In many previous essays I've written about the emotional lives of chimpanzees (and other nonhuman animals) and the work that many are doing to end the use of these amazing beings in invasive research and to protect their dwindling natural habitiats. Some people think that people who work for these ends are "radicals" but this is not the case at all. It's not radical to care about animals and their homes. 

Now, a major scientific magazine has called for a ban on the use of chimpanzees in invasive research. The editors of Scientific American have stepped forth and written "In our view, the time has come to end biomedical experimentation on chimpanzees." They also note that current regulations do not adequately protect chimpanzees: "The Animal Welfare Act affords chimps some protection. But clearly more is needed. To develop and enforce tighter regulations, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which enforces the Animal Welfare Act, should establish an ethics committee specifically for biomedical research on chimps. The committee would need to include not just medical researchers but also bioethicists and representatives from animal welfare groups. Such measures would no doubt make medical testing on chimps even more expensive than it already is. Yet if human lives are going to benefit from research on our primate cousins, it is incumbent on us to minimize their suffering, provide them with an acceptable quality of life-and develop techniques that hasten the day when all of Bobby's fellow chimps can join him in retirement." Bobby is a chimpanzee who was used in scientific research for years on end and lived alone in a cramped and barren cage. He eventually became severely depressed and self-destructive. It has been well-established that chimpanzees suffer from a wide variety of mood disorders including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Other animals - tens of milliions in fact - also are not adequately protected by the curent Federal Animal Welfare Act. They too need far more protection than they are afforded. 

The editors of Scientific American are not "radicals" and indeed, they are not alone in calling for a ban on the use of chimpanzees in invasive research. In an essay in the New York Times Roscoe G. Bartlett, a republican representative from Maryland and former physiologist at the Navy's School of Aviation Medicine concluded "Americans can longer justifying confining these magnificent and innocent animals to traumatic and invasive research and life imprisonment."

As time goes on, support for ending the use of chimpanzees in invasive research is growing. Let's keep the pressure on to make this a reality. And let's also remember the millions of other animals, sentient or not, who are not protected from extreme abuse. 

Recent Posts in Animal Emotions

Thousands of Cormorants to be Killed: There Will be Blood

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers plans to kill 11,000 and destroy 26,000 nests

Peter Singer Argues for "Effective Altruism" in His New Book

"The Most Good You Can Do" is a very thoughtful book about charitable giving.

Beneath the Surface: SeaWorld Insider Goes Beyond Blackfish

Former senior orca trainer John Hargrove's new book will blow your mind—or not

Elephant Don: The Politics of a Pachyderm Posse

Caitlin O'Connell's new book is an outstanding up close and personal work of art

Whipping Horses: A Critical Analysis Shows It is Unwarranted

The British Horseracing Authority's conclusion that whipping is okay is flawed

Scalding Live Chickens Is an Accepted Brutal Business Model

Nicholas Kristof's New York Times "To Kill a Chicken" is a must read