APA Fails to Sanction Psychologist in GTMO Torture Case

Because Dr. Leso’s documented actions so clearly violated psychological ethics and because this abuse of psychological expertise was undertaken at the behest of governmental authorities, this case represents a landmark test of the independence of psychological ethics and professional standards from governmental and institutional pressures.

Psychologist Group Raises Concerns about APA Ethics Decision

A letter from Psychologists for Social Responsibility raises key questions about the American Psychological Association's disturbing decision to close an ethics complaint against Guantanamo military psychologist John Leso without formal charges, despite his documented involvement in brutal detention and interrogation operations.

Psychology's Newest Joke: Not Very Funny

Yet again, on matters of torture, ethics, and accountability the world's largest psychological association has taken a step in the wrong direction.

A Psychologist’s Deceptions about Prison Abuse in California

The head of California’s prison system, where a hunger strike is now entering its ninth week, is a psychologist with over thirty years of training and experience. But despite belonging to a profession that prioritizes the promotion of human welfare, Dr. Jeffrey Beard has chosen to repeatedly misrepresent the seriousness and legitimacy of the striking prisoners’ concerns.

Hawaiian Mind Games: APA Fiddles While Psychology Burns

Psychologists designed, implemented, supervised, and provided ethical cover for CIA and U.S. military “war on terror” abuses. As a result, the APA has faced repeated calls to take action to prevent future abuses by members of the profession. But APA leaders have responded with empty talk and feeble resolutions. Last week’s vacuous exercise was the latest example.

A Psychologist's Guantanamo Nightmare

This glimpse into an imagined dark future reflects the failure of psychology’s leaders to adequately defend the profession’s ethical commitment to doing no harm. What has already happened cannot be changed, but there are alternative paths forward. The most promising one for my profession requires dedicated and unflinching efforts directed toward accountability and reform.

Psychologists and Torture: Accountability Still Awaits

The Constitution Project's Task Force Report on Detainee Treatment documents that psychologists were involved in the design and implementation of interrogation techniques that constituted torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. A serious and thorough accounting is long overdue and indispensable in order to restore the ethical foundations of the profession.

Guantánamo and the APA: Where Accountability Goes to Die

Dozens of prisoners at Guantánamo – the vast majority innocent of any terrorist involvement – are now starving themselves to death. Many have suffered not only from indefinite detention, they have also been the victims of horrific physical and psychological abuse often rising to the level of torture – at the hands of individuals who have never been held accountable.

PsySR Open Letter on Guantanamo Hunger Strike

Psychologists for Social Responsibility has released an Open Letter sent to Secretary of Defense Hagel expressing deep concern about the ongoing hunger strike at Guantánamo Bay. With no end in sight, the letter calls for immediate action to address this increasingly desperate situation in a manner that respects the concerns and autonomy of the detainees.

Neuroscience, Special Forces, and Ethics at Yale

Controversy recently erupted over a proposed DoD-funded center for operational neuroscience that would have brought U.S. Special Forces to Yale for interview training. Many questions remain unanswered, and the episode brings much needed attention to the morally fraught and murky terrain where partnerships between university researchers and national security agencies lie.

Psychological Ethics & National Security: Letter to the APA

Yesterday the Coalition for an Ethical Psychology sent a letter to the American Psychological Association’s governing body. Given psychologists’ involvement in abusive and torturous interrogations at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere, the letter offers a set of recommendations for establishing a firm ethical foundation for psychologists working in national security settings.

Torturing the Truth and Whitewashing Hell

The controversy continues regarding retired military psychologist Larry James, who is seeking an executive director position at the University of Missouri. At last week's open forum on the campus, he responded to questions about his role in the detention conditions and interrogation practices at the Guantanamo Bay Detention Center. His answers deserve closer examination.

More Questions About Torture, and the University

A finalist for a university executive director position is a former senior military psychologist who was involved in the interrogation and detention operations at both Abu Ghraib prison and the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay.

The Torture Debate Echoes: An Army Psychologist’s Job Search

A controversial finalist in the search for a new division executive director at the University of Missouri's College of Education is a retired Army colonel and military psychologist who held positions of authority during stints at the infamous Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility in Cuba.

Confronting the Violence That Betrays Young Lives

We can best honor the lives lost in Newtown – precious young children and the courageous adults who sought to protect them – by working together with determination to reform our gun laws and to address all forms of violence against children at home and abroad.

Ethics First: A Response to Our Critics

Greater awareness, engagement, and guidance are urgently needed in order to prevent ethically fraught aspects of national security psychology from undermining our profession’s most noble aspirations.

Open Letter: The Need for Ethical Accountability in APA

In this open letter, two psychologists call upon the president of the American Psychological Association to make sure that psychologists implicated in torture and prisoner abuse are held accountable by the APA's Ethics Office.

Dr. Frankenstein and the APA's Decade of Monstrosities

There is no shortage of arenas where the tale of Frankenstein – of science unmoored from values, of ambition unrestrained by conscience – resonates today. One that stands out for many psychologists is the APA’s ongoing embrace of “war on terror” opportunities that have placed U.S. psychologists at the center of coercive interrogations and other human rights abuses.

The Army’s Flawed Resilience-Training Study: A Call for Retraction

Ten years of continuous war, characterized by multiple deployments, elusive guerilla adversaries, and occupied populations seemingly more tilted toward resentment than gratitude, have taken a significant toll on US troops.

The Dark Side of “Comprehensive Soldier Fitness”

Why is the world's largest organization of psychologists so aggressively promoting a new, massive, and untested military program? The APA's enthusiasm for mandatory "resilience training" for all U.S. soldiers is troubling on many counts.

Pages