|
The Gambler's Gamble Behind the misguided belief that a run of bad luck increases the probability of a win. By: Dan Schulman
Because people are so driven to up the ante after a loss, Gehring believes that the medial frontal cortex unconsciously influences future decisions based on the impact of the loss, in addition to registering the loss itself. Gehring drew this conclusion by asking 12 subjects fitted with electrode caps to choose either the number 5 or 25, with the larger number representing the riskier bet. On any given round, both numbers could amount to a loss, both could amount to a gain or the results could split, one number signifying a loss, the other a gain. The medial frontal cortex responded to the outcome of a gamble within a quarter of a second, registering sharp electrical impulses only after a loss. Gehring points out that if the medial frontal cortex simply detected errors it would have reacted after participants chose the lesser of two possible gains. In other words, choosing "5" during a round in which both numbers paid off and betting on "25" would have yielded a larger profit. After the study appeared in Science, Gehring received several e-mails from stock traders likening the "gambler's fallacy" to impulsive trading decisions made directly after off-loading a losing security. Researchers speculate that such risky, split-second decision-making could extend to fighter pilots, firemen and policemen—professions in which rapid-fire decisions are crucial and frequent.
Psychology Today Magazine, Aug/Sep 2002
Last Reviewed 10 Apr 2008 Article ID: 2286 |
|
Related Articles
We change our laugh to suit the crowd.
Peers have little influence over your child's taste.
No color affects us as strongly as red.
Special Offers
|




