In the wake of marijuana legalization laws in Colorado and Washington, the University of Oregon School of Law recently hosted a drug policy symposium. Many legislators attended; and there was a feeling among the participants that Oregon could well be the next state to take similar action.
The debate over New York City’s 16-ounce limit on sugary drinks has contrasted the need to combat the obesity epidemic with the need to protect individual rights. The regulation raises the same kinds of issues as the debate over legalizing marijuana and downsizing or ending the War on Drugs.
Many people argue as follows, “How can you say that the human species has no biological races, when blacks get sickle cell anemia and whites don’t?” The mistaken reasoning goes as follows: skin color is inherited, and sickle cell disease is inherited, therefore sickle cell disease is caused by race. Therefore races exist.
Rather than attacking drugs as the cause of crime, corruption, and disease, policy should be aimed at attacking the black market created by the War on Drugs, because it is the black market that causes crime, corruption, and disease.
Not Thomas Jefferson. Me. Years ago, when I was living in Brazil, I was standing on line and the woman behind me said, “Shut up, Jefferson!” (“Cale a boca, Jeferson!”) It turned out that she was speaking to her three-year-old son.
The brutal rape and murder of a woman in India has led to widespread protests in that country. How might population trends help to explain Indian attitudes toward rape? Why didn’t such protests occur years ago?
As a young psychologist, I married an anthropologist who studies Brazilian Indians and went off with her and our daughter to live in Brazil. There I became fascinated by the very different way Brazilians think about race—leading ultimately to my latest book, The Myth of Race.
Alcohol prohibition came to an end as a result of the Great Depression, and it is now beginning to look as if marijuana prohibition will come to an end as a result of the Great Recession. The parallels are striking, and they offer suggestions for the way forward.
In 1921 Lewis Terman, developer of the Stanford-Binet IQ test, began research on more than 1,500 bright 10-year-old Californians. Generations of researchers have continued work on the project and have discovered psychological predictors of a long life.
On Valentine’s Day, HBO presented the documentary The Loving Story. The film tells about an interracial couple in Virginia in 1958 jailed for violating the state’s anti-miscegenation law. Their case eventually led to the Supreme Court’s 1967 unanimous decision in Loving v. Virginia declaring laws against intermarriage unconstitutional.
Why is it that so-called racial features are variable (e.g., skin color varies from dark to light) rather than fixed (e.g., the belief that one biological race has dark skin color and another has light skin color)?
In an amazing act of self-restraint, Ken Burns avoids all mention of the War On Drugs during his excellent three-part PBS series Prohibition. The parallels are, however, so exact, so numerous, and so painful that pointing them out feels like belaboring the obvious.
Understanding race and culture helps us answer the question "Who am I?" and has implications for everything from personal relationships and therapy to social policy, international relations, and beyond.