This post is in response to Do Alcoholics Deserve Liver Transplants? by Phil Newton

I have received a number of comments on my original post and I want to make sure I'm absolutely clear. My intention was to use the issue of liver transplantation to highlight how some people view alcoholics as being at fault for their alcoholism.


There are multiple issues surrounding organ donation. One of these is that the clinical team performing the transplant has to determine whether the person receiving the organ is fit and healthy enough to receive it. Having a current diagnosis of alcoholism will obviously impact that assessment. In the oft-cited hypothetical situation where a surgeon has to choose between giving a liver to an alcoholic vs a non-alcoholic patient, that surgeon may well conclude that, due to a likelihood of further alcohol abuse, the alcoholic will not benefit as much from the liver as the non-alcoholic. This clinical assessment is not the issue for me, it makes perfect sense.

My concern is the notion, highlighted in the quotes in my original post and in the subsequent published comment, that alcoholics do not deserve a liver transplant because them being an alcoholic is somehow their fault. Non-alcoholics chose whether or not to drink, alcoholics do not, they have completely lost control over this "choice". It may once have been a choice, but by very definition of them being alcoholic, it no longer is.

About the Author

Phil Newton

Phil Newton, Ph.D., is the Head of Learning and Teaching for the College of Medicine at Swansea University.

You are reading

From Mouse to Man

What are Learning Styles?

Should educators be using them?

Is educational research finally having an Impact?

Is the science of education research finally getting some recognition?

New study claims it is easy to 'fake' ADHD

Claims that '5 mins with Google' is all it takes