I'm taking the liberty of posting this as a new and very brief essay to follow up on one that I wrote last week about this panda birth because this tragic death of the young panda (see also for additional coverage) must not be lost in the shuffle and barrage of emails people receive. In my previous essay I argued that we don't need more baby pandas. Despite some interesting comments to my essay and personal emails I maintain this position. 

Do animals grieve, some wonder? Of course they do. To quote from the article above, "Panda keepers and volunteers 'heard a distress vocalization from the mother, Mei Xiang, at 9:17 am and notified the veterinarian staff immediately,' zoo officials said." There were no outward signs of trauma.

Let's all light a candle for this most tragic, and some might argue, avoidable loss, avoidable in the sense that the mother panda didn't have to be artificially inseminated to make more babies. People have occasionally offered that babies often die in the wild and it's "natural", however, there's nothing at all natural about this tragic situation in which a female panda was kept in a cage and forced to have a baby. 

Recent Posts in Animal Emotions

Why SeaWorld Can’t Float: Censorship and Business Ethics

Watch a critical presentation that SeaWorld asked not to be recorded

Entangled Empathy: How to Improve Human-Animal Relationships

A recent book sets out a new ethic for our relationships with other animals.

Wicked Tuna: NGS Supports Animal Abuse and Poor Conservation

This series continues on showing incredible torment and torture of sentient tuna

New Conservation Science is Misguided and Too Much About Us

The view that conservation should focus on human self-interests is wrong-minded

Animals in Emergencies: Lessons from the Christchurch Quakes

Annie Potts and Donelle Gadenne's book is a must read for future animal rescues.

Killing Canadian Wolves Violated Accepted Welfare Guidelines

Scientists show why killing Canadian wolves should never have been allowed.