I'm taking the liberty of posting this as a new and very brief essay to follow up on one that I wrote last week about this panda birth because this tragic death of the young panda (see also for additional coverage) must not be lost in the shuffle and barrage of emails people receive. In my previous essay I argued that we don't need more baby pandas. Despite some interesting comments to my essay and personal emails I maintain this position. 

Do animals grieve, some wonder? Of course they do. To quote from the article above, "Panda keepers and volunteers 'heard a distress vocalization from the mother, Mei Xiang, at 9:17 am and notified the veterinarian staff immediately,' zoo officials said." There were no outward signs of trauma.

Let's all light a candle for this most tragic, and some might argue, avoidable loss, avoidable in the sense that the mother panda didn't have to be artificially inseminated to make more babies. People have occasionally offered that babies often die in the wild and it's "natural", however, there's nothing at all natural about this tragic situation in which a female panda was kept in a cage and forced to have a baby. 

Recent Posts in Animal Emotions

Animal "Euthanasia" Is Often Slaughter: Consider Kangaroos

KIlling baby kangaroos to learn how to kill them "humanely" isn't euthanasia

Cats: Owners Say Let Them be Predators and Kill Wildlife

A new study shows people are okay with free-running cats killing wildlife

Your Brain and Health in Nature: Rewilding Is Good For Us

Two studies show how walking in nature changes the brain and the value of trees

Why Science Does Not Need Female or Male Mice

A New York Times editorial “Why Science Needs Female Mice” needs close scrutiny

Dogs' Noses Know More Than Doctors About Cancer Detection

Dogs are highly accurate sniffing out various diseases and outperform humans

A Tale of Two Brains: Are Two Really Better than One?

A recent study of brain-melding raises many important questions about ethics