Skip to main content
Intelligence

Staying Curious Is the Most Dangerous Thing You Can Do

Curiosity disrupts comfort, but fuels sharper minds and longer lives.

Key points

  • Curiosity can be dangerous and is thus often suppressed, both by authority figures and by evolution itself.
  • Yet it's also immensely powerful, both as a weapon against bad ideas and a tool to boost well-being.
  • Curious brains age better; lifelong inquisitiveness lowers dementia risk, among other benefits.
  • Novel stimuli shift our experience of time, making it pass more slowly and building our sense of meaning.

With entropy having the last laugh in our universe, keeping even a semblance of order is itself a minor miracle. Your garden sprouts weeds, your tidy room inevitably drifts toward chaos, and a perfectly alphabetized bookshelf eventually looks like a ransom note, even if you could swear you had just organized it last week. Go figure.

Social order is no different. Democracies, stock exchanges, marriage vows, our most beloved brands, even the idea that a blue checkmark on your profile means anything—all of them survive only if we replicate the idea that they matter from one mind to the next.

Richard Dawkins saw this decades ago when he coined the term meme to describe ideas that copy themselves the way genes do. Some memes flourish (the germ theory of disease), others fade (celestial spheres), and plenty die quietly (sometimes leaving us with an unsolvable mystery when they do, such as the Victorian “third shaker” that lived on every dining table yet whose use is unknown).

What decides a meme’s fate? It's largely a matter of its resistance to curiosity.

Why Curiosity is So Powerful—and So Dangerous

Curiosity—especially the incessant stream of epistemological "whys" variety—dissolves pre-made assumptions faster than we can put them back together. Stack “why?” five times on almost any civic procedure, corporate policy, or family rule, and watch the very concept of it all unravel.

That is why curiosity has always worn a warning label.

It's what killed the cat, got Socrates his cup of hemlock, landed Galileo under house arrest, and it is still incredibly potent today. Try emailing your local planning board a choice chain of consecutive whys about a zoning decision and note how quickly patience in your presence evaporates.

Curiosity is dangerous in the literal sense, too. Evolution has built humans to stick with “good enough." Updating mental models is metabolically expensive and socially risky. If a superstition, ritual, or half-remembered proverb keeps you fed and alive, your genes are content—even if you miss the opportunity to uncover a deeper truth about the world in the process.

It is no wonder that study after study finds that curiosity wanes with age. Once we locate a workable path, an epistemological equivalent of "meh, why not," the cost–benefit ratio of further exploration looks lousy.

Why It's So Important to Keep Curiosity Alive

The world, and our very brain, conspire to cut curiosity off at the source, and it usually succeeds in doing just that. Yet the benefits of staying curious remain stubbornly documented as well. Lifespan studies show that older adults who remain intellectually adventurous maintain better cognitive functioning and enjoy lower dementia risk than their less curious peers (Valenzuela & Sachdev, 2006).

Not only that, lives led with curiosity also feel longer to boot. We all know how novel experiences stretch our perception of time, and days packed with fresh stimuli feel longer and more vivid than copy-and-paste routines (Matthews & Meck, 2014). Curiosity even predicts greater meaning in life and higher psychological well-being across cultures (Kashdan et al, 2018).

Longevity aside, curiosity is its own instant payoff. Spot an unanswered question—like a sealed envelope or half a snippet of gossip you desperately want the remainder of—and your brain floods with the same feel-good chemistry that chases a bite of chocolate (Kang et al., 2009). It’s a pleasant itch begging to be scratched, and every fresh fact delivers a small dopamine hit.

Even if curiosity never improved memory, lengthened life, or toppled bad ideas, we’d still seek it out for that sheer moment-to-moment delight of discovering something new. If this isn't enough reason to keep this intrinsically dangerous habit alive, nothing is.

How to Reignite Your Curiosity at Any Age

Although we might lose our childlike affinity with the art of curiosity, getting back in the saddle is easy. One way to start is by asking out-of-range questions.

Epistemological trespass—or venturing beyond your domain—is a delightful act of epistemological anarchy that drags hidden assumptions into daylight. So that means if you’re an engineer, quiz an anthropologist about infrastructure. If you’re a lawyer, read fluid dynamics. If public speaking terrifies you, ask one question at every conference, even if it's the last thing you would ever want to do.

Set yourself up with a "why" quota and compete with others for asking a question that has the other party talking in response for the longest. Our capacity for curiosity grows incrementally, and crossing borders of knowledge multiplies our chances of landing on a “why?” that will end up paying us back, big time.

And although curiosity lengthens subjective time, strengthens cognition, and exposes better ways to live, remember that it is not free. It threatens fragile memes, generates social friction, and consumes metabolic resources.

The cost is precisely why curiosity is rare, precious, and worth cultivating. A life stripped of it shrinks into routine; a life fed by it becomes, paradoxically, both longer and larger.

So go forth and be curious, if only to ask why you ever stopped.

References

Chu L, Fung HH. Age Differences in State Curiosity: Examining the Role of Personal Relevance. Gerontology. 2022;68(3):321-329. doi: 10.1159/000516296. Epub 2021 Jun 1. PMID: 34062532.

Giambra LM, Camp CJ, Grodsky A. Curiosity and stimulation seeking across the adult life span: cross-sectional and 6- to 8-year longitudinal findings. Psychol Aging. 1992 Mar;7(1):150-7. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.7.1.150. PMID: 1558700.

Matthews WJ, Meck WH. Time perception: the bad news and the good. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;5(4):429-446. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1298. PMID: 25210578; PMCID: PMC4142010.

Kashdan, T. B., Stiksma, M. C., Disabato, D. J., McKnight, P. E., Bekier, J., Kaji, J., & Lazarus, R. (2018). The five-dimensional curiosity scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 130–149.

advertisement
More from T. Alexander Puutio Ph.D.
More from Psychology Today