Skip to main content

Verified by Psychology Today

Relationships

Mixed Signals on Social Life, Relationships, and Loneliness

We should let people live how they choose, but watch for when they need help.

It seems we get a lot of mixed signals about our social lives these days:

► On the one hand, we’re told that we are essentially social beings, that we need other people in our lives, especially a fair number of close friends.

► But on the other hand, we’re told that we don’t need another person to complete us, that we should be happy with ourselves without depending on anyone else to fulfill us—especially not a romantic partner.

So which is it? We need other people to be whole, but then again we should be content with ourselves alone?

Pexels CC0
Source: Pexels CC0

Admittedly, there is a middle ground here: being social and valuing relationships with other people does not imply romantic, monogamous relationships. It could mean any type of friendship with all sorts of people—and any number of people.

Nonetheless, I think there is a tension here. We need other people to make us whole, but not romantic partners. But why draw the line there? (Why draw it anywhere, for that matter?)

What if some people feel incomplete without someone to love? Many people feel incomplete without close friends, and few would question this. If you don’t have enough close friends, then many would say that you’re missing out on something essential to a full life. But dare to say that you need a romantic partner to feel whole, and you’ll likely be accused of being overly dependent and not self-actualized (for which, apparently, you do need close friends).

Maybe what we need is for people to stop telling us what we need to do to be happy or fulfilled, and instead encourage people to figure it out for themselves, giving them the most opportunities possible to find their own way of living.

Some people have many friends, others have few, but they may all be happy. Some people like being single, others prefer being coupled, and still others enjoy other kinds of relationship structures, including open relationships and polyamory. None of these guarantees happiness all the time, of course, but all else the same, people will generally be happier if they’re not forced into social arrangements in which they’re uncomfortable over time, whether by legal and social barriers.

—————

Before we say “let a thousand flowers bloom” and walk away, there are some problems with this approach. An important one is that finding the social arrangement that makes you happy is not necessarily easy. For example, the popularity of dating websites is one sign that many people are trying different ways to find another person to satisfy their emotional needs. Also, many people face significant resistance to seeking out different forms of relationships, resistance that threatens their bonds with family, friends, and community, at the same time they are trying to find deeper fulfillment in their romantic and sexual lives.

An even more serious example is the widely reported and worsening scourge of loneliness, in which people do need other people in their lives but for some reason don’t have them. While those who want to meet a romantic or sexual partner have plenty of online and real-life resources to help them, people who suffer from deeper forms of loneliness—especially when complicated by depression—don’t always have the ability or opportunity to tell anyone. (And that’s assuming they’re aware of it themselves.) Because of this, loneliness is self-perpetuating: if you’re lonely but you don’t have anybody to reach out to, you become even lonelier. Research into the causes and incidence of loneliness is valuable because it allows people who can offer help to find people who are likely in need of it.

Pexels, CC0
Source: Pexels, CC0

Giving people the opportunity to find the help they need is not always enough, because it assumes they have the means to take advantage of the help that’s available—and the problem sometimes lies in being uncomfortable interacting with other people even in a minimal way. Recognizing this requires us to walk a fine line between being respectful of people’s choices (even if we disagree with them) and taking positive and sometimes intrusive steps to help them make better ones (even if they disagree with them).

This is yet another example of the conflict between respect and care that lies at the center of so many ethical and political debates. Usually, I lean towards the side of respect, based on individuals’ better (if imperfect) knowledge of their own interests. But as I explained above, the nature of loneliness (and any underlying mental health issues) prevents sufferers from taking steps on their own, or even asking for help. This may require us to take cautious and measured steps to inquire into their well-being, without judging their interests or the choices they make to pursue them.

The important thing to remember is that, when we reach out to help people who need it, we need to be mindful of what they really want, not what we want for them. As Immanuel Kant wrote in The Metaphysics of Morals, “I cannot do good to anyone in accordance with my concepts of happiness, think­ing to benefit him by forcing a gift upon him; rather, I can benefit him only in accordance with his concepts of happiness.” If we are going to express care, it should be done with the maximal degree of respect possible, making sure the help we offer aligns with what the other person truly wants or needs.

Look at it this way: just because a wheel isn’t squeaky doesn’t mean it’s OK. Sometimes it means the wheel has fallen apart and needs help pulling itself back together. We just need to be careful to help put it back together the way it wants, not the way that seems best to us.

Not everyone that seems lonely is lonely, and not everyone that is lonely wants or needs help, but those who are lonely and do want help should be encouraged to seek it out. The problem is that these are exactly the people who are the least likely to say they need help, so sometimes we have to ask. But we have to be prepared to respect the answer we get, even if we think we have a better one.

———————————————

For more on respect versus care, see my book The Illusion of Well-Being, especially chapters 3 and 4.

Again, I thank my good friend Lauren Hale for comments on early versions of this post.

For more of my posts on relationships and other topics, see this categorized list at my website.

Feel free to visit my website (http://www.profmdwhite.com) and follow me on Twitter (@profmdwhite).

advertisement
More from Mark D. White Ph.D.
More from Psychology Today