Please, good looking men, never have defective sperm or inferior off spring. I just don't believe that. Where is the prove.

Some of the most handsome male models are also, dull, boring, and mentally lazy, and predjudice.

Good looking people are nice to look at, we treat them like Gods. We are all drawn to beauty. Be it in nature, art, or in a face. That well never ever change. We all what the advantages they were gifted with. They are instantly liked.

But to assume they have better sperm quality. Not. Were, Einstien's parents beautiful? I call his parental sperm superior.

I guess your articles make me wonder just how you would define "sperm quality".

Does that mean that it also produces offspring that are intelligent, beautiful, etc?
Does it mean that more partners are attracted to your superior sperm?
Does it mean that it takes less to produce offspring?
Does it produce qualities that are in line with current evolutionary trends?

Just what is superior sperm? Sounds like a cheap pickup line without clarity!
Hey babe want some of my superior juice….

That Good looking, intelligent people enjoy advantages in life certainly isn't a revolutionary idea. I guess much of this depends on just how you value a human being?

Sperm quality?

I´m not sure about this but sperm quality is related with something like:

the absolute amount and the concentration of sperm cells that an individual produces.

The velocity of sperm cell movement

The resistance to the chemically hostile enviroment of female´s vagina and uterus

the point is that if you have an abundant, rich, fast and resistant sperm, even if your partner is cheating you having fun with other guys, your sperm is in the pole position to win the reproductive race!

Since phenotypic signals of general health are related with sexual attractiveness, it is not crazy to think that healthier men who use to be perceived as more attractive than less healthy ones, have sperm above the average quality

A genotype will give you many varieties of phenotype. So if he is saying that good looking men on average express more phenotypes for good sperm quality he could be right but you could definitely have a less attractive male with a phenotype for better sperm quality as well. Who gets a shot at implanting the sperm is where it counts, so we have to ask ourselves is it the good looking male or less attractive or ugly male that gets a chance to mate. Then we have to consider other factors such say that a good looking male may lack the emotional IQ to relate to women in such a way that mating chances are fair or excellent while an uglier male with good emotional IQ with no obvious defects could have fair or excellent chances of mating as well even with poor sperm quality which might be remedied with with the ol quantity not quality approach.

Handsome men may have less genetic anomalies in their DNA, which could be why their faces are more symmetrical. These minimal genetic anomalies would also give them the "optimum" sperm. It's really interesting to think about.