They are using the same pursuasive methods outlined
in "Influence," by Robert Caldini , or "The Confidence
Game," by Maria ? " Emepror-has-no-clothes-Trump," is
the P.T. Barnum of the 21st century. It's like Professional
Wrestling. (Trump is pals with Vince McMann)
Truth is stranger then fiction and Trump is not an authentic
candidate at all. He is the Clinton's secret weapon.
In 1992, Bill Clinton was the most corrupt person to ever
seek the office. He need the help of another tempermental
tycoon, H. Ross Perot, who splintered the vote. Bill Clinton
was elected with 38% of the vote. Now, it is Hillary who is
most corrupt. "Deal Maker" Trump (His biggest deal was
when he sold his soul to Satan) agreed to help Hillary get
elected. It's a "win-win" for him because he can be the
second most powerful person in the land after an indebted
Hillary. And he doesn't have to be President, which he
never wanted to be anyway. Also, a great fringe benefit
will be that the Republican party will be vaporized like a
Belgum airline passenger. No more Senators, Congress,
or conservative Supreme Court justices.
The final Stalinist triumph. Oh, and not to mention the
racial genocide of the White Christian male, and the
sexual enslavement of the White female.

Emma Seppälä Ph.D.
5 Reasons This Election Is Nuts—and the Science Behind It
The candidates are outrageous, the rankings unexplainable. Research shows why.
Posted Mar 24, 2016

There’s no doubt this presidential race is absolutely wild. After all, everyone dislikes the leading candidate, the debates are uncivil, the candidate's statements are often outrageous, and the most liked candidates have the lowest rankings. Yet despite the apparent craziness, these phenomena are more normal than we think. There's some hard data to show why they happen.
1. Why the leading candidate is someone everyone hates
One would think that the leading candidate is also the most beloved. Yet in this case, the leading Republican candidate is someone many people love to hate—even Republicans! Yet he is doing so great! Why? As a consequence of all the animosity against him, this election is all about Trump. He dominates all of our news and social media feeds. He is getting all the attention and—in terms of psychology—there is no such thing as bad press. The mere exposure effect shows that seeing more of something can lead us to like it more. Whether we like it or not, Trump is getting far more publicity than any other candidate of either party.
2. Why negative press makes supporters like their candidate more
What about Trump backers? Shouldn't negative press change their minds? Nope. The more they hear negative press, the more they like him, too, due to the backfire effect. When someone gives us evidence that we are wrong about a strong opinion we hold, it can actually make us feel stronger about it. They also fall prey to confirmation bias—looking for all the evidence that confirms their opinion, ignoring any contradictory evidence. That’s what makes conversations about politics so difficult. Research shows that, when it comes to politics, people often feel the same way they do towards a sports team. It's more about affiliation and group membership than ideology.
3. Why being wildly uncivil works in your favor (right now)
One would expect that everyone wants a president that acts dignified. Not so fast. In this election, the more unpresidential people act, the better they end up doing. It wasn’t just Trump talking about the size of his family jewels—by all accounts, the debates (the Republican ones in particular) were often uncivil and even undignified. Yet the more uncivil the candidates’ language becomes, the higher their approval rankings. Why? The reason may be that we're in a time of crisis. Emerging research by David Clementson at Ohio State suggests that when candidates are highly emotional (angry, for example), it works in their favor during times of crisis. So Trump’s fear-inducing tweets after the Brussels attack—that we now live in a “different world”—works in his favor because the world is in a time of terrorist crisis.
Hillary, as a woman, however, has to be very careful to regulate her emotions. She can’t show too much emotion, especially anger (she received strong backlash for showing anger after her recent win). Research shows that female politicians are less influential when they show anger (as opposed to when men do), so she has to carefully regulate her emotions when she speaks as opposed to Bernie, who can freely express his feelings.
4. Highlighting the negative improves your rankings
Sensationalist talk is also a way to manipulate our emotions. Research shows triggering anxiety is a great way for politicians to win us over to their ideas. Trump and Cruz, by talking about the need to blast the Middle East, build a wall around Mexico, and police Muslim populations in America to stop terrorism, for example, are play on our fear and anger. And it works. Our brain focuses on the negative. By bringing up terrorists, immigrants that are supposedly taking our jobs, or by bringing up the other party or other candidate’s shortcomings, they make us join their side by making us afraid.
Another way to win supporters over to their side is to prey on our strong need to belong to a group and identity. By pitting us against others—terrorists, immigrants, the other party—they make us feel like it’s us against them. Ironically, this brings about a sense of in-group togetherness, connection, and belonging, which research shows we all long for, and gives us a feeling of security. Bringing up another candidate’s shortcomings (no pun intended) is another way to try and win people over to your team.
5. Why the most “liked” candidates have the lowest approval rankings
You would think that, logically, the most liked candidates (Sanders and Kasich, according to a recent Gallup survey) also have the highest approval rankings. Moreover, they are more humble. Great American presidents, like Lincoln for example, were known for their humility. Not so in this election, where we are seeing that arrogance wins.
Here’s why: Research shows we have the misconception that being confident, showing high self-esteem, dominance and authority makes people good leaders. There's no doubt that confidence can make a better leader, research shows, but only if the leader has the ability to get along well with people. If confidence is coupled with dominance and an authoritarian style, this collection of traits is often a sign of narcissism. Narcissists are fantastic on-stage when they’re in the spotlight: They are magnetic, powerful speakers. The problem comes in the long run. Narcissists are often risk-takers with big blind-spots—a dangerous combination. They don't work well with others because they are not trustworthy, and have an overconfidence that leads them to make mistakes.
Research shows that in the long-term, the best leaders are those who have high emotional intelligence and a values-driven approach: humility, compassion, trustworthiness, and empathy. These traits help them build good relationships. They take feedback and input from others intelligently, are good decision-makers, are highly likable, and inspire deep loyalty because of their values. They forge strong alliances and are supported by their followers over the long run.

For more about the psychology of leadership and happiness, see The Happiness Track: How to Apply the Psychology of Happiness to Accelerate Your Success.