Negative reactivity between partners is what keeps couples making the same mistakes over and over. That's when one cannot have a negative emotion without the other responding defensively. The principle holds even if the negative emotion is not expressed - one sulks, the other reacts.

From outside this interactive dynamic, it's easy to come up with pop-psychology answers about better communication or boundary-setting. Within the dynamic, it feels more like a struggle for autonomy and the self. It feels that way because they have so much emotional power over each other that neither is autonomous in their choice of thoughts, feelings, or behavior; they just react to each other.

Reversing negative reactivity starts with questions that are more philosophical than psychological. You have to decide what kind of a person and partner you want to be. The couples who come to our boot camps must answer the following questions as a starting point:

Do you want to be driven by your ego?
Or motivated by your deepest values?

Do you want your partner submit to what you want?
Or to willingly cooperate with you?

Do you want to value your partner?
Or devalue your partner?

In your intimate relationship, which do you most want, power or value?

Is your resentment or anger helping you be the person, parent, and intimate partner you most want to be?

What is more important to you:
Your deepest values, emotional well being, and the emotional well being of the people you love? Or the things you resent?

CompassionPower

Recent Posts in Anger in the Age of Entitlement

In Marriage, It's Compassion or Resentment

The only middle ground is numbness

Anger Problems

Using Anger to Numb or Avoid Pain

Why It's So Easy to Hurt the Ones We Love

It's all about perception, and too often we see ourselves in funhouse mirrors.

What Drives Emotional Abuse in Relationships

A look inside lives spent walking on eggshells.

Anger Management Failures about "Healthy" Anger

Don’t Trust Fast-Food Psychology about Healthy Anything