I've been long interested in the evolution of group living and sociality in nonhuman animals (animals), so a recent report of the advantages of group swimming by sperm caught my eye and provided a nice respite from writing about what I usually write about. 

The benefits of cooperation by sperm is that they travel straighter, not faster

Harvard University evolutionary biologist Heidi Fisher and her colleagues studied group formation and the path that the swimming sperm of two closely related species of mice take when traveling alone and when traveling in groups. They reported their very interesting results in a research paper titled "The dynamics of sperm cooperation in a competitive environment." Their essay is only available to subscribers to the journal, and many different summaries can be found here.

The results of this research project are very interesting and were related to the type of mating system shown by the different species of mice they studied. To wit, Dr. Fisher and her research team discovered that when they squirted the sperm of two different species of mice onto a microscope slide and then videotaped what they did, the sperm of monogamous beach mice when compared to the sperm of promiscuous North American deer mice tended to swim alone, and that groups of sperm (up to around seven) of the deer mice traveled in straighter trajectories, but not faster, than solo sperm of the same species. So, although cooperation among sperm is rare, forming groups in the promiscuous species seems to be advantageous as an adaptation to potential competition among individual sperm so that they arrive at their destination faster than lone sperm. 

While we need much more research in this area, it is very interesting that cooperation and group living by sperm is an evolved adaptation related to the mating system of the different species. Who would have thought that sperm show the same sorts of adaptations as do many group living animals?

Marc Bekoff's latest books are Jasper's story: Saving moon bears (with Jill Robinson; see also), Ignoring nature no more: The case for compassionate conservation (see also)and Why dogs hump and bees get depressed (see also). Rewilding our hearts: Building pathways of compassion and coexistence will be published fall 2014. (marcbekoff.com@MarcBekoff

Recent Posts in Animal Emotions

Animal "Euthanasia" Is Often Slaughter: Consider Kangaroos

KIlling baby kangaroos to learn how to kill them "humanely" isn't euthanasia

Cats: Owners Say Let Them be Predators and Kill Wildlife

A new study shows people are okay with free-running cats killing wildlife

Your Brain and Health in Nature: Rewilding Is Good For Us

Two studies show how walking in nature changes the brain and the value of trees

Why Science Does Not Need Female or Male Mice

A New York Times editorial “Why Science Needs Female Mice” needs close scrutiny

Dogs' Noses Know More Than Doctors About Cancer Detection

Dogs are highly accurate sniffing out various diseases and outperform humans

A Tale of Two Brains: Are Two Really Better than One?

A recent study of brain-melding raises many important questions about ethics