Social Media
Should You Vent Through Emotional Selfies on Social Media?
The risks of oversharing emotional vulnerability online. Discernment matters.
Updated November 13, 2024 Reviewed by Lybi Ma
In an era where social media is a default platform for sharing, the trend of posting emotionally venting selfies has gained popularity. These posts—photos paired with captions revealing deep emotional struggles—offer a way to seek connection, validation, or catharsis. While they can provide temporary relief, posting one’s most vulnerable moments for public consumption comes with significant risks.
Not everyone is entitled to witness our most vulnerable emotions. Discernment in choosing when, how, and with whom we share our feelings is an act of self-care and self-respect. Exercising this discernment not only protects our emotional well-being but also signals to others that we value ourselves, setting the tone for how we expect to be treated.
The Risks of Oversharing Emotional Vulnerability
1. Misjudgment and Misinterpretation
Once a post is online, it is open to interpretation, judgment, and even ridicule. Social media audiences often lack the context or empathy necessary to fully understand someone’s emotional state. Research by Derks and colleagues (2008) on digital communication highlights how tone and intent are often lost in online settings, increasing the risk of misunderstanding. Sharing emotional struggles with the wrong audience can lead to dismissive or hurtful responses, exacerbating feelings of isolation.
2. Eroding Self-Respect
Frequent public displays of vulnerability can dilute the value of intimate emotional expression. Vulnerability, as Brené Brown (2012) argues, is a powerful tool for connection but requires a safe and trusted environment. Sharing these moments indiscriminately risks signaling a lack of boundaries, which can invite others to treat us without the respect and care we deserve. When we practice discernment—choosing to share our emotions with people who have earned our trust—we reinforce our self-worth. This act of selective sharing communicates that our deepest feelings are not for public consumption but are instead reserved for those who can honor them.
3. Dependence on External Validation
Posting emotional content often garners immediate feedback in the form of likes and comments. While this can feel reassuring, over-reliance on external validation can create a cycle where self-worth becomes tied to online reactions. A study by Andreassen and colleagues (2012) found that individuals who depend on social media for affirmation are more likely to experience anxiety and decreased self-esteem when feedback is absent or negative. True self-care involves building internal resilience rather than outsourcing emotional support to a largely impersonal audience.
4. Unintended Consequences for Relationships
Publicly sharing vulnerable moments may unintentionally strain personal relationships. Friends and family who see emotional posts online might feel uncomfortable, and unsure whether or how to respond. According to Dunbar’s (1998) theory of social relationships, emotional reciprocity is crucial for maintaining bonds. Sharing deep emotions broadly on social media, rather than in private conversations, may undermine this reciprocity and leave close connections feeling overlooked.
The Power of Discernment in Emotional Sharing
1. Self-Care Through Selective Vulnerability
Sharing vulnerable emotions requires a supportive and empathetic audience. Discernment allows us to prioritize safe environments where our emotions will be respected and valued. Choosing trusted individuals for emotional disclosure aligns with principles of self-care and fosters authentic connections. Research by Sprecher and Hendrick (2004) on self-disclosure in relationships emphasizes that trust and reciprocity are foundational for meaningful connections. By reserving our vulnerable moments for trusted confidants, we safeguard our emotional well-being and deepen those relationships.
2. Modeling Self-Respect
When we demonstrate discernment in sharing, we set clear boundaries that signal to others how we expect to be treated. This communicates that our emotions are valuable and not for exploitation or casual commentary. Boundaries act as a form of emotional armor, protecting us from potential harm while allowing for genuine support where it is most effective.
3. Prioritizing Privacy for Emotional Processing
Before sharing a venting selfie, consider whether the act of posting serves your emotional needs or seeks validation. Journaling, therapy, or talking with a close friend can offer a more constructive outlet for processing emotions. These methods provide opportunities for deeper reflection and growth without the risks of oversharing.
When Social Media Becomes a Tool for Healing
This isn’t to say that social media is an inherently inappropriate space for emotional sharing. It can foster a sense of solidarity and encourage others to seek help. For example, research by Rains and Wright (2016) found that individuals who used social media for health-related support reported increased feelings of connectedness and reduced stigma.
However, the key is intentionality. Ask yourself:
- Is this the right platform for this emotional moment?
- Who is my intended audience, and can they offer the support I need?
- Would I feel equally supported if I shared this privately with someone I trust?
Remember, not everyone is entitled to witness your struggles. By choosing the right audience and outlet, you ensure your emotions are met with the care and understanding they deserve, fostering growth and resilience in a way that strengthens your mental and emotional health.
Copyright 2024 Tara Well, PhD
References
1. Andreassen, C. S., Torsheim, T., Brunborg, G. S., & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale. Psychological Reports.
2. Brown, B. (2012). Daring Greatly: How the Courage to Be Vulnerable Transforms the Way We Live, Love, Parent, and Lead.
3. Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior.
4. Dunbar, R. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology.
5. Rains, S. A., & Wright, K. B. (2016). Social support and health outcomes in online communities: A meta-analysis. Health Communication.
6. Sprecher, S., & Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with love, commitment, and satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.