Time for something completely different. This is a list that appears in an essay by Jorge Luis Borges, “The Analytical Language of John Wilkins,” in Borges: Selected Non-Fictions.

I have no idea why I love this passage so much, but I do.

These ambiguities, redundancies and deficiencies recall those attributed by Dr. Franz Kuhn attributes to a certain Chinese encyclopedia entitled Heavenly Emporium of Benevolent Knowledge. In its distant pages it is written that animals are divided into:

(a) those belonging to the emperor;

(b) embalmed ones;

(c) those that are trained;

(d) suckling pigs;

(e) mermaids;

(f) fabulous ones;

(g) stray dogs;

(h) those that are included in this classification;

(i) those that tremble as if they were mad;

(j) innumerable ones;

(k) those drawn with a very fine camel’s-hair brush;

(l) etcetera;

(m) those that have just broken the watcher pitcher;

(n) those that at a distance resemble flies.

How I love this list. My favorite: “those that are included in this classification.” Also “mermaids.” What do you think…do you find this list thought-provoking, intriguing, or nonsensical?

Thinking about this passage and this list is making me want to go re-read Borges. Where’s my copy of Labyrinths?


Also ...

  • Want to see a copy of my Resolutions Chart, to help you think about your own happiness  project? Request one here.

Recent Posts in The Happiness Project

Have You Ever Felt a “Call” to Do a Certain Kind of Work?

In some ways, a call is wonderful. It’s clear. It’s urgent. It’s fulfilling.

Why It’s a Bad Idea to “Interview for Pain”

"Don't nurture resentments, and don’t hold on to ancient history."

Secret of Adulthood: Lose Yourself to Find Yourself.

From Further Secrets of Adulthood.

How Does a Rebel Change Habits?

One Rebel's Clever Solution.

Something Becomes Important Because We’re Paying Attention

This kind of epiphany happened to me recently, when I was in London