Mating
Why So Many Young People Feel Doomed About Straight Dating
The rise of “heteropessimism” in a polarized world.
Posted August 28, 2025 Reviewed by Jessica Schrader
Key points
- More young women lean left as men move right, widening the political gap in dating.
- Heteropessimism names regret and hopelessness about straight relationships.
- Unequal labor and dating fatigue may fuel rising disillusionment with love.
“Dating is hopeless.” “Men are trash.” “I wish I liked women.”
If you’ve scrolled through social media lately, you’ve likely seen sentiments like these being expressed. Part joke, part truth; they capture a broader cultural mood that some are calling heteropessimism.
First coined by Asa Seresin in 2019, heteropessimism doesn’t mean people actually abandon heterosexuality. Instead, it describes a performative disaffiliation from its ideals. Heteropessimists have a dislike of straight dating even while participating in it.
The Politics of Love: More Than Just 'Bad Dates'?
While heteropessimism often appears as lighthearted memes, it reflects serious political and social dynamics.
- A Growing Political-Gender Divide: Surveys show a widening ideological gap between men and women, with the former being much more likely to consider voting for the far right than the latter. That mismatch makes challenges in dating less about intimacy and chemistry and more about clashing worldviews.
- A History of Inequality: Research continues to show that women shoulder disproportionate emotional and domestic work, even in dual-income households. The result? Relationships often feel less like partnerships and more like unequal transactions.
- Dating App Burnout: Swiping culture on apps such as Tinder and Bumble can create a cycle of fatigue that some researchers call “dating burnout.”
With all this in mind, heteropessimism is not just a passing appraisal of modern dating. Instead, it represents a psychological orientation and a way of making sense of intimacy under conditions of perceived inequality and growing political strife.
This is why cultural critics see heteropessimism as more than simple cynicism. It represents a coping mechanism, where joking about “trash men” or “hopeless dating” eases the pressure of pretending that relationships are always fulfilling.
But there’s a risk, too. If complaint is all that’s offered, it can slip into resignation. Feminist theorist Sara Ahmed has argued that complaint without action can become a self-fulfilling cycle, and embodies a way of naming the problem without ever moving beyond it. That’s why some scholars caution that heteropessimism, if it stays at the level of memes and jokes, risks normalizing disappointment rather than sparking change.
How Can We Foster Hetero-Optimism?
If heteropessimism names the problem, what might a healthier—and perhaps more optimistic—path forward look like? Here are some options:
- Rewrite the Script: Straight couples don’t have to fall into traditional gendered roles. Partners might be better served approaching intimacy as a collaborative project built on equity, shared vulnerability, and mutual choice.
- Acknowledge Politics in Private Life: Political identity isn’t just about voting. It shapes values around family, gender, and lifestyle. Couples might open conversations about these divides to prevent mismatches from becoming relationship-ending shocks.
- Make Space for Optimism: Optimism doesn’t mean ignoring inequality. It means believing a relationship can evolve into a fairer, more fulfilling partnership if both parties are willing to contribute to its growth.
Heteropessimism doesn’t have to be the endpoint of evaluating your relationships. By recognizing the politics of intimacy and committing to new ways of relating, relationships can grow stronger than ever before.
Final Thoughts
Heteropessimism is more than a dating trend. As a concept, it acts as a reminder about the effects of living in such polarized times. It reflects a frustration with inequality, an exhaustion with swiping culture, and a disillusionment with political divides between men and women.
But naming the problem is only the first step in solving relationship issues. To move forward, partnerships need to be reimagined and reframed; not as doomed arrangements inevitably leading to failure, but as sites of possibility for mutual growth and flourishing. That requires emotional honesty and openness, political awareness, and the courage to build something better than the scripts we’ve inherited from past generations.
If heteropessimism is the diagnosis, then perhaps hetero-optimism—a belief in more equal, intentional, and meaningful relationships—can be the treatment to our current difficulties in dating.