In chapters 6 and 9 of my academic and trade books respectively (The Evolutionary Bases of Consumption and The Consuming Instinct: What Juicy Burgers, Ferraris, Pornography, and Gift Giving Reveal About Human Nature), I discuss the evolutionary roots of various dark side consumption phenomena including pathological gambling, eating disorders, excessive sun tanning (see my earlier post on this topic here), pornographic addiction, and compulsive buying.  I demonstrate how each of these behavioral disorders constitutes a misfiring of an otherwise adaptive pursuit.  This line of evolutionary-based thinking is applicable to a wide range of psychiatric disorders (see for example the book Darwinian Psychiatry authored by Michael McGuire and Alfonso Troisi).  In today’s post, I’d like to briefly discuss how an evolutionary lens informs our understanding of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD).

In 2006, I authored a commentary in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (Saad, 2006a) and an article in Medical Hypotheses (Saad, 2006b) in which I argued that many instantiations of OCD assort along universally sex-specific manners.  In other words, some obsessions and compulsions are more likely to afflict a given sex precisely because these map onto sex-specific concerns of evolutionary import.  I was providing a more granular explanation of more general evolutionary accounts of OCD (cf. Rapoport and Fiske, 1998; Abed & De Pauw, 1999; and Szechtman & Woody, 2004).  Take for example ruminative thinking, a form of OCD.  The specific contents of some culprit intrusive thoughts are much more likely to afflict one of the two sexes because they cater to Darwinian-based insecurities that are sex-specific (e.g., ruminative thoughts associated with the prospective loss of social status will be much more frequent among men). Similarly, obsessions and compulsions linked to the safety of one’s offspring are more frequent in women perhaps in part because of the evolutionary realities associated with parental investment theory and paternity uncertainty.  Finally, contamination fears are more prevalent among women, and these tend to wax and wane across the menstrual cycle in ways that are likely rooted in adaptive processes (e.g., the differential desire to avoid food pathogens as a function of a woman’s reproductive status; the shifting levels of disgust across the menstrual cycle).  See Saad (2006b) for relevant references.

Bottom line:  Evolutionary theorists have argued that OCD is the hyper-activation of warning systems that evolved to flag us against a wide range of environmental threats (physical, pathogenic, social, etc.).  In my work, I have argued that the symptomatology of OCD exhibits several universal sex-specific patterns that speak to sex-specific evolutionary threats.  To know whether an instantiation of OCD will garner a sex difference, one must gauge whether evolutionarily speaking the perceived threat was equally relevant to both sexes or not.

Please consider following me on Twitter

Source for Image:

Recent Posts in Homo Consumericus

Equality Under the Law ≠ Equality of Outcomes

All individuals are not created equal

Is Atheism Just Another Religion?

Altering the meaning of words for maximal persuasion

Why Do Individuals Enlist with ISIS? Ask Russell Brand!

It’s ‘progressive’ to self-loathe one’s Western culture

How Do We Know If a Religion Is Peaceful?

Conducting a content analysis on religious texts: Oh the peace!

Sex Differences in Educational Attainment

Which of the two sexes is more educated in the United States?

Which Ten Historical Figures Would You Invite For Dinner?

Einstein and Darwin are the most popular dinner guests