The Psychology of Forced Gratitude

Minorities in leadership—women, neurodivergent individuals, Indigenous peoples, immigrants—are often met with an unspoken expectation: You should be grateful just to be here. This forced gratitude narrative serves as a subtle but powerful form of control, reinforcing systemic biases that undermine their leadership potential. The underlying message is clear: You don’t truly belong; you were given this opportunity, so be thankful and do not ask for more.

The Psychology Behind Forced Gratitude

For underrepresented groups, leadership is rarely a straightforward path. Even after overcoming barriers, they may encounter:

• Expectations to express gratitude rather than advocate for their needs.
• Pressure to prove they deserve their role, even when overqualified.
• Guilt for seeking more—whether in recognition, pay, authority, or autonomy.

This phenomenon is rooted in systemic inequality. Leadership has historically been reserved for certain demographics, and when individuals from marginalised groups break through, they are often reminded—explicitly or implicitly—that they are fortunate rather than deserving.

Where This Dynamic Appears

Workplace Leadership.

In professional settings, minorities in leadership positions may frequently be told:

• “You should be thankful for this opportunity, even if it’s not exactly what you wanted.”
• “You’re lucky to have a seat at the table.”

For example, a woman promoted to an executive role may be discouraged from negotiating her salary because she should be "grateful" for the position. A neurodivergent leader might be expected to accept minimal workplace accommodations rather than advocate for systemic change.

Political Representation.

In politics, minority leaders are often expected to temper their demands:

• “Be thankful you’re included in the discussion.”
• “Change takes time. Appreciate the progress that’s been made.”

Indigenous leaders, for example, may be encouraged to accept incremental policy changes rather than push for full sovereignty or land rights. The underlying assumption is that their participation is a privilege rather than a rightful claim.

Media and Lived-Experience Research Representation.

The concept of forced gratitude extends to public narratives about diversity and inclusion:

• “Be happy there’s representation at all.”
• “This is progress. Why ask for more now?”

When marginalised communities push for more accurate and nuanced portrayals in media, they are often met with resistance. The expectation is that they should appreciate any inclusion, even if it is tokenistic or reinforces harmful stereotypes.

The Consequences of Forced Gratitude

The expectation of gratitude can have profound psychological effects, leading to:

• Impostor Syndrome: Constantly feeling the need to justify one’s position and internalising the belief that one does not deserve to be where one is.
• Self-Silencing: Avoiding confrontation to escape being labeled “difficult.”
• Burnout: Overworking to prove one’s worth, often at the expense of well-being.

Beyond individual impact, forced gratitude stifles broader progress by discouraging advocacy for systemic change. When leaders from marginalized backgrounds are expected to appreciate what they have rather than push for what they need and to advance the greater good, meaningful reform is delayed or derailed.

Challenging the Narrative

Resisting forced gratitude requires both individual and collective action:

• Reframe the Narrative. Recognise that success is earned, not gifted, and that conditions for success are not equitably distributed in a world where some groups hold more power than others.
• Set Boundaries. Advocate for fair treatment without guilt.
• Call It Out. Question why gratitude is being used to silence or diminish progress.
• Support Others. Elevate voices that challenge these expectations.

Leadership Essential Reads

The Power of Personal Branding

Becoming a Better Leader

Conclusion: A Call for True Equity

True leadership is not about forced gratitude; it is about respect, equity, and creating space for diverse perspectives to thrive. The expectation that some should simply be thankful to be included is a mechanism of control, not empowerment.

Recognising and challenging this dynamic is a necessary step toward more equitable leadership structures. The more we expose these patterns and push back against them, the closer we come to a world in which leadership is based on ability and vision, rather than an obligation to be “thankful” for systemic scraps.