 25, 2024 Reviewed by Davia Sills
Key points
- Social media and dating apps can connect people with potential partners, even when they're already taken.
- From sexting to relationship concealment, online infidelity can take many forms.
- Clear communication about online boundaries and expectations is crucial to avoid misunderstandings.
In today’s always-connected world, where smartphones rarely leave our hands and social media is like a second home, romantic relationships face challenges unlike ever before. Social media platforms and dating apps make it easier than ever to connect with others (Abassi & Alghamdi, 2018) - including people other than our partners.
Thanks to the sense of anonymity that comes with online interactions, these connections can feel low-risk and exciting. Scholars refer to this as the online disinhibition effect (Suler, 2004), where the screen acts as a safety net, encouraging people to say and do things they might avoid in person.
It’s a dynamic that has opened the door to online infidelity - a modern twist on an age-old issue that puts trust to the test. But what exactly is online infidelity, and where do we draw the line between harmless scrolling and a betrayal of trust?
What does online infidelity look like?
Online infidelity isn’t one-size-fits-all. It spans a variety of behaviors, making it difficult to draw clear lines about what constitutes betrayal (Schokkenbroek, 2024). It shows up in a variety of ways, from emotional to sexual connections, each carrying its own impact on relationships. Here’s a closer look at the most common types:
1. Emotional connection
Emotional infidelity occurs when one partner forms a deep emotional bond with someone outside their relationship (Cravens & Whiting, 2016). This might include sharing personal thoughts or secrets that are typically reserved for their partner, building emotional intimacy through chats or private messages, or discussing personal issues, including relationship problems, with an online confidant (McDaniel et al., 2017; Luo et al., 2010).
This form of infidelity can be particularly painful for the betrayed partner because it involves a level of intimacy and emotional investment that may rival - or even surpass - the bond within the primary relationship (Guadagno & Sagarin, 2010). Even though there’s no physical element, the emotional distance created can be devastating.
2. Sexual interactions
Sexual infidelity online includes behaviors such as “sexting,” which is the sending and receiving of flirtatious or sexually suggestive messages, photos, or videos, or engaging in cybersex via video call or other digital formats, often accompanied by self-stimulation (e.g., Adam, 2019; Liu & Zheng, 2018). While no physical contact occurs, these behaviors can feel deeply violating to the betrayed partner. They blur the line between virtual and physical intimacy, making it difficult to dismiss them as “just online.”
3. Secrecy and neglect
This form of infidelity centers on hiding online interactions or prioritizing someone else over the primary relationship. Behaviors include deleting messages, chats, or call logs to cover up interactions, keeping an online contact a secret or avoiding mentioning them to one’s partner, or spending excessive time communicating with someone else online at the expense of quality time with one’s partner (Luo et al., 2010; Vossler & Moller, 2020). This secrecy can erode trust, while emotional neglect may lead to feelings of loneliness and resentment in the relationship.
4. Relationship concealment
This type of infidelity occurs when someone hides or misrepresents their committed relationship to pursue other connections online. Examples include listing their relationship status as “single” on social media, avoiding sharing posts or content that involves their partner, or actively creating profiles on dating apps or other platforms designed to meet new people (Adam, 2019; Henline et al., 2007; Vossler & Moller, 2020).
Even if these actions don’t lead to direct interactions, they may signal a willingness to engage in infidelity and can undermine the foundation of exclusivity and commitment.
5. Cross-modal infidelity
Cross-modal infidelity bridges the gap between the online and offline worlds. It might include planning to meet an online connection in person, engaging in physical intimacy with someone first met online, or rekindling a past romantic or sexual relationship via online platforms and taking it offline (Vossler & Moller, 2020).
6. Secretive or transgressive pornography use
While opinions differ on whether pornography use counts as infidelity (Adam, 2019; Whitty, 2003), it can become a betrayal when it violates a couple’s agreed-upon boundaries. Problematic behaviors may include viewing pornography in secret, especially when it’s deliberately hidden from one’s partner, sharing explicit content (but not personal pictures or videos) with others online, or using pornography as a substitute for intimacy with one’s partner (Vossler & Moller, 2020).
For some couples, these actions may seem harmless, but for others, they may represent a significant breach of trust. The key lies in whether the behavior aligns with the couple’s expectations and boundaries.
Navigating the gray areas
At its heart, infidelity is about breaking trust or exclusivity in a committed relationship, and these breaches are just as likely to happen online (Docan-Morgan & Docan, 2007). But defining and recognizing online infidelity is far from straightforward - what feels like harmless fun for one person may be a serious betrayal for another (Falconer & Humphreys, 2019).
Adding to the confusion is the tendency to dismiss online interactions as “not real” because they lack physical contact. But the emotional and relational damage is very real - studies even suggest that emotional bonds formed online can be more damaging than physical infidelity that occurs face-to-face.
This gray area makes clear communication between partners essential. Couples need to openly discuss their boundaries for digital interactions and explore questions such as: Is it acceptable to flirt online, how transparent do they want and need to be about their online interactions, and what apps, platforms, or practices are off-limits? Having these conversations early can help avoid misunderstandings and ensure both partners are on the same page about what is and isn’t OK (Cravens & Whiting, 2016).
Online infidelity is a reality of modern romantic relationships. While it introduces new challenges, it also offers an opportunity for couples to revisit and redefine boundaries. By engaging in open communication, setting clear expectations, and prioritizing trust, couples can navigate this modern minefield together.
References
Abbasi, I. S., & Alghamdi, N. G. (2018). The pursuit of romantic alternatives online: Social media friends as potential alternatives. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 44(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2017.1308450
Adam, A. (2019). Perceptions of infidelity: A comparison of sexual, emotional, cyber-, and parasocial behaviors. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 13(2), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v13i2.376
Cravens, J. D., & Whiting, J. B. (2016). Fooling around on Facebook: The perceptions of infidelity behavior on social networking sites. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 15(3), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2014.1003670
Docan-Morgan, T., & Docan, C. A. (2007). Internet infidelity: Double standards and the differing views of women and men. Communication Quarterly, 55(3), 317-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370701492519
Falconer, T., & Humphreys, T. P. (2019). Sexting outside the primary relationship: Prevalence, relationship influences, physical engagement, and perceptions of "cheating". The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 28(2), 134-142. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2019-0011
Guadagno, R. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2010). Sex differences in jealousy: An evolutionary perspective on online infidelity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(10), 2636-2655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00674.x
Henline, B. H., Lamke, L. K., & Howard, M. D. (2007). Exploring perceptions of online infidelity. Personal Relationships, 14(1), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00144.x
Liu, Y., & Zheng, L. (2019). Influences of sociosexuality and commitment on online sexual activities: The mediating effect of perceptions of infidelity. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 45(5), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2018.1549632
Luo, S., Cartun, M. A., & Snider, A. G. (2010). Assessing extradyadic behavior: A review, a new measure, and two new models. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(3), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.033
McDaniel, B. T., & Drouin, M., & Cravens, J. D. (2017). Do you have anything to hide? Infidelity-related behaviors on social media sites and marital satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.031
Schokkenbroek, J.M. (2024) Here be dragons: Charting harmful technology use in romantic relationships. Ghent University.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 7(3), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
Vossler, A., & Moller, N. P. (2020). Internet affairs: Partners' perceptions and experiences of internet infidelity. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 46(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2019.1654577
Whitty, M. T. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men's and women's attitudes toward online and offline infidelity. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 569-579. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493103322725342