Serious questions have surfaced about the competence, procedure, and secrecy of the task force charged with the responsibility of updating the DSM, the world's diagnostic bible of mental disorders. Perhaps surprisingly, the two most vocal skeptics are former editors of the manual. In one open letter, they chide the leaders of the American Psychiatric Association for creating a "rigid fortress mentality." The critics, Robert Spitzer and Allen Frances, also insist, more damagingly, that the organization needs to "save DSM-V from itself.

I write about the dust-up in Slate today. The article, "The Diagnostic Madness of DSM-V" appears here.

Recent Posts in Side Effects

“Side Effects” Turns A Million

Thanks to all my readers.

New DSM-5 Disorder Spurs FDA Drug Approval, Expanded Market

Drug-maker’s challenge: “increase the numbers of patients diagnosed.”

Personalized Genomics, Data-Hoarding, and Drug Companies

How do genetic-testing companies make money?

Tackling Childhood Obesity: What Works, What Doesn’t

How childhood obesity became a global problem.

Ebola, a Promising Serum, and Kent Brantly’s Recovery

Is Kent Brantly’s recovery owing to medicine, religious faith, or both?

The Business of Medicalizing Infancy

Why the age thresholds for childhood disorders keep falling.